1.
J Physiol
; 588(Pt 11): 1819-20, 2010 Jun 01.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-20516348
Subject(s)
Muscle, Skeletal/growth & development , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Obesity/physiopathology , Physical Conditioning, Animal/physiology , Animals , Diet , Dietary Fats/pharmacology , Insulin/biosynthesis , Insulin/physiology , Insulin-Like Growth Factor I/biosynthesis , Insulin-Like Growth Factor I/physiology , Mice , Muscle, Skeletal/drug effects , Protein Biosynthesis/physiology , RNA, Ribosomal/metabolism , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Signal Transduction/physiology
2.
J Appl Behav Anal
; 38(1): 107-10, 2005.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-15898479
ABSTRACT
Researchers have demonstrated that both deprivation and satiation can affect the outcome of preference assessments for food. In the current study, paired-stimulus preference assessments for tangible items were conducted under three conditions: control, deprivation, and satiation. Three persons with developmental disabilities and 3 typically developing preschool children served as participants. The results demonstrated that deprivation and satiation influenced the outcome of preference assessments of leisure items or toys.
