Achievement of recommended treatment targets for bone and mineral metabolism in haemodialysis patients using paricalcitol: an observational study.

OBJECTIVE: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a common problem among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on haemodialysis. This study was conducted to assess the use, effectiveness and safety of intravenous paricalcitol in haemodialysis patients with various degrees of SHPT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This observational, multicentre, prospective study was conducted in 14 Swedish dialysis centres from May 2007 to June 2008 and included 92 haemodialysis patients with a diagnosis of SHPT associated with CKD. The decision to initiate treatment with intravenous paricalcitol was made by the treating physician. No treatment algorithms were provided. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 64 years. Of the 92 patients included, 74 had an intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) level of >300 pg/ml at baseline. Median iPTH was 584 pg/ml in patients with a baseline PTH of >300 pg/ml. During follow-up there was a decrease in iPTH to 323 pg/ml at 6 months (-45%, p < 0.0001). In parallel, there was a small increase in serum calcium, but serum phosphorus and the calcium × phosphorus product remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that intravenous paricalcitol substantially and safely decreased iPTH in haemodialysis patients with a baseline iPTH above the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative recommended target range (150-300 pg/ml) and had minimal impact on serum minerals.

Biocompatibility and tolerability of a purely bicarbonate-buffered peritoneal dialysis solution.

BACKGROUND: Novel peritoneal dialysis solutions are characterized by a minimal content of glucose degradation products and a neutral pH. Many studies have shown the biocompatibility of neutral lactate-buffered solutions; however, until now, the effect of purely bicarbonate-buffered solutions has not been intensively studied in vivo. METHODS: This study was an open label, prospective, crossover multicenter trial to investigate the biocompatibility of a purely bicarbonate-buffered solution (bicPDF) by measuring biocompatibility parameters such as cancer antigen 125 (CA125) in peritoneal effluent. 55 patients were enrolled in the study. After a 2-week run-in phase, 53 patients could be randomized into 2 groups, starting with either standard lactate-buffered peritoneal dialysis fluid (SPDF) for 12 weeks (phase 1) and then switching to bicPDF for 12 weeks (phase 2), or vice versa. Overnight peritoneal effluents were collected at baseline and at the end of phases 1 and 2 and were tested for CA125, hyaluronic acid, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin 6 (IL-6), interferon gamma (IFNgamma), and transforming growth factor-beta(1) (TGF-beta1). Total ultrafiltration and residual renal function were also assessed. At the end of the study, pain during fluid exchange and dwell was evaluated using special questionnaires. RESULTS: 34 patients completed the study; 27 of them provided data for analysis of the biocompatibility parameters. CA125 levels in overnight effluent were significantly higher with bicPDF (61.9 +/- 33.2 U/L) than with SPDF (18.6 +/- 18.2 U/L, p < 0.001). Hyaluronic acid levels were significantly lower after the use of bicPDF (185.0 +/- 119.6 ng/mL) than after SPDF (257.4 +/- 174.0 ng/mL, p = 0.013). Both TNF-alpha and TGF-beta1 showed higher levels with the use of bicPDF than with SPDF. No differences were observed for IL-6, VEGF, or IFNgamma levels. We observed an improvement in the glomerular filtration rate with the use of bicPDF but no differences were observed for total fluid loss. Pain scores could be analyzed in 23 patients: there was no difference between the solutions. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a purely bicarbonate-buffered low-glucose degradation product solution significantly changes most of the peritoneal effluent markers measured, suggesting an improvement in peritoneal membrane integrity. Additionally, it seems to have a positive effect on residual renal function.

Interaction between renal function and microalbuminuria for cardiovascular risk in hypertension: the nordic diltiazem study.

We investigated whether renal function and microalbuminuria are independent predictors and whether any interaction exists between them, regarding future cardiovascular disease in hypertensive patients (n=10 881) followed for 4.5 years. The primary end points (PEs) were fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke and other cardiovascular deaths. Creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR), estimated using the formulas of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study group and Cockroft and Gault and in a subsample (n=4929) of microalbuminuria and interaction terms of microalbuminuria and renal function, were related to the risk of the PE using Cox proportional hazards model after full adjustment. Increased creatinine (P<0.001), decreased GFR from Cockroft and Gault (P=0.001), and decreased GFR from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study group (P=0.001) were all independent risk factors for the PE. Stepwise exclusion of patients with the poorest renal function excluded the possibility that the relationship between decreasing renal function and the PE was driven only by patients with severely impaired renal function. Microalbuminuria and all 3 of the indices of renal function predicted the PE independent of each other. There was a significant interaction between microalbuminuria and GFR from Cockroft and Gault (P=0.040) in prediction of the PE. Both renal function and microalbuminuria add independent prognostic information regarding cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients. The cardiovascular risk associated with microalbuminuria increases with a decline in GFR, as demonstrated by a significant interaction between microalbuminuria and GFR from Cockroft and Gault. Because estimation of the total cardiovascular risk is essential for the aggressiveness of risk factor interventions, simultaneous inclusion of GFR and microalbuminuria in global cardiovascular risk assessment is essential.

A rationale for an individualized administration frequency of epoetin beta: a clinical perspective.

The efficacy and safety of intravenous (i.v.) and subcutaneous recombinant human erythropoietin (rh-EPO, epoetin) for the treatment of renal anaemia is well established. Subcutaneous administration of epoetin is recommended by current guidelines because it is more flexible and convenient than i.v. dosing, enables dose reduction of epoetin and results in cost benefits. Subcutaneous administration of epoetin beta permits flexible dosing regimens that can be tailored to patients' individual needs. This was demonstrated in a recent, large, randomized, controlled trial in which once-weekly dosing of epoetin beta was as effective as the same total dose administered two or three times weekly. New developments in delivery devices for self-administration, which are more convenient and acceptable to patients, also contribute to the ability to individualize treatment. Furthermore, educating patients in the management of renal anaemia encourages collaboration between patients and health care providers, enabling more tailored treatment regimens to be developed. In conclusion, the use of flexible dosing frequencies, easy-to-use delivery devices and patient education may increase patient compliance and encourage self-administration of epoetin beta. The ability to individualize epoetin beta therapy increases the number of options available to nephrologists and their patients, leading to greater opportunities to tailor treatment according to specific needs.

Fluvastatin improves lipid abnormalities in patients with moderate to advanced chronic renal insufficiency.

Chronic renal insufficiency is characterized by specific abnormalities in lipoprotein metabolism, affecting both apolipoprotein A (apo A)- and apo B-containing lipoproteins. To evaluate the effects of fluvastatin, a synthetic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, on renal dyslipoproteinemia, we performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way, period cross-over study. Study patients were administered fluvastatin, 40 mg/d, or placebo during 8 weeks in randomized order. Forty-five nonnephrotic patients (28 men, 17 women) without diabetes with moderate to advanced chronic renal insufficiency participated in the study. Their mean age was 56.4 +/- 11.0 years. Glomerular filtration rate ranged from 12 to 44 mL/min/1.73 m2 of body surface area (mean, 27.5 +/- 10.5 mL/min/1.73 m2). Fluvastatin treatment resulted in significant reductions in the primary outcome variables low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; -26%; P < 0.001), apo B (-21%; P < 0.001), and lipoprotein B complex (Lp-Bc) (-14%; P < 0.01). There were statistically significant differences between fluvastatin and placebo treatment for the secondary outcome variables total cholesterol (-19%), triglycerides (TGs; -13%), VLDL-C (-13%), apo E (-13%), and Lp-B (-22%). There was no treatment effect on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or lipoprotein(a). Fluvastatin treatment was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events during the study. In conclusion, fluvastatin treatment was well tolerated in patients with moderately advanced renal insufficiency and led to a significant reduction in cholesterol-rich, but to a lesser extent in TG-rich, apo B-containing lipoproteins. It remains to be clarified whether these positive changes in lipoprotein profile also will result in attenuation of the atherosclerotic process in these patients, as well as beneficially affect the progression of chronic renal failure.

Enalapril Treatment in a Patient With Impaired Renal Function and Intolerance to Captopril.

In a 36-year-old woman with malignant hypertension and moderate renal insufficiency from nephrosclerosis normotension was not achieved by the combination of a beta-blocker, a vasodilator, and a loop-diuretic. The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor captopril was then added to the therapy. The blood pressure control was good. However, due to adverse reactions, captopril had to be withdrawn. Later on, the patient was successfully treated with enalapril, another ACE inhibitor, without the relapse of any adverse reactions.