Importance of left atrial appendage flow as a predictor of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of transoesophageal echocardiography in predicting subsequent thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Transoesophageal echocardiography was performed in 88 patients with documented paroxysmal (n=53) or chronic atrial fibrillation (n=35) to assess morphological and functional predictors of thromboembolic events. Prospective selection was from patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who had undergone transoesophageal echocardiography because of previous thromboembolism (n=30); prior to electrical cardioversion (n=31); or for other reasons (n=27). All patients were followed up for 1 year. RESULTS: During the period of follow-up new thromboembolic events occurred in 18 of 88 patients (20%/year); 16 of these patients had a stroke and two a peripheral embolism. Univariate analysis revealed that previous thromboembolism (P<0.005; odds ratio 5.3 [CI 1.9, 12. 1]), history of hypertension (P<0.01; odds ratio 4.0 [CI 1.4, 10.4), presence of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (P<0.025; odds ratio 3.5 [CI 1.2, 10.0]), and presence of left atrial appendage peak velocity

Transesophageal echocardiographic predictors for maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

The aim of this study was to assess the value of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with atrial fibrillation in predicting restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion. TEE was performed in 62 patients with atrial fibrillation before their first elective cardioversion. Clinical variables evaluated were: age, gender, duration, and etiology of atrial fibrillation. TEE variables included: left atrial (LA) length, width, and size, LA annulus size, as well as presence of LA spontaneous contrast, thrombus and mitral regurgitation, LA appendage size and flow, and left ventricular function. Based on initial outcome of cardioversion, patients were grouped into patients who remained in atrial fibrillation and in whom sinus rhythm was restored. The latter group of patients was followed for 1 year, and grouped into patients who reverted to atrial fibrillation and in whom sinus rhythm was maintained. Successful cardioversion was achieved in 50 of 62 patients (81%). None of the clinical or TEE variables were related to initial outcome. At 1-year follow-up, 29 of 50 patients (58%) who underwent successful cardioversion continued to have sinus rhythm. The following variables were related to maintenance of sinus rhythm: duration of atrial fibrillation (6.7 +/- 7.3 vs 2.0 +/- 2.4 months; p < 0.005); LA length (6.2 +/- 0.7 vs. 5.5 +/- 1.0 cm; p < 0.008); width (5.1 +/- 0.5 vs. 4.5 +/- 0.7 cm; p < 0.002); size (26.4 +/- 5.0 vs 19.8 +/- 6.5 cm2; p < 0.0005); annulus size (4.0 +/- 0.2 vs 3.7 +/- 0.3 cm; p < 0.0005); presence of LA spontaneous contrast (13 [62%] vs 4 [14%]; p < 0.002), and LA appendage flow (19 +/- 8 vs 36 +/- 15 cm/s; p < 0.0005). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, LA annulus size, but especially LA appendage flow, were significantly associated with maintenance of sinus rhythm. Thus, in TEE-guided electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation, variables often used to assess thromboembolic risk may also be used to predict 1-year outcome of cardioversion.

[Trans-esophageal contrast echocardiography in suspicion of paradoxal embolism]. / Transoesofageale contrast-echocardiografie bij vermoeden van paradoxe embolie.

In two patients, women of 35 and 74 years old, paradoxical embolism was diagnosed. Patient A presented with multiple pulmonary embolism. Transoesophageal echocardiography demonstrated a thrombus mass which protruded from the right atrium through a patent foramen ovale into the left atrium: explicit proof of the possibility of paradoxical embolism. Patient B presented with systemic arterial embolism. During hospitalisation multiple pulmonary embolism occurred. With the use of transoesophageal contrast echocardiography a patent foramen ovale was observed, the probable cause of paradoxical embolism. Both patients were treated with intravenous heparin and oral anticoagulants.