The real life experience goes on: update after 4 years on the first cohort treated with lanadelumab at our center.

Introduction: Lanadelumab is a first-line long-term prophylaxis (LTP) in hereditary angioedema (HAE). Real-life data on its long-term efficacy and safety are limited. It is unknown whether patients using lanadelumab need short-term prophylaxis (STP). Objectives: To provide 4-year follow-up data for our first 34 patients treating with lanadelumab. Methods: Patients were assessed for their current injection interval, attacks, treatment satisfaction, disease control (AECT), quality of life impairment (AE-QoL), events that can induce attacks, and the use of STP since the start of their treatment with lanadelumab. Results: Of 34 patients who started lanadelumab treatment, 32 were still using it after 4 years, with a median injection interval of 33 (range 14-90) days. HAE patients (n=28) reported longer intervals, i.e. 35 (14-90) days, than patients with angioedema due to acquired C1 inhibitor deficiency (n=4, 23 (14-31) days). With their current injection intervals, used for a mean duration of 29 ± 17 months, patients reported a yearly attack rate of 0.3 ± 0.1. More than 70% of patients were attack-free since starting their current injection interval. All patients reported well-controlled disease, i.e. ≥10 points in the AECT; 21 patients had complete control (16 points). AE-QoL scores improved further compared to our initial report, most prominently in the fears/shame domain (-6 points). Treatment satisfaction was very high. No angioedema occurred after 146 of 147 potentially attack-inducing medical procedures without STP. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the long-term efficacy and safety of lanadelumab in real-life and question the need for STP in patients who use effective LTP.

Non-Skin Related Symptoms Are Common in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria and Linked to Active and Uncontrolled Disease: Results From the Chronic Urticaria Registry.

BACKGROUND: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) can present with non-skin related symptoms (NSRS), including recurrent unexplained fever, joint, bone, or muscle pain (JBMP), and malaise, which also occur in other conditions that manifest with wheals (eg, urticarial vasculitis or autoinflammatory disorders) or without wheals (eg, infection). OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the rate of patients with CSU affected by fever, JBMP, and malaise, their trigger factors, links with clinical and laboratory characteristics, and their impact on everyday life and treatment responses. METHODS: We analyzed baseline data from the Chronic Urticaria Registry of 2,521 patients with CSU who were aged 16 years or older. RESULTS: One third of CSU patients (31.2%; 786 of 2,521) had one or more NSRS, including recurrent fever (5.3%), JBMP (19.1%), and/or malaise (18.6%). In a multivariable analysis, having one or more of these NSRS correlated with food and infection as trigger factors of urticaria (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.7 and 1.5), wheals of 24 hours or greater duration (aOR = 2.5), sleep disturbance (aOR = 2.4), anxiety (aOR = 2.8), comorbid atopic dermatitis (aOR = 2.1), gastrointestinal disease (aOR = 1.8), elevated leukocytes (aOR = 1.7) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (aOR = 1.5). In a bivariate analysis, these NSRS were additionally associated with higher disease activity (weekly Urticaria Activity Score, median: 21 vs 14; P = .009), longer disease duration (years, median: 2 vs 1; P = .001), the presence of angioedema (74.6% vs 58.7%; P < .001), worse quality of life (Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire, median: 42 vs 29; P < .001) and more frequent poor control of CSU (78% vs 69%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of NSRS in a subpopulation of patients with CSU points to the need for better control of the disease, exclusion of comorbid conditions, and/or exclusion of urticarial vasculitis and urticarial autoinflammatory diseases.

A Core Outcome Set for Efficacy of Acute Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials investigating drugs for the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks have assessed many different outcomes. This heterogeneity limits the comparability of trial results and may lead to selective outcome reporting bias and a high burden on trial participants. OBJECTIVE: To achieve consensus on a core outcome set composed of key outcomes that ideally should be used in all clinical efficacy trials involving the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks. METHODS: We conducted a Delphi consensus study involving all relevant parties: patients with hereditary angioedema, hereditary angioedema expert clinicians and clinical researchers, pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory bodies. Two Internet-based survey rounds were conducted. In round 1, panelists indicated the importance of individual outcomes used in clinical trials on a 9-point Likert scale. Based on these results, a core outcome set was developed and voted on by panelists in round 2. RESULTS: A total of 58 worldwide panelists completed both rounds. The first round demonstrated high importance scores and substantial agreement among the panelists. In the second round, a consensus of 90% or greater was achieved on a core outcome set consisting of five key outcomes: change in overall symptom severity at one predetermined time point between 15 minutes and 4 hours after treatment, time to end of progression of all symptoms, the need for rescue medication during the entire attack, impairment of daily activities, and treatment satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: This international study obtained a high level of consensus on a core outcome set for the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks, consisting of five key outcomes.

Monitoring recurrent angioedema: Findings from the Turkish angioedema control test validation study.

BACKGROUND: Determination of control level in recurrent angioedema (RAE) is necessary to guide management. Here, we validated a Turkish version of the angioedema control test (AECT) for 4-week (AECT-4wk) and for 3-month (AECT-3mth) and assessed their utility in monitoring RAE. METHOD: The recommended structured translation process for patient-reported outcome measures was completed. The final versions were administered to 51 patients with mast cell-mediated angioedema (MMAE) and 38 patients with hereditary angioedema, and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was determined. Additionally, anchor surveys comprising angioedema activity score for 28 days (AAS-28 day), visual analog score for angioedema control, Likert scale for the control level from the patient's perspective (LS-AEC), angioedema quality of life, short form-12 (SF-12) and patients' assessment of treatment sufficiency were applied. RESULTS: The Turkish AECT versions showed good convergent validity with a substantial correlation with anchor tools and known-group validity. Excellent internal consistency and reproducibility were observed. Equal or more than 10 of 16 points scored with the AECT-4wk and AECT-3mth identified patients with well-controlled disease. The disease activity, control and burden parameters were consistent with the disease control level defined depending on the cut-off point 10 of AECT. Three-point changes in AECT-4wk and -3 mt could detect MCID in disease control in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Turkish AECT versions are valid and reliable tools for assessing and monitoring disease control in patients with RAE. The use of the Turkish versions of the AECT in routine patient care, clinical trials and angioedema research is recommended.

Development and Validation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess Disease Control in Chronic Prurigo.

Importance: Chronic prurigo (CPG), including prurigo nodularis, is a difficult disease to treat and considerably affects patients' quality of life. Helping patients obtain control of CPG is a major treatment goal. Objective: To develop and validate the Prurigo Control Test (PCT), a tool for assessing disease control in CPG, and to identify a cutoff value for controlled disease to aid treatment decisions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study followed the current recommendations for patient-reported outcome measure development in the generation and validation of the PCT. The final PCT was obtained after item generation, followed by reduction and selection, and was then tested for internal consistency and test-retest reliability, convergent validity, known-group validity, screening accuracy, and banding. The item-generation phase resulted in an unselected list of 69 potential PCT items. Impact analysis, interitem correlation, and review for content (face) validity resulted in final set of 5 PCT items. The validation study was performed among patients across 2 expert centers in Germany. Data were analyzed from February 2017 to November 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: A 5-item PCT with a recall period of 2 weeks was developed. A cutoff value of 10 points or higher was determined as suitable for identifying patients with well-controlled vs poorly controlled CPG. Results: Of the 95 patients included in the validation study, the median (range) age was 63 (19-87) years, 50 patients (53%) were women, and the median (range) disease duration was 72 (9-774) months. The validation study yielded good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach α, 0.86) and a high degree of convergent validity. The PCT demonstrated good known-group validity and could discriminate between patients who differed in prurigo control. Test-retest reliability was high, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.94, indicating excellent reproducibility. Conclusions and Relevance: This qualitative study showed that the PCT is able to assess disease control in patients with CPG. Its retrospective approach, brevity, and simple scoring likely make the PCT suitable for clinical practice and trials.

CRUSE® -An innovative mobile application for patient monitoring and management in chronic spontaneous urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is unpredictable and can severely impair patients' quality of life. Patients with CSU need a convenient, user-friendly platform to complete patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on their mobile devices. CRUSE® , the Chronic Urticaria Self Evaluation app, aims to address this unmet need. METHODS: CRUSE® was developed by an international steering committee of urticaria specialists. Priorities for the app based on recent findings in CSU were defined to allow patients to track and record their symptoms and medication use over time and send photographs. The CRUSE® app collects patient data such as age, sex, disease onset, triggers, medication, and CSU characteristics that can be sent securely to physicians, providing real-time insights. Additionally, CRUSE® contains PROMs to assess disease activity and control, which are individualised to patient profiles and clinical manifestations. RESULTS: CRUSE® was launched in Germany in March 2022 and is now available for free in 17 countries. It is adapted to the local language and displays a country-specific list of available urticaria medications. English and Ukrainian versions are available worldwide. From July 2022 to June 2023, 25,710 observations were documented by 2540 users; 72.7% were females, with a mean age of 39.6 years. At baseline, 93.7% and 51.3% of users had wheals and angioedema, respectively. Second-generation antihistamines were used in 74.0% of days. CONCLUSIONS: The initial data from CRUSE® show the wide use and utility of effectively tracking patients' disease activity and control, paving the way for personalised CSU management.

Efficacy and safety of on-demand versus daily rupatadine in chronic spontaneous urticaria: A randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Non-sedating H1 -antihistamines (nsAH) are the most commonly used treatment for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Many patients use them as on-demand (OD) therapy rather than a maintenance treatment. Here, we compared OD versus daily maintenance treatment with the nsAH rupatadine, assessed the efficacy of rupatadine updosing, and investigated potential long-term disease-modifying effects. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized study consisted of 2 weeks of screening, 8 weeks of double-blind treatment, and 6 weeks of treatment-free follow-up (OD allowed). Adult patients were randomized to 10 mg rupatadine OD or 10 mg rupatadine daily. At Week 4, if patients did not have a complete response, they switched from 10 to 20 mg rupatadine daily or underwent sham updosing (patients on 10 mg rupatadine OD). The primary aim was to compare CSU disease activity at the end of follow-up between daily versus OD. Additionally, we assessed the efficacy of rupatadine updosing. Major outcomes were disease activity, CSU-related quality of life (QoL), and disease control. RESULTS: At Week 4, disease activity and QoL significantly improved in daily versus OD-treated patients. Updosing of rupatadine did not improve the mean disease activity, but the number of complete responders increased during updosing from 5% to 22%. At the end of follow-up, the disease activity of patients treated OD versus daily was not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Daily rupatadine treatment significantly improved CSU disease activity and QoL during treatment versus OD treatment but not after discontinuation of rupatadine, indicating the benefits of a daily maintenance nsAH schedule.

Comorbid Inducible Urticaria Is Linked to Non-Autoimmune Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: CURE Insights.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) can have comorbid inducible urticaria (CIndU). How comorbid CIndU affects patients and their CSU is largely unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare patients with CSU with and without comorbid CIndUs for differences in demographic features, clinical characteristics, and laboratory markers. METHODS: We analyzed 708 patients with CSU of our Urticaria Center of Reference and Excellence enrolled in CURE, the chronic urticaria registry. CURE data collected until October 2022 were used to compare patients with and without comorbid CIndU for their demographic characteristics, disease onset, activity, impact, and control, as well as concomitant allergic and autoimmune diseases and laboratory parameters associated with autoimmune CSU. RESULTS: Of 708 patients with CSU, 247 (35%) had comorbid CIndU. Compared with patients with standalone CSU, patients with CSU with comorbid CIndU were significantly younger, had earlier disease onset, longer disease duration, higher impact on quality of life, and a higher rate of concomitant allergic diseases. Moreover, patients with CSU with comorbid CIndU less often had features linked to autoimmune CSU such as angioedema, concomitant autoimmune diseases, eosinopenia, low levels of total IgE, and low total IgE combined with elevated anti-thyroid peroxidase IgG. CONCLUSIONS: Autoimmune CSU may be less common in patients with comorbid CIndU than without, and comorbid CIndU may point to autoallergic CSU.

CRUSE - What the first 100 days have taught us.

Introduction: Health apps play an increasing role in everyday healthcare, especially for chronic diseases. The Chronic Urticaria Self Evaluation (CRUSE) is a new mobile health app for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients, which replaces disease tracking via paper and pen, thus making disease monitoring more convenient, increasing tracking compliance, and improving data quality and access. Methods: CRUSE enables patients to complete patient-reported outcome measures on their smartphone and send the results, along with current medication and pictures, to their treating physician via email. CRUSE captures the urticaria (UAS) and angioedema activity (AAS) scores and the urticaria and angioedema control tests (UCT and AECT). In this work, a descriptive analysis of CRUSE users and reported days was performed. The global network of Urticaria Centers of Reference and Excellence (UCARE) provides the app and its data. Results: CRUSE is now available in Germany, Switzerland, Austria, the UK, Italy, Spain, France, and Turkey. Of 620 newly registered users (from July 1st until November 18th of 2022), 72 % were female, and the mean age was 36.6 years (17 - 78 years). The average daily UAS and AAS value (mean ± standard deviation) were 2.1 ± 1.9 and 7.2 ± 3.3, respectively. Most CRUSE patients had poorly controlled disease, with mean UCT values of 7.0 ± 4.4 and mean AECT values of 8.1 ± 4.5. Conclusion: The first days of patients with CSU using CRUSE confirm the high need for an app that helps to monitor disease activity, impact, and control. The first results indicate low levels of disease control in most CRUSE users, with low UCT and AECT values. Future analyses will assess follow-up documentation data and evaluate the effects of treatment changes on CSU activity, impact, and control.

Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the angioedema control test.

BACKGROUND: The Angioedema Control Test (AECT) is a patient-reported outcome measure developed and validated for the assessment of disease control in patients with recurrent angioedema. Its sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) have hitherto not been established. METHODS: Patients with recurrent angioedema due to chronic spontaneous urticaria, hereditary angioedema, or acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency were repeatedly asked to complete the AECT along with the Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (AE-QoL), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and anchors for disease control and whether treatment was sufficient during routine care visits. The sensitivity to the change of the AECT was determined by correlating changes in its scores over time with changes in the applied anchors. The MCID was determined using anchor-based and distributional criterion-based approaches. RESULTS: Eighty-six cases were used for this analysis. Changes in AECT scores correlated well with AE-QoL changes (but less with changes in the DLQI) as well as other applied anchors, demonstrating its sensitivity to change. The MCID was found to be three points for improvement of angioedema control. The available number of cases with meaningful deterioration in our dataset was too low to reach a definite conclusion on the MCID for deterioration of angioedema control. CONCLUSION: The AECT is a valuable tool to assess changes in disease control in patients with recurrent angioedema over time. The lowest AECT score change that reflects a meaningful improvement of disease control to patients (MCID) is three points.

Patients With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Who Have Wheals, Angioedema, or Both, Differ Demographically, Clinically, and in Response to Treatment-Results From CURE.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) have spontaneous wheals (W), angioedema (AE), or both, for longer than 6 weeks. Clinical differences between patients with standalone W, standalone AE, and W and AE (W+AE) remain incompletely understood. OBJECTIVE: To compare W, AE, and W+AE CSU patients regarding demographics, disease characteristics, comorbidities, disease burden, and treatment response. METHODS: Baseline data from 3,698 CSU patients in the ongoing, prospective, international, multicenter, observational Chronic Urticaria REgistry (CURE) were analyzed (data cut: September 2022). RESULTS: Across all CSU patients, 59%, 36%, and 5% had W+AE, W, and AE, respectively. The W+AE patients, compared with W and AE patients, showed the lowest male-to-female ratio (0.33), higher rates of concomitant psychiatric disease (17% vs 11% vs 6%, respectively), autoimmune disease (13% vs 7% vs 9%, respectively), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) hypersensitivity (9% vs 5% vs 2%, respectively) and the highest disease impact. The W patients, compared with W+AE and AE patients, showed the lowest rates of concomitant hypertension (15% vs 21% vs 40%, respectively) and obesity (11% vs 16% vs 17%, respectively), the highest rate of concomitant inducible urticaria (24% vs 22% vs 6%, respectively), and shorter W duration. The AE patients, compared with W+AE and W patients, were older at disease onset, showed longer AE duration, and the best response to increased doses of H1-antihistamines (58% vs 24% vs 31%, respectively) and omalizumab (92% vs 67% vs 60%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide a better understanding of CSU phenotypes and may guide patient care and research efforts that aim to link them to pathogenic drivers.

The 7-day recall period version of the Urticaria Control Test-UCT7.

BACKGROUND: The Urticaria Control Test (UCT) is a well-established, very easy to use and calculate 4-item patient-reported outcome measure to assess chronic urticaria disease control during the previous 4 weeks. Clinical trials and practice may benefit from the use of a UCT version with a shorter recall period, but this does not exist. OBJECTIVES: We sought to develop and validate a UCT version with a 7-day recall period, the UCT7. METHODS: The UCT7 was developed, based on the UCT, and tested, in 152 patients with chronic urticaria (spontaneous: n = 101, inducible: n = 51) for its reliability, validity and screening accuracy, and clinimetric properties, in other words, the cutoff for well-controlled disease and the minimal clinically important difference. RESULTS: The UCT7 showed excellent internal consistency reliability with a Cronbach αvalue of 0.91 and test-retest reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83. Convergent validity was high and strongly correlated with anchors of disease control, wheal and angioedema frequency, and urticaria-related quality of life impairment. The UCT7 showed excellent sensitivity to change; however, changes in angioedema activity and impact did not correlate well with changes in UCT7. Based on receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, the proportion of correctly classified patients, and patients' assessment of treatment efficacy, we recommend a cutoff value of 12 points for identifying patients with well-controlled disease. The UCT7 minimal clinically important difference for improvement was estimated to be 2 points. CONCLUSIONS: The UCT7 is a validated 7-day recall period version of the UCT. It is ideal for the assessment of disease control at short intervals in patients with chronic urticaria in clinical studies and practice.

Content validation and psychometric evaluation of the Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire for hereditary angioedema.

BACKGROUND: There is considerable burden of illness in hereditary angioedema (HAE). However, instruments to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in HAE are limited. The Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (AE-QoL) was developed to measure HRQoL in patients with recurrent angioedema; the validity of the AE-QoL in patients with HAE is described. METHODS: To identify disease-related experiences with a focus on the impact of HAE on HRQoL, interviews were conducted with a group of clinician experts and patients with HAE from Canada, France, Germany, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States, along with a targeted literature review. Concepts were mapped to the AE-QoL to assess item relevance, interpretation, and conceptual coverage. Cognitive interviews assessed item clarity and relevance. A psychometric validation was performed using data from a phase 3 trial. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with seven clinicians and 40 adult patients. Patients reported 35 unique impacts of HAE on their lives, the most frequent being on work/school, social relationships, physical activities, and emotions, particularly fear/worrying and anxiety. Saturation for these impacts was reached, and all concepts covered in the AE-QoL were reported during the interviews. Patients agreed that the questionnaire items and response options were clear and relevant, and the 4-week recall period was appropriate. The psychometric validation included data from 64 patients. For AE-QoL total scores, excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.90), test-retest reliability (intraclass coefficient > 0.80), convergent validity with the Sheehan Disability Scale (r = 0.663), divergent validity with the EQ-5D-5L index (r = 0.292) and EQ-VAS (r = 0.337), and known-groups validity (p < 0.0001; ɳ2 = 0.56) were demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative and psychometric analyses showed that the AE-QoL is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring HRQoL in adult patients with HAE from six countries.

Long-term lanadelumab treatment improves health-related quality of life in patients with hereditary angioedema.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is associated with a substantial disease burden. Lanadelumab reduced the HAE attack rate during 132 weeks of follow-up in the HELP open-label extension (OLE) Study (NCT02741596). OBJECTIVE: To measure the impact of long-term lanadelumab treatment on patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS: Rollover patients (completed the 26-week HELP study [NCT02586805]) and nonrollovers (newly enrolled) received lanadelumab 300 mg every 2 weeks. PROs (Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire [AE-QoL], Short Form Health Survey 12-item version 2, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-General Health Questionnaire, and EQ-5D-5L questionnaire) were assessed at baseline (day 0 of HELP OLE) and various time points until the end-of-study visit. The Angioedema Control Test, Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication, and Global Impression of Treatment Response were administered starting at week 52. RESULTS: The mean (SD) change in AE-QoL total score from baseline to end-of-study for rollovers (n = 90) was -10.2 (17.9), exhibiting further improvement from HELP in health-related quality of life (HRQoL); 48.9% of rollovers achieved the previously defined 6-point minimal clinically important difference. Nonrollovers (n = 81) reported a change of -19.5 (21.3). Controlled disease (Angioedema Control Test total score ≥10) was reported by 90.2% of rollovers and 95.9% of nonrollovers at the end of the study. Excellent treatment response was reported by 78.7% of patients and 82.4% of investigators. Results from other PROs indicated a slight improvement in anxiety, a high level of satisfaction with treatment, and increased work productivityor activity. CONCLUSION: Clinically meaningful improvement in HRQoL was exhibited with long-term lanadelumab treatment, supporting the benefit of lanadelumab therapy associated with attack prevention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02586805 (HELP Study) and NCT02741596 (HELP open-label extension).

Inhibition of interleukin-1 with rilonacept is not effective in cold urticaria-Results of a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Cold urticaria (ColdU) is characterized by pruritic wheals following exposure of the skin to cold. Many patients show insufficient response to antihistamines, the first line treatment. Based on the high efficacy of interleukin-1(IL-1)-inhibition in cold-induced urticarial autoinflammatory diseases, we assessed the effects of rilonacept, an IL-1 inhibitor, in ColdU patients unresponsive to standard treatment. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled two-center study, we included 20 patients with ColdU. In the first part, patients received 320 mg rilonacept or placebo (1:1) followed by weekly doses of 160 mg rilonacept or placebo for 6 weeks. In the second part, all patients received weekly 160 mg or 320 mg rilonacept for 6 weeks, open-label. The primary endpoint was change in critical temperature threshold (CTT). Secondary endpoints included changes in quality of life impairment (Dermatology Life Quality Index, DLQI), differences of inflammatory mediators upon cold provocation and safety assessment over the study period. RESULTS: Baseline mean CTTs were 20.2°C (placebo) and 17.3°C (rilonacept). Mean CTTs did not change significantly during the 6-week double-blind treatment (placebo - 0.45°C; rilonacept +0.89°C). IL-6, IL-18 and HSP-70 blood levels showed interindividual variability without significant changes during hand cold water bath provocation in placebo- or rilonacept-treated patients. In contrast, DLQI significantly improved in the rilonacept (mean DLQI reduction of 3.8; p = 0.002) but not in the placebo group (mean DLQI reduction of 0). Comparing baseline with the rilonacept open-label treatment, there were no changes in CTTs or DLQI scores. CONCLUSION: IL-1 inhibition with rilonacept did not improve ColdU, but demonstrated a good safety profile. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2012-005726-30. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT02171416.

The validity and reliability of a Thai version of the Angioedema Control Test: Which recall period is preferable?

BACKGROUND: The Angioedema Control Test (AECT) is a questionnaire that monitors disease control in patients with angioedema, with a recall period of 4 weeks (AECT-4wk) or 3 months (AECT-3mo). OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the psychometric properties of a Thai version of the AECT. METHODS: Of 54 patients, 46, 5, 2, and 1 had recurrent angioedema with chronic spontaneous urticaria, hereditary angioedema, idiopathic histaminergic angioedema, and acquired angioedema due to C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency, respectively. The AECT, Angioedema Activity Score (AAS), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (AE-QoL), and anchors for disease control (numeric rating scale [NRS] and patient global assessment-Likert scale [PatGA-LS]) were used. The patients rated the efficacy of their treatment. RESULTS: Fifty-four and 47 patients completed the AECT-4wk and AECT-3mo, respectively. Both AECT versions showed significant correlations with disease activity (AAS, r = 0.6-0.8), disease control (NRS and PatGA-LS, r = 0.7-0.9), and quality of life impairment (DLQI and AE-QoL, r = 0.6-0.8). Higher correlations were found for the AECT-4wk than for the AECT-3mo. Excellent internal consistency (alpha = 0.98 and 0.97, respectively) and intraclass correlation (0.96 and 0.94, respectively) were found. A cutoff ≥ 10 was confirmed to identify patients with well-controlled disease for both AECT versions (AUCs = 0.89 and 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: The Thai version of the AECT is a valid and reliable tool for clinical practice. Due to the shorter recall period, the AECT-4wk may be more accurate than, and preferable to, the AECT-3mo. A cutoff ≥ 10 should be used to identify patients with well-controlled disease.

The Benefit of Complete Response to Treatment in Patients With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria-CURE Results.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a distressing disease. We report real-world data from the global Chronic Urticaria Registry (CURE) about associations between various CSU states and sleep impairment, plus important health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes and compared different methods to assess CSU states. METHODS: CURE data were collected at baseline and 6-monthly follow-ups (FU). Assessments included CSU states using the Urticaria Control Test (UCT), weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7), and Physician Global Assessment (PhyGA) of treatment response. Complete response to treatment (CR, UAS7 = 0), complete control of disease (CC, UCT = 16), and PhyGA = CR were assessed, plus the Dermatology Life Quality Index and the Chronic Urticaria Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (CU-Q2oL) sleep domain. RESULTS: Overall, 2078 patients were included. At baseline, 9.8%, 17.9%, and 42.3% of patients had UCT = 16, UAS7 = 0, or PhyGA = CR, respectively, which increased at FU1 and FU2. Patients with higher UCT scores had better sleep and HRQoL. The presence of angioedema without wheals, episodic disease, omalizumab treatment, and male sex were associated with CC (P < .05). Among 469 patients who achieved CC or CR, 16.4% (n = 77) showed CC or CR with all 3 instruments. Agreement between UCT = 16 and UAS7 = 0 measurements was moderate (κ = 0.581), but poor between UCT = 16 and PhyGA = CR (κ = 0.208). CONCLUSIONS: Few patients had CR/CC of their CSU at baseline entry. Disease control strongly related to good sleep and better HRQoL; therefore, it is important to aim for CR in CSU treatment. Patient-reported UCT and UAS7 assessments demonstrated a more accurate measurement of CSU state versus physician assessments.