Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Plant Cell Environ ; 36(10): 1755-70, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23586649

ABSTRACT

Estimation of the maximum chlorophyll fluorescence yield under illumination, or Fm', by traditional single saturation pulse (SP) methodology is prone to underestimation error because of rapid turnover within photosystem (PS) II. However, measurements of fluorescence yield during several single pulses of variable intensity describes the irradiance dependence of apparent Fm', from which estimates of Fm' at infinite irradiance can be derived. While such estimates have been shown to result in valid approximations of Fm', the need to apply several single pulses limits its applicability. We introduce a novel approach that determines the relationship between apparent Fm' and variable irradiance within a single ∼1 s multiphase flash (MPF). Through experiments and simulations, we demonstrate that the rate of variation in irradiance during an MPF is critical for achieving quasi-steady-state changes in the proportions of PSII acceptor side redox intermediates and the corresponding fluorescence yields, which are prerequisites for accurately estimating Fm' at infinite irradiance. The MPF methodology is discussed in the context of improving the accuracy of various parameters derived from chlorophyll fluorescence measurements, such as photochemical and non-photochemical quenchings and efficiencies. The importance of using MPF methodology for interpreting chlorophyll fluorescence, in particular for integrating fluorescence and gas exchange measurements, is emphasized.


Subject(s)
Chlorophyll/metabolism , Helianthus/metabolism , Photobiology/methods , Zea mays/metabolism , Computer Simulation , Electron Transport , Fluorescence , Gases/metabolism , Kinetics , Mesophyll Cells/metabolism , Photochemical Processes , Photosystem II Protein Complex/metabolism
2.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 126(12): 1634-9, 1995 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7499664

ABSTRACT

The authors compared the effects of chlorhexidine gluconate, an antiseptic mouthwash with essential oils and water on the bacterial aerosol contamination generated by an air polishing device. Patients rinsed with one of the three solutions before treatment. Bacterial counts collected during the treatment indicate that the chlorhexidine pretreatment rinse was significantly more effective than the other solutions in reducing bacterial aerosols.


Subject(s)
Air Microbiology , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology , Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives , Dental High-Speed Technique , Mouthwashes/chemistry , Adult , Aerosols , Air Pollution, Indoor/prevention & control , Analysis of Variance , Bacteria/drug effects , Chlorhexidine/pharmacology , Colony Count, Microbial , Dental Offices , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Salicylates/pharmacology , Single-Blind Method , Terpenes/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...