Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Immigr Minor Health ; 17(5): 1347-54, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25053147

ABSTRACT

The Latino population in the US is projected to grow substantially in the years ahead. Although often referred to as a single group, Latinos are not homogeneous. This article, based mainly on a national telephone survey of 1,478 Latino adults, examines the perspectives of six Latino heritage groups on the health care issues they face. The six groups differ in their reported health care experiences in: the types facilities they use in getting medical care, their ratings of the quality of care they receive, their experiences with discrimination in getting quality care, the level of confidence they have in being able to pay for a major illness. One thing the heritage groups agree on is that diabetes is the biggest health problem facing their families. Community health leaders, particularly at the state level, need to focus on the specific Latino groups in their state or area and their unique situations.


Subject(s)
Ethnicity/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Financing, Personal , Humans , Language , Racism
3.
Int J Alzheimers Dis ; 2012: 903645, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22997601

ABSTRACT

The objective of this paper is to understand how the public's beliefs in five countries may change as more families have direct experience with Alzheimer's disease. The data are derived from a questionnaire survey conducted by telephone (landline and cell) with 2678 randomly selected adults in France, Germany, Poland, Spain, and the United States. The paper analyzes the beliefs and anticipated behavior of those in each country who report having had a family member with Alzheimer's disease versus those who do not. In one or more countries, differences were found between the two groups in their concern about getting Alzheimer's disease, knowledge that the disease is fatal, awareness of certain symptoms, and support for increased public spending. The results suggest that as more people have experience with a family member who has Alzheimer's disease, the public will generally become more concerned about Alzheimer's disease and more likely to recognize that Alzheimer's disease is a fatal disease. The findings suggest that other beliefs may only be affected if there are future major educational campaigns about the disease. The publics in individual countries, with differing cultures and health systems, are likely to respond in different ways as more families have experience with Alzheimer's disease.

4.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 14(5): 778-86, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18439361

ABSTRACT

We report the results of a national survey conducted to help public health officials understand the public's response to community mitigation interventions for a severe outbreak of pandemic influenza. Survey results suggest that if community mitigation measures are instituted, most respondents would comply with recommendations but would be challenged to do so if their income or job were severely compromised. The results also indicate that community mitigation measures could cause problems for persons with lower incomes and for racial and ethnic minorities. Twenty-four percent of respondents said that they would not have anyone available to take care of them if they became sick with pandemic influenza. Given these results, planning and public engagement will be needed to encourage the public to be prepared.


Subject(s)
Communicable Disease Control/methods , Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Public Opinion , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Health Policy , Humans , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Interviews as Topic , Public Health , Residence Characteristics , United States
5.
Health Expect ; 10(4): 350-7, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17986071

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fifteen years ago, public opinion surveys in Spain showed substantial dissatisfaction with the health-care system. Since that time, health-care in Spain has undergone significant changes, including a decentralization of the system, an increase in spending and a change in the way the system is financed. OBJECTIVE: This study examines how Spanish citizens rate the performance of their health system today, both as compared with other sectors of society and as compared with earlier time periods. METHODS: Data are drawn from nationally representative telephone surveys of the non-institutionalized adult Spanish population (age 18 years and over). The study was carried out in two phases: October-November 2005 (n = 3,010) and January 2006 (n = 2,101). RESULTS: The majority of the Spanish population thinks the health system needs to be changed. The problems cited relate mostly to long wait times to get health-care. Nevertheless, over the last 15 years, the proportion of people who have very negative views about the health system has decreased by half. The majority believes that not enough money is spent on health-care, but few people would support an increase in taxes to provide additional funding. The survey finds the National Health System's institutions and health professionals to be more highly trusted than other institutions and professional groups in the country. CONCLUSIONS: Government policy-makers in Spain face a dilemma: the public wants more health spending to decrease wait times, but there is substantial resistance to increasing taxes as a means to finance improvements in the system's capacity.


Subject(s)
National Health Programs/trends , Patient Satisfaction , Public Opinion , Trust , Adult , Humans , National Health Programs/statistics & numerical data , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
J Health Commun ; 8 Suppl 1: 83-92; discussion 148-51, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14692573

ABSTRACT

To communicate effectively with the public during an emergency, health officials need to find out in real time what Americans know and believe, whom they trust, and what actions they are taking in response to the crisis. Short-duration surveys can provide vital information to guide public officials in their response to events and their communication efforts. Prior research has shown that such surveys, when statistically re-weighted, can offer timely results without unacceptable risk of bias. Using examples from public opinion surveys during the anthrax attacks of 2001, this article examines the role such surveys can play during a public health crisis.


Subject(s)
Bioterrorism , Disaster Planning , Public Opinion , Surveys and Questionnaires , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Public Health Administration , United States
7.
N Engl J Med ; 348(5): 426-32, 2003 Jan 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12496352

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The potential for a bioterrorist attack involving smallpox has led to a debate about what national precautions should be taken. What is unclear is the public's knowledge of smallpox and views about precautions. METHODS: We conducted a national survey of 1006 adults selected by means of random-digit dialing. Respondents were asked about their knowledge of and beliefs about the smallpox virus and the vaccine, their possible reactions to a bioterrorist attack involving smallpox, and a number of proposed state emergency powers. RESULTS: The majority of the respondents have a number of beliefs about smallpox and smallpox vaccination that are false. The majority believe that there is an effective treatment for smallpox, that there have been cases of smallpox in the past five years, and that there is not enough smallpox vaccine to vaccinate everyone in the United States. Thirty percent believe that vaccination earlier in their lives would protect them from the disease. The majority of respondents said they wanted to be vaccinated; however, only 21 percent would want to be vaccinated if physicians declined vaccination. There was strong support among the respondents for several proposed state emergency powers. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest the need for public education about smallpox. These data also point to the importance of a discussion in the medical community about the advisability of vaccination of individual physicians at this time.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Smallpox Vaccine , Smallpox , Adult , Bioterrorism , Civil Defense/legislation & jurisprudence , Data Collection , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Immunization Programs , Risk , Smallpox/prevention & control , Smallpox Vaccine/adverse effects , United States , Vaccinia/transmission
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL