Does 4 MV perform better compared to 6 MV in the presence of air cavities in the head and neck region?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The underdose near air cavities in the head and neck region at photon energies of 4 MV and 6 MV was studied in search for clinical advantages of the 4 MV over 6 MV treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The on-axis and off-axis dose distributions were measured with a parallel-plate ionization chamber and films in polystyrene phantoms containing an air cavity of appropriate size based on the results of computed tomography scans. RESULTS: Although most results are similar for both energies, the 4 MV photon beams give a somewhat smaller underdose effect and a faster re-build up than the 6 MV. For both energies a significant underdose effect was observed at the edge of the field in the larynx phantom. This proved to be true for small and large fields, for smaller and larger cavities, for one-beam as well as parallel-opposed beams. CONCLUSION: For most clinically relevant situations there is no remarkable benefit in the use of either of the two energies.

IMRT treatment planning:- a comparative inter-system and inter-centre planning exercise of the ESTRO QUASIMODO group.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was a comparison of realistic IMRT plans based on the same CT-image data set and a common predefined set of dose objectives for the planning target volume and the organs at risk. This work was part of the larger European QUASIMODO IMRT verification project. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven IMRT plans were produced by nine different European groups, each applying a representative set of clinically used IMRT treatment planning systems. The plans produced were to be deliverable in a clinically acceptable treatment time with the local technical equipment. All plans were characterized using a set of different quality measures such as dose-volume histograms, number of monitor units and treatment time. RESULTS: Only one plan was able to fulfil all dose objectives strictly; six plans failed some of the objectives but were still considered to be clinically acceptable; four plans were not able to reach the objectives. Additional quality scores such as the number of monitor units and treatment time showed large variations, which mainly depend on the delivery technique. CONCLUSION: The presented planning study showed that with nearly all presently available IMRT planning and delivery systems comparable dose distributions could be achieved if the planning goals are clearly defined in advance.

An accurate calibration method of the multileaf collimator valid for conformal and intensity modulated radiation treatments.

Because for IMRT treatments the required accuracy on leaf positioning is high, conventional calibration methods may not be appropriate. The aim of this study was to develop the tools for an accurate MLC calibration valid for conventional and IMRT treatments and to investigate the stability of the MLC. A strip test consisting of nine adjacent segments 2 cm wide, separated by 1 mm and exposed on Kodak X-Omat V films at Dmax depth, was used for detecting leaf-positioning errors. Dose profiles along the leaf-axis were taken for each leaf-pair. We measured the dose variation on each abutment to quantify the relative positioning error (RPE) and the absolute position of the abutment to quantify the absolute positioning error (APE). The accuracy of determining the APE and RPE was 0.15 and 0.04 mm, respectively. Using the RPE and the APE the MLC calibration parameters were calculated in order to obtain a flat profile on the abutment at the correct position. A conventionally calibrated Elekta MLC was re-calibrated using the strip test. The stability of the MLC and leaf-positioning reproducibility was investigated exposing films with 25 adjacent segments 1 cm wide during three months and measuring the standard deviation of the RPE values. A maximum shift over the three months of 0.27 mm was observed and the standard deviation of the RPE values was 0.11 mm.