Telemedicine in Drug Hypersensitivity.

This review focuses on the current applications of telemedicine for drug hypersensitivity reactions. Telemedicine holds promise as a tool to risk-stratify patients with drug hypersensitivity, for both evaluation of penicillin allergies and severe cutaneous adverse reactions. Although telemedicine may not fully replace in-person assessment owing to the need for testing, challenges, and in-person physical examination or skin biopsy, it may allow for risk stratification whereby some in-person visits may not be necessary. Electronic consults have also emerged along with telemedicine as a tool for drug allergy evaluations.

Injury and Liability Associated With Spine Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although spine surgery is associated with significant morbidity, the anesthesia liability profile for spine surgery is not known. We examined claims for spine procedures in the Anesthesia Closed Claims Project database to evaluate patterns of injury and liability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed. Inclusion criteria were anesthesia claims provided for surgical procedures in 2000 to 2014. We compared mechanisms of injury for cervical spine to thoracic or lumbar spine procedures using χ and the Fisher exact test. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine factors associated with permanent disabling injury in spine surgery claims. RESULTS: The 207 spine procedure (73% thoracic/lumbar; 27% cervical) claims comprised >10% of claims. Permanent disabling injuries to nerves, the spinal cord, and the eyes or visual pathways were more common with spine procedures than in nonspine procedures. Hemorrhage and positioning injuries were more common in thoracic/lumbar spine claims, whereas difficult intubation was more common in cervical spine claims. Multiple logistic regression demonstrated prone positioning (odds ratio=3.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-9.43) and surgical duration of ≥4 hours increased the odds of severe permanent injury in spine claims (odds ratio=2.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-6.72). CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesia claims related to spine surgery were associated with severe permanent disability primarily from nerve and eye injuries. Prone positioning and surgical duration of ≥4 hours were associated with permanent disabling injuries. Attention to positioning, resuscitation during blood loss, and reducing length of surgery may reduce these complications.

Socioeconomic status and survival from ventricular fibrillation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

PURPOSE: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major cause of death in the United States. How individual-level socioeconomic status (SES) influences survival is uncertain. METHODS: The investigation is a retrospective cohort study of adults who suffered OHCA and presented with a shockable rhythm in a metropolitan county from January 1, 1999-December 31, 2005. Individual-level measures of SES were obtained from vital records and surveys. SES measures included education and occupation. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the independent association between SES measures and survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: Of the 1390 eligible OHCA patients, 374 (27%) survived to hospital discharge. Compared to those with less than high school diploma, the multivariable-adjusted odds ratio of survival was 1.36 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-2.14) for high school graduates, 1.54 (95% CI, 0.95-2.48) for those with some college, and 1.96 (95% CI, 1.17-3.27) for those with college degrees (test for trend across the categories P < .001). We did not observe an independent association between occupation and survival. CONCLUSIONS: Higher education was associated with greater survival after OHCA. This relationship was not explained by key demographic or clinical characteristics. A better understanding of the mechanism by which individual-level SES characteristics influence prognosis may provide opportunities to improve survival.

Sounding off on social media: the ethics of patient storytelling in the modern era.

Use of social networking programs like Facebook and Twitter, which enable the public sharing of diverse content over the Internet, has risen dramatically in recent years. Although health professionals have faced consequences for clearly unethical online behavior, a relatively unexamined practice among medical students is the disclosure of patient care stories on social media in a manner that is technically compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, yet is ethically questionable. In this Perspective, the authors review three such cases in which students do not specifically reveal a patient's identity but share details of a personal nature, motivated by a variety of intentions (e.g., a desire to reflect on a meaningful experience, reaching out for social support in the event of a patient's death). Using ethical principles and professional policy recommendations, they discuss aspects of these postings that are potentially problematic. Consequences include the possibility of undermining public trust in the profession, inadvertently identifying patients, and violating expectations of privacy. The authors recommend that medical schools explicitly address these issues across the preclinical and clinical curricula and emphasize that patient-related postings on social media may carry inherent risks both to patients and to the profession.