ABSTRACT
Purpose: Guidelines are published for referral to genetic counseling and multigene panel genetic testing for colorectal cancer. We hypothesize that these guidelines are not recognized in practice, resulting in the underreferral of patients to genetic counseling. We aimed to investigate the clinical impact of these guidelines. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted using a single academic-institution colorectal cancer patient registry. The registry included all patients ≥18 years old with a pathologic diagnosis of colon cancer, rectal cancer, or polyposis from January 2018 to January 2020 with complete chart data to determine inclusion into the genetic referral cohort. Results: Out of 225 colon cancer patients, 92 met criteria for referral to genetic testing, but only 56 patients obtained referral and 39 completed testing. For rectal cancer, 29 out of 127 patients met criteria for referral, but only 11 obtained referral and 8 completed testing. Actionable variants, defined as pathogenic or likely pathogenic, were identified in 18 colon cancer and 5 rectal cancer patients. Age made a significant difference in the referral rate for colon cancer (P = 0.02) but not rectal cancer (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates poor adherence to guideline-based genetic testing. These data emphasize the need for more consistent referral to genetic testing for diagnosis of underlying inherited cancer syndromes.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak is one of the most feared complications of gastrointestinal surgery. Surgeons routinely perform a diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) to protect high-risk colo-rectal anastomoses. STUDY DESIGN: The NSQIP database was queried from 2012 to 2013 for patients undergoing open ileo-colic resection with and without a DLI. The primary outcome was the development of any anastomotic leak-including those managed operatively and non-operatively. Secondary outcomes included overall complication rate, return to the OR, readmission, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Four thousand one hundred fifty-nine patients underwent open ileo-colic resection during the study period. One hundred eighty-six (4.5 %) underwent a DLI. Factors associated with the addition of a DLI included emergency surgery, pre-operative sepsis, and IBD. There were 197 anastomotic leaks (4.7 %) with 100 patients requiring reoperation (2.4 %). DLI was associated with a decrease in anastomotic leaks requiring reoperation (DLI vs no DLI: 0 (0 %) vs 100 (2.5 %); p = 0.02) and with increased readmission (OR 1.93; 95 % CI 1.30-2.85; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: DLI is rarely used for open ileo-colic resection. There were no serious leaks requiring reoperation in the DLI group. A DLI was associated with an almost two-fold increase in the odds of readmission. Surgeons must weigh the reduction in serious leak rate with postoperative morbidity when considering a DLI for open ileo-colic resection.
