Venous Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: The Role of Early Rib Resection.

The upper extremity is an uncommon site for deep vein thrombosis and, although most of these thrombotic events are secondary to catheters or indwelling devices, venous thoracic outlet syndrome is an important cause of primary thrombosis. Young, active, otherwise healthy individuals that engage in repetitive upper extremity exercises, such as those required by a military vocation, may be at an increased risk. We present the case of a Naval Officer diagnosed with venous thoracic outlet syndrome whereby a multimodal approach with early surgical decompression was used. Although thoracic outlet decompression by means of first rib resection is the standard of care, timing of first rib resection after thrombolysis is debated. With respect to the active duty service member, the optimal timing of additional postoperative interventions for residual venous defects and duration of anticoagulation remain in question. A more streamlined perioperative treatment regimen may benefit the military patient without jeopardizing the quality of care and allow more expeditious return to full duty.

Series of Noncontrast Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiographies to Identify Problems with Arteriovenous Fistula Maturation.

BACKGROUND: Successful maturation of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) remains a challenge for those managing patients with end-stage renal disease. Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MR) can be used to evaluate AVFs without the risk of radiation exposure, intravenous contrast, or reliance on the operator-dependent modality of color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS). The objective of our study was to assess the utility of TOF-MR in the evaluation of nonmaturing AVFs and to identify the best clinical situations to use this technology. METHODS: Consecutive patients with abnormal findings on CDUS or physical examination after AVF creation underwent 3-dimensional (3D) TOF-MR. Imaging was performed at 3 T with a scan acquisition time of approximately 15 min. The technique was similar to head and neck magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), except presaturation bands were not used, thereby allowing simultaneous visualization of both arterial and venous flow. A total of 19 TOF-MR studies were performed. RESULTS: Nineteen patients underwent imaging and were the focus of this study. Seventeen of 19 TOF-MR studies were of diagnostic quality and yielded findings which enabled the vascular surgeon to take corrective measures. Findings included inflow stenosis, anastomotic narrowing, venous outflow stenosis, and hemodynamically significant venous tributaries. Twelve of 17 patients required conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA). The congruence rate between TOF-MR and DSA was 83.3%. Four patients (21%) avoided DSA and went directly to definitive surgical treatment including branch ligation (3) or new access (1). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report in the literature of successful implementation of 3D TOF-MR to assist in identifying AVF maturation problems. This unique noninvasive imaging modality provides actionable images without contrast or radiation exposure and can obviate the need for invasive diagnostic procedures or provide an anatomic map for planning corrective intervention.

A pulseless limb poorly predicts an arterial injury in combat trauma.

BACKGROUND: A pulseless limb is considered a hard sign of an arterial injury after penetrating trauma in the civilian population. However, the reliability of this finding has never been examined in combat trauma. The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability of the pulseless limb in the combat trauma population. Reasons for false positive physical examination findings were also identified. METHODS: The Joint Theater Trauma Registry identified all patients who presented to a military treatment facility (MTF) in Kandahar, Afghanistan, with a penetrating extremity injury over a 2-year period. Patients found to have a pulse deficit on initial physical examination were followed, and the results of the subsequent computed tomographic angiogram or arteriogram recorded. Patient demographics, injury patterns, and physiological data were examined. Standard statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2012, 644 patients were treated at a single MTF for lower extremity penetrating injuries. The most common mechanisms of injury were explosions (62%) and gunshot wounds (20%). Of the 577 patients with complete medical records, 448 patients (78%) presented with palpable pulses, 115 patients (20%) presented with a pulseless limb, and 14 (2%) presented with hard signs of vascular injury. Of those with a pulseless limb and abnormal ankle-brachial index (ABI) or no ABI obtained who underwent further radiologic imaging, 38 patients (77%) had no arterial injury identified. Compared with those with a palpable pulse, patients with a pulseless limb without an arterial injury were more likely to have a higher Injury Severity Score (ISS), lower hematocrit, lower pH, greater base deficit, higher heart rate, more frequent use of tranexamic acid, and received greater volumes of packed red blood cells, plasma, and crystalloids. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that a pulseless limb is a poor predictor of arterial injury and should not be considered a hard sign of vascular injury in the combat population. Variables including a high ISS, anemia, acidosis, and need for resuscitation products, each a surrogate for injury severity, may contribute to the decreased accuracy of the physical examination in our troops. This may translate into unnecessary immediate exploration or other interventions in patients who present with more significant injuries from the battlefield. Future studies must continue to focus on improved algorithms for diagnostic accuracy of extremity vascular injuries in this population.

Outcomes after long-term follow-up of combat-related extremity injuries in a multidisciplinary limb salvage clinic.

BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of casualties from the Global War on Terror is decreasing, there remains a focus on the long-term sequelae from injuries sustained in the combat. Patients with prior significant limb injuries remain at risk of future complications. This study examines our institution's experience with a multidisciplinary team approach toward this challenging patient population. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on all patients treated in a single institution Limb Preservation Clinic over a 2-year period. Those patients who sustained a combat-related injury in theater were examined. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, amputation rates, time to amputation, and reasons for failure were examined. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were evaluated in our multidisciplinary Limb Preservation Clinic over a 2-year period. Twenty patients (21%) were seen for combat-related injuries. Sixteen patients were evaluated and treated for chronic complications at a median of 13 months from their injury. All 16 patients were male with a median age of 24 years (range, 20-35). Ten patients sustained injuries secondary to a dismounted improvised explosive device (IED). All 16 patients had extensive soft tissue injuries and associated fractures. Only 2 patients sustained a vascular injury. The median number of prior surgeries to the affected limb was 8 (range, 3-19). The limb salvage rate of 37% was lower than our noncombat cohort (47%). The most common reasons for delayed amputation included chronic pain, osteomyelitis, and soft tissue infections. CONCLUSIONS: The high secondary amputation rates seen in this cohort underscores the need for long-term follow-up. Despite successful initial outcomes, many patients eventually progress to limb loss. Patients who sustain a dismounted IED are at greatest risk for a delayed amputation. Identifying and addressing those factors which lead to delayed amputation should be a priority for returning war veterans and focus of future studies.

Limb salvage after vascular reconstruction followed by tissue transfer during the Global War on Terror.

BACKGROUND: Combat extremity wounds are complex and frequently require an immediate vascular reconstruction in the operational environment followed by delayed tissue coverage at a stateside medical treatment facility. The purpose of this study was to evaluate limb salvage outcomes after combat-related vascular reconstruction that subsequently required delayed soft tissue coverage during the Global War on Terror. METHODS: Patients who incurred a war-related extremity injury necessitating an immediate vascular intervention followed by definitive limb reconstruction requiring flap coverage from combat injuries were reviewed. Patient demographics, types of vascular and extremity injuries, and surgical interventions were examined. Outcomes included limb salvage, primary and secondary graft patency, flap outcomes, and complications. Differences between upper extremities (UEs) and lower extremities (LEs) were compared. RESULTS: From 2003 to 2012, 27 patients were treated for combat-related extremity injuries with an immediate vascular reconstruction followed by delayed tissue coverage. Fifteen LEs and 12 UEs were treated. The mean age was 24 years. An explosion was the cause in 77% of patients, with a mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 19. An autogenous vein bypass was the most common reconstruction performed in 20 patients (74%). Other vascular repairs included a primary repair, a patch angioplasty with bovine pericardium, and a bypass with use of a prosthetic graft. Eight patients (30%) had a concomitant venous injury, and 23 (85%) had a bone fracture. Thirty flaps were performed at a mean of 33 days from the original injury. Pedicle flaps were used in 24 limbs and free tissue flaps in six limbs. Muscle, fasciocutaneous, bone, and composite flaps were used for tissue coverage. At a mean follow-up of 16 months, primary patency rates of all arterial reconstructions were 66% in the UE and 53% in the LE (P = .69). Secondary patency rates were 100% in the UE and 86% in the LE (P = .48). The overall limb salvage rate was 81%. Limb salvage rates were 66% in the LE and 100% in the UE (P = .04). Three amputated lower limbs (60%) had inline flow to the foot. The flap success rate was 96%. Reasons for amputation included arterial thrombosis, flap failure, persistent soft tissue infection, osteomyelitis, and debilitating peripheral nerve injuries with associated chronic pain. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate vascular repair followed by delayed tissue coverage can be performed with a high (>80%) limb salvage rate after combat trauma. Limb salvage rates were higher in the UE despite equivocally high arterial patency rates. Wounded warriors can expect limb salvage by use of this international algorithm.

Safety of carotid endarterectomy in a high-risk population: lessons from the VA and Connecticut.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) have been demonstrated in randomized trials, but these studies excluded patients thought to be at higher risk for poor outcomes. We sought to determine whether patients undergoing CEA in Veteran Affairs Hospitals (VA) were at higher risk and had different outcomes, compared with patients in nonfederal hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: Records of all CEA performed in the VA Connecticut Healthcare System between October 1997 and September 2002 were examined and compared with CEA performed in all nonfederal Connecticut hospitals (CT). RESULTS: There were 7,089 CEAs performed (VA, 140; CT, 6,949). VA patients had increased comorbidity scores and symptomatic presentation (39% versus 14%; p < 0.0001). Perioperative mortality rates were 1.4% (VA) and 0.3% (CT) (p = 0.06). Perioperative stroke (VA, 1.4% versus CT, 0.9%; p = 0.15) and cardiac complication (VA, 2.9% versus CT, 2.1%; p = 0.54) rates were similar. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that perioperative mortality correlated with symptomatic presentation (odds ratio 11.7, p < 0.0001), but not performance, in a VA hospital (p = 0.23); patients treated at the VA were also not at higher risk for stroke (p = 0.94) or cardiac complications (p = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Despite increased severity of illness and symptomatic presentation, VA patients had similar perioperative outcomes compared with patients undergoing CEA in nonfederal hospitals in the state of Connecticut. These results suggest not only that patients undergoing vascular surgery at the VA may form a higher-risk population compared with patients receiving care in non-VA hospitals, but that these high-risk patients can undergo CEA safely.

Vascular Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.

Vascular thoracic outlet syndrome generally affects young, active, otherwise healthy patients. The diagnosis is suspected by clinical presentation, and can be confirmed with angiography or venography. Conservative management has been associated with significant morbidity and long-term residual disability. We have used a multimodal treatment protocol that includes thrombolysis, anticoagulation, surgical decompression, and interventional procedures. Catheter-directed recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator and intravenous heparin infusion are instituted at the time of diagnosis to promote recanalization and prevent propagation of thrombus. Surgical decompression of the thoracic outlet can be readily achieved by first rib resection during the same hospitalization. Postoperative venograms are obtained in all patients. Residual stenoses can be managed with angioplasty alone in some patients but more commonly require stent placement. We believe thrombolysis, anticoagulation, surgical decompression, and percutaneous interventions act synergistically to improve results of therapy in patients with vascular thoracic outlet syndrome.