Qualified kidney injury biomarkers demonstrate value during early clinical drug development.

Drug-induced kidney injury (DIKI) is of significant concern, both during drug development and in clinical practice. We report a patient-centric approach for clinical implementation of the FDA-qualified kidney safety biomarker panel, highlighting Phase 1 and 2 trials for candidate therapeutics in Pfizer's portfolio (PFE-1 and PFE-2, respectively) that induced renal tubular injury in rat toxicity studies. Clusterin (CLU), cystatin-C (CysC), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), and osteopontin (OPN) were measured in urine samples from i) Phase 1 healthy volunteers (HVs; n = 12) dosed with PFE-1, ii) Phase 2 rheumatoid arthritis patients (RA; n = 266) dosed with PFE-2, iii) lupus patients on standard-of-care therapies (n = 121), and iv) healthy volunteers (n = 60). The FDA-defined composite measure (CM), calculated as the geometric mean response across the 6 biomarkers, was increased ∼30% in HVs administered 100 mg PFE-1 relative to placebo, providing evidence of DIKI. In contrast, the CM for RA patients dosed with PFE-2 was comparable to placebo controls, helping to de-risk the concern for DIKI at clinically relevant doses. Comparing individual biomarker concentrations across disease states revealed that CLU, KIM-1, NAG, NGAL, and OPN are elevated in the urine of RA and lupus patients (those without severe active proliferative lupus nephritis) relative to HVs. Overall, these case studies demonstrate the value of using the FDA-qualified kidney biomarker panel to guide risk assessment, dose selection, and clinical decision making for novel therapeutics, both in HVs and patient populations.

Performance of Modified ALMS and BLISS Criteria with Standard of Care Treatment in Two US Health Care Systems.

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken in a predominantly Black population undergoing standard treatment for lupus nephritis (LN) to estimate the incidence of, and risk factors for, complete response (CR) according to modified Aspreva Lupus Management Study (mALMS) and modified Belimumab International Study in Lupus Nephritis (mBLISS) criteria by 12 months. METHODS: Patients with biopsy-proven LN class III or IV ± V, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio of ≥1gm/gm and estimated glomerular filtration rate of >50 ml/minute/1.73 m2 at the time of the incident LN flare were included. The clinical, treatment, and laboratory factors associated with CR were identified using multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Of 173 patients, 86.1% were women, 77.5% were Black, and over half (59.5%) had non-commercial insurance. By 12 months, 20.6% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 14.6-28.6%) achieved mALMS CR and 33.7% (95% CI 26.4-42.4%) achieved mBLISS CR. Factors associated with mBLISS CR were commercial insurance (adjusted CR ratio = 3.5 [95% CI 1.9-6.7]; P < 0.001), albumin (adjusted CR ratio = 1.8 per 1 gm/dl increase in albumin; P = 0.02), and low C4 (adjusted CR ratio = 2.6; P = 0.03). Cumulative incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) at 3 years was 23.1% (95% CI 15.7-31.3%) and 6.1% (95% CI 2.8-11.1%) for death. Patients with non-commercial insurance were more likely to develop ESRD, with cumulative incidence of 30.4% (95% CI 19.6-41.9%) compared to 12.7% (95% CI 5.0-24.2%) for patients with commercial insurance (P = 0.024). CONCLUSION: In a primarily Black, uninsured LN population, despite achieving similar CR rates at 12 months, the incidence of ESRD and death exceeded those observed in controlled clinical trials with placebo arms.

Combination of infliximab and methotrexate therapy for early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the benefits of initiating treatment with methotrexate (MTX) and infliximab (anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha [anti-TNFalpha] monoclonal antibody) with those of MTX treatment alone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of < or =3 years' duration. METHODS: RA patients were eligible if they had active disease and no prior treatment with MTX or a TNFalpha inhibitor. One thousand forty-nine patients were randomly assigned in a 4:5:5 ratio to 3 treatment groups: MTX-placebo, MTX-3 mg/kg infliximab, and MTX-6 mg/kg infliximab. MTX dosages were rapidly escalated to 20 mg/week, and infliximab or placebo infusions were given at weeks 0, 2, and 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter through week 46. RESULTS: At week 54, the median percentage of American College of Rheumatology improvement (ACR-N) was higher for the MTX-3 mg/kg infliximab and MTX-6 mg/kg infliximab groups than for the MTX-placebo group (38.9% and 46.7% versus 26.4%, respectively; P < 0.001 for both comparisons). Patients in the MTX-3 mg/kg infliximab and MTX-6 mg/kg infliximab groups also showed less radiographic progression than those receiving MTX alone (mean +/- SD changes in van der Heijde modification of the total Sharp score at week 54: 0.4 +/- 5.8 and 0.5 +/- 5.6 versus 3.7 +/- 9.6, respectively; P < 0.001 for each comparison). In addition, physical function improved significantly more in the MTX-3 mg/kg infliximab and MTX-6 mg/kg infliximab groups than in the MTX-placebo group. Infliximab therapy was associated with a significantly higher incidence of serious infections, especially pneumonia. CONCLUSION: For patients with active RA in its early stages, combination therapy with MTX and infliximab provides greater clinical, radiographic, and functional benefits than treatment with MTX alone.