Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) ; 31(3): 280-283, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29904288

ABSTRACT

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus is a proven therapy for typical atrial flutter (AFl); however, in some patients, new atrial arrhythmias (AA) may occur after AFl ablation. This study explored the difference in the occurrence of spontaneous AA after AFl ablation as a function of the patient's presenting rhythm on the day of the AFl ablation. A retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent AFl ablation at Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas was performed. A total of 188 subjects were included; 50% (94) presented in AFl (Group AFl) on the day of the ablation procedure and 94 presented in sinus rhythm (SR; Group SR). Group AFl patients were older (P < 0.001), more likely to have diabetes (P = 0.03), and more likely to have undergone previous heart surgery (P = 0.03). The median size of the left atrium was 4 cm (range 2.8-6.8) in Group AFl compared with 3.8 cm (range 2.6-5.6) in Group SR (P = 0.009). Atrial fibrillation was induced during the ablation procedure in 7.5% and 21.3% of patients in Groups AFl and SR, respectively (P = 0.007). Overall, 29 of 188 (15.4%) patients developed new AA within 1 year of the procedure, 13.8% in Group AFl vs 17.0% in Group SR (P = 0.57). In conclusion, patients presenting for AFl ablation in SR were younger and healthier but had more atrial fibrillation induced during their ablation procedure, with a trend toward more postablation AA due to additional arrhythmia substrate.

2.
Am J Cardiol ; 96(3): 414-6, 2005 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16054471

ABSTRACT

We performed a retrospective analysis of 250 records of consecutive, newly implanted, pacemaker patients from a single center to determine the rate of postimplant complications and observations discovered before and during the prehospital discharge evaluation. No observations occurred in 246 of 250 patients (98.4%) (1-sided 95% confidence interval 96.4%). Of the 250 patients, 4 had observations that were discovered at the prehospital discharge check and required reprogramming to increase the sensitivity safety margin (3 atrial and 1 ventricular). We documented only 1 complication that was discovered before the predischarge evaluation through telemetry and resulted in an atrial lead revision.


Subject(s)
Pacemaker, Artificial , Patient Discharge , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Equipment Failure , Humans , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...