Effect of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Survival in Patients with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This study aims to determine if percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) does improve survival in stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). RECENT FINDINGS: The International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial will evaluate patients with moderate to severe ischemia and will be the largest randomized trial of an initial management strategy of coronary revascularization (percutaneous or surgical) versus optimal medical therapy alone for SIHD. Although the ISCHEMIA trial may show a benefit with upfront coronary revascularization in this high-risk population, cardiac events after PCI are largely caused by plaque rupture in segments outside of the original stented segment. Furthermore, given the robust data from prior randomized trials, which showed no survival benefit with PCI, and the likelihood that the highest risk patients in ISCHEMIA will be treated with surgery, it is unlikely that the ISCHEMIA trial will show a survival benefit particular to PCI. RECENT FINDINGS: Although PCI relieves symptoms, the evidence base indicates that it does not prolong survival in SIHD.

Glycemic Control in Coronary Revascularization.

OPINION STATEMENT: Hyperglycemia in the setting of coronary revascularization is associated with increased adverse cardiovascular events in patients with or without diabetes mellitus. Data suggest that acute peri-procedural hyperglycemia causes an increase in inflammation, platelet activity, and endothelial dysfunction and is associated with plaque instability and infarct size. While peri-procedural blood glucose level is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing coronary revascularization, treatment strategies remain uncertain. Randomized clinical trials of glucose-insulin-potassium infusions have consistently shown no benefit, while those comparing insulin therapy versus standard of care have demonstrated mixed results, likely due to the failure to reach euglycemia with these strategies. Although no glucose-lowering agent has been shown to be superior in peri-procedural glycemic control, the continuation of clinically prescribed long-acting glucose-lowering medications in patients with diabetes mellitus prior to coronary angiography and possible percutaneous coronary intervention may be the simplest and most effective approach to maintain euglycemia and decrease the associated increase in inflammation and platelet activity. However, alternative strategies such as therapies targeted at the underlying mechanism of harm (e.g., more potent anti-platelet therapy, anti-inflammatory therapy) should also be considered and warrant further investigation.