ABSTRACT
Little is known about severe anaphylaxis in the pediatric population. In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to describe the characteristics of children who required admission from an outpatient setting to one of two Pediatric Intensive Care Units in Atlantic Canada with a primary diagnosis of anaphylaxis. During the 10-year study period, there were 12 admissions (58% females) for a population incidence of 2.4 per 100,000 children. Both patients who died were adolescents with a witnessed anaphylaxis event, immediately recognized as such after exposure to a known allergen, with immediate access to epinephrine that was not administered until after cardiorespiratory arrest occurred. This study highlights the high mortality associated with severe anaphylaxis and the ongoing need for education surrounding the early administration of intramuscular epinephrine.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Allergic reactions to amoxicillin are very common occurrences in the pediatric age group; however, onset of symptoms can present a diagnostic dilemma. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case series that describes three children (8-year-old white girl, 2-year-old white boy and 14-month-old Chinese boy) who presented with varied onset of allergic reactions to amoxicillin, specifically immediate (within the first hour after exposure) and non-immediate onset. One child developed immediate onset allergy to oral challenge with amoxicillin although his clinical history was evident for non-immediate onset allergy to amoxicillin. He was the only case that had a positive skin test to penicillin. Two other children presented with reactions toward the end of their treatment course of amoxicillin, yet one patient developed immediate onset allergy while the other patient developed non-immediate onset allergy after challenge. CONCLUSIONS: This case series demonstrates diagnostic challenges facing physicians assessing allergic reactions to amoxicillin. As onset of reactions can dictate severity and pathogenic type of allergy, a thorough clinical history and subsequent appropriate diagnostic testing including medication challenge can help establish the diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Amoxicillin/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity, Delayed/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/diagnosis , Otitis Media/drug therapy , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Amoxicillin/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Child , Child, Preschool , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Delayed/chemically induced , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/chemically induced , Infant , Male , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Predictive Value of Tests , Skin TestsSubject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/microbiology , Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome/microbiology , Pneumonia, Pneumococcal/complications , Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , Amoxicillin/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antigens, Tumor-Associated, Carbohydrate/analysis , Anuria/etiology , Anuria/therapy , Complement C3/analysis , Coombs Test , Creatinine/blood , Erythrocyte Transfusion , Hemoglobins/analysis , Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome/therapy , Humans , Infant , L-Lactate Dehydrogenase/blood , Male , Plasma Exchange , Pneumonia, Pneumococcal/diagnostic imaging , Pneumonia, Pneumococcal/drug therapy , Radiography, Thoracic , Renal Dialysis , Uremia/etiology , Uremia/therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in clinical remission show pathologic findings on either gray-scale or power Doppler ultrasound of their joints. METHODS: Children with JIA were eligible if they were in clinical remission for at least 3 months, as defined by the absence of clinically active joints and serologic markers of inflammation. Gray-scale as well as power Doppler ultrasonography of the wrist, knee, and ankle were carried out on previously affected joints and unaffected contralateral joints. Images were read by 2 independent readers. Findings were categorized as 1) structural abnormalities in the case of synovial thickening or increased joint fluid on gray-scale ultrasound or 2) power Doppler positive in the case of an abnormal power Doppler signal. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 28 patients. Eight of 14 patients with previous wrist involvement had pathologic gray-scale findings, and 3 of these 14 patients also had pathologic Doppler findings in the wrist. None of the 20 patients with past knee involvement had pathologic gray-scale or Doppler findings in the knee. Six of 15 patients with previous ankle involvement had pathologic gray-scale findings and 1 of the 15 patients had pathologic Doppler findings in the tibiotalar joint. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that some patients who meet clinical criteria for remission continue to show ongoing pathology on joint ultrasound, which may be suggestive of persistent inflammation.