Clinical outcome of combined intracavitary / interstitial brachytherapy using a hybrid applicator in locally advanced cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) after image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) with combined intracavitary and interstitial (IC/IS) techniques using the hybrid Venezia applicator (Elekta AB, Sweden). METHODS: LACC patients (UICC Stage IIB - IVB) treated with radiochemotherapy followed by IGABT with the hybrid IC/IS Venezia applicator at a single institution were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment comprised EBRT of the pelvis with 45 Gy and concomitant weekly cisplatin chemotherapy (40 mg/m2) followed by MRI-based IGABT. Dosimetry, oncological outcome and toxicity were investigated. RESULTS: Forty-six patients underwent a total of 184 fractions of IGABT between 2017 and 2020. Median follow-up was 24 months. Combined IC/IS techniques were used in 40 patients (87%). The median HRCTV volume was 31.2 cm3 and the median HRCTV D90% was 92.3 Gy (EQD210). The median D2cm3 was 74.8 Gy for bladder, 57.9 Gy for rectum, 60.0 Gy for sigmoid and 52.2 Gy for bowel (EQD23). The 3-yr actuarial rates were 97.6% for local control, 97.6% for pelvic control, 59.9% for distant metastasis-free survival and 81.6% for overall survival. The crude rate for G2 and G3 late toxicity was 21.7% and 4.3%. CONCLUSIONS: IGABT with the hybrid Venezia applicator and a pronounced use of a combined IC/IS technique achieved high target doses, while maintaining low doses to organs at risk, leading to excellent local control and overall survival rates with acceptable toxicity.

Interstitial High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy of Liver Metastases in Oligometastatic Patients.

Local ablative treatments have emerged as a promising treatment strategy for patients with oligometastatic disease. Among others, interstitial brachytherapy (iBT) is an upcoming treatment option for unresectable liver metastases. We report the feasibility and oncologic outcome of iBT of oligometastatic liver metastases performed in patients with limited tumor burdens in a high-volume center. Patients undergoing iBT between August 2017and March 2019 were included. A retrospective analysis of patient outcomes and treatment complications was performed. Patients treated for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC) were compared to other histologies. A total of 141 iBT procedures were performed in 106 patients (male:52; female:54) and 244 liver metastases. Overall, 51% (54/106) of patients had a diagnosis of metastatic CRC. The median follow-up was 9 months, and overall survival (OS) was 92.3% at 6 months and 76.3% at 12 months. Local-relapse-free survival (LRFS) was 88.4% at 6 months and 71.5% at 12 months, with a significant difference between patients with CRC (84.1% and 50.6%) versus other histologies (92.4% and 92.4%, p < 0.001). A sub-group analysis showed a significant advantage in patients with CRC receiving a minimal dose (D100) of 20 Gy to the planning target volume. Treatments of smaller total liver-tumor volumes (<18 ccm) resulted in better LRFS rates. iBT is a safe and effective treatment approach for oligometastatic liver disease. A higher treatment dose is needed for patients with CRC. Moreover, lower metastatic burdens may be favorable for LRFS. Prospective studies are needed to assess the role of iBT in the oligometastatic setting as an alternative to other local ablative treatment approaches in patients with liver metastases.

Comparison of liver exposure in CT-guided high-dose rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy versus SBRT in hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma several local ablative treatments are available. Among others, radiation based treatments such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and high-dose rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR BT) have shown good local control rates. METHODS: We conducted a dose comparison between actually performed HDR BT versus virtually planned SBRT to evaluate the respective clinically relevant radiation exposure to uninvolved liver tissue. Moreover, dose coverage and conformity indices were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 46 treatment sessions (71 lesions, 38 patients) were evaluated. HDR BT was applied in a single fraction with a dose prescription of 1 × 15 Gy. D98 was 17.9 ± 1.3 Gy, D50 was 41.8 ± 8.1 Gy. The SBRT was planned with a prescribed dose of 3 × 12.5 Gy (65%-Isodose), D98 was 50.7 ± 3.1 Gy, D2 was 57.0 ± 2.3 Gy, and D50 was 55.2 ± 2.3 Gy. Regarding liver exposure Vliver10GyBT was compared to Vliver15.9GySBRT, Vliver16.2GySBRT (EQD2 equivalent doses), and Vliver20GySBRT (clinically relevant dose), all results showed significant differences (p < .001). In a case by case analysis Vliver10GyBT was smaller than Vliver20GySBRT in 38/46 cases (83%). Dmean of the liver was significantly smaller in BT compared to SBRT (p < .001). GTV volume was correlated to the liver exposure and showed an advantage of HDR BT over SBRT in comparison of clinically relevant doses, and for EQD2 equivalent doses. The advantage was more pronounced for greater liver lesions The Conformity Index (CI) was significantly better for BT, while Healthy Tissue Conformity Index (HTCI) and Conformation Number (CN) showed an advantage for SBRT (p < .001). CONCLUSION: HDR BT can be advantageous in respect of sparing of normal liver tissue as compared to SBRT, while providing excellent target conformity.

Combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of cervical cancer using the novel hybrid applicator Venezia: Clinical feasibility and initial results.

PURPOSE: To report on first-in-human experience and the initial clinical results using the hybrid applicator Venezia (Elekta, Sweden) in the treatment of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between March, 2017, and February, 2018, a total of 40 fractions were performed on patients undergoing definitive chemoradiation and brachytherapy (BT) for cervical cancer. A plan comparison was conducted evaluating the hybrid applicator with the clinically used intracavitary and interstitial (IC/IS) BT against a standard plan prescribed to Point A and a manually optimized plan using only intracavitary (IC) BT. Overall 80 treatment plans were retrospectively generated. RESULTS: The clinical use of the hybrid applicator system proved to be feasible in all 40 treatment fractions. The applicator consists of the IC tandem and two lunar-shaped ovoids forming a ring that serves as a template for defined parallel and oblique (12°) needle insertion. MRI preplanning was performed the day before the implant. One to six needles were placed per fraction, and overall a total of 66 needles were used. No complications such as bleeding or organ penetration occurred due to needle placement. Significant differences in IC/IS, Point A, and IC plans were derived for dose application to the target volume; D90 high-risk clinical target volume was 90.7 vs. 88.1 vs. 80.8 Gy (p = 0.008). Likewise, sparing of organs at risk differed significantly for bladder D2cc 79.4 vs. 91.8 vs. 79.2 Gy (p = 0.03) and rectum D2cc 58.7 vs. 67.3 vs. 62.5 Gy (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The clinical application of the Venezia applicator is feasible and allows significantly improved dose coverage while at the same time sufficiently sparing organs at risk.