Outcome following radiotherapy for head and neck basal cell carcinoma with 'aggressive' features.

OBJECTIVES: The literature demonstrates that 'aggressive' head-and-neck basal cell carcinomas (HN-BCC) have a higher than expected relapse rate with unfavorable outcomes. We report outcomes following definitive (dRT) or post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) for these tumors. METHODS: We reviewed all HN-BCC patients with 'aggressive' features (primary lesions diameter >10mm, >2 recurrences, or extra-cutaneous extension), treated with megavoltage dRT or PORT between 1998 and 2013. Loco-regional control (LRC) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were estimated using the competing risk method, and overall survival (OS) by Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable analysis explored factors associated with relapse. RESULTS: A total of 108 histologically confirmed 'aggressive' HN-BCC patients were identified, including 38 (35%) presenting de novo and 70 (65%) treated for recurrence (rBCC). dRT was offered to 72 (66.7%) patients and PORT to 36 (33.3%). Median follow-up was 3.5years. Actuarial 3-year LRC, RFS, and OS were 87% (95% confidence interval: 77-92), 82% (72-89), and 87% (80-94), respectively. LRC rates for dRT and PORT were similar [hazard ratio (HR) 0.61 (0.17-2.23), p=0.46]. Factors associated with higher risk of relapse were: rBCC [HR 7.96 (1.03-61.71), p=0.047], 'H-zone' (mid face, eyes, and ears) location [HR 3.13 (1.07-9.19), p=0.04], tumor size [HR 1.32 (1.08-1.6), p=0.006], nodal involvement [HR 3.68 (1.11-12.2), p=0.03] and stage [HR 3.13 (1.19-8.26), p=0.02]. CONCLUSION: RT is an effective treatment for 'aggressive' HN-BCC when used as a definitive modality or as PORT. Non-surgical management with definitive radiotherapy provides an alternative effective option if surgery is not used.

Limited-stage mantle cell lymphoma: treatment outcomes at the Princess Margaret Hospital.

Mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare cancer, with the majority of patients (pts) presenting in stage III-IV and the outcomes are poor. To determine the curability of localized MCL, we examine stage I-II pts at our institution between 1990-2007. 26 pts with stage I (38%) and stage II (62%) were referred. Sites involved were head and neck in 73%. Five had a blastoid variant. Five patients were treated with palliative intent. Analysis was focused on pts treated with a curative intent (21 pts): 17 CT+RT, 2 RT, 2 CT followed by ASCT. 13 patients received CHOP, 5-RCHOP, 1-CVP; most received 6 cycles. The RT median dose was 35Gy and IFRT for the majority. For 21 pts treated with a curative intent, median follow up was 5.8 years. The overall response rate was 95%. Among the 19 CR/CRu pts, 9 relapsed for a 5-year relapse rate of 46%. Relapses were mainly observed at distant sites, 3 were in GI tract, 1 had both local and distant relapse. Median PFS and OS were 3.2 and 6.4 years, respectively. 5-year OS was 62%. In univariate analysis, blastoid variant and stage II were prognostic factors for PFS. Multivariate analysis could not be performed due to the small sample size. With a treatment approach using combined CT+RT for stage I-II MCL, local control was achieved in 94%. Systemic relapse remains a significant problem, especially for stage II and blastoid variant. Radiotherapy should remain part of curative treatment plan in stage I-II MCL.

Identifying motivations and barriers to patient participation in clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed cancer patients' knowledge and attitudes towards clinical trials (CTs). METHODS: A survey was administered to 100/141 cancer outpatients. RESULTS: 82% respondents had heard of CTs, but many could only provide limited definitions and perceived them as high risk. About half had previously been approached to participate in a trial, and 67% had agreed to participate. Factors influencing participation in trials, barriers to recruitment, and suggestions for increased recruitment in clinical trials were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest general support of CTs. Education programs are needed to raise awareness, reduce fears, and dispel myths about CT participation.