Influence of endocervical specimen adequacy on PCR and direct fluorescent-antibody staining for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

The cellular quality of the endocervical swab specimen used for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis may dramatically impact the sensitivity of the diagnostic assay used. An evaluation of the adequacy of 319 endocervical swab specimens from women attending two inner-city sexually transmitted disease and family planning clinics, as well as five high school-based family planning clinics, was performed, and the resulting data were compared with the diagnostic results obtained by both Amplicor PCR and Microtrak direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) staining. The swab from each patient was rolled across the open circular area of a DFA slide and then used to inoculate a transport tube for PCR (Roche), after which the swab was discarded. The slides were stained and examined by epifluorescence microscopy for the presence of C. trachomatis elementary bodies and for the presence and number of cell types to determine specimen adequacy. Cellular adequacy for a cervical swab specimen was defined as the presence of one or more columnar epithelial or metaplastic epithelial cells or the presence of more than 100 erythrocytes per high-power microscopic field. Of the 319 specimens read by DFA, 204 (63.9%) were determined to be adequate. There were 34 (10.7%) positive specimens by DFA and/or PCR. Twenty-nine (9.1%) specimens were positive by PCR, 20 (6.3%) specimens were DFA positive, and 15 (4.7%) were concordantly positive by both tests. The prevalence of chlamydia among adequate specimens was 14.2% (29/204), compared to 4.3% (5/115) for inadequate specimens (P < 0.0001). Variations in specimen quality and the sensitivity of the diagnostic assay used have a significant impact on determining the prevalence of C. trachomatis in a population.

Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in genitourinary specimens from men and women by a coamplification PCR assay.

A coamplification PCR test for the direct detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in urethral and endocervical swabs and urine samples from men and women was compared to standard culture techniques. Processed specimens were amplified in single reaction tubes containing primers for both organisms, and PCR products were detected by a colorimetric microwell plate hybridization assay specific for each pathogen. Of 344 specimens from men, 45 (13.1%) urine specimens were PCR positive for C. trachomatis, 51 (14.8%) urethral swab specimens were PCR positive, and 29 urethral swab specimens (8.4%) were culture positive. After analysis of discrepancies, the resolved sensitivity and specificity of PCR for C. trachomatis were 96.2 and 99.3%, respectively, in urethral swab specimens, compared to 88.2 and 98.6% for urine specimens. Of the 192 specimens from women, 28 (14.6%) urine specimens were PCR positive for C. trachomatis, 32 (16.7%) endocervical specimens were PCR positive, and 19 (9.9%) endocervical specimens were culture positive. After analysis of discrepancies, the resolved sensitivity and specificity of PCR for C. trachomatis for endocervical specimens were both 100% compared to 100 and 99.4%, respectively, for urine specimens from women. In men, 68 (19.8%) urine specimens were PCR positive for N. gonorrhoeae, 73 (21.2%) urethral swabs were PCR positive, and 59 (17.2%) urethral swabs were culture positive. After analysis of discrepancies, the resolved sensitivity and specificity of PCR for N. gonorrhoeae were 97.3 and 97.0%, respectively, for urethral specimens compared to 94.4 and 98.5% for urine specimens. In women, 18 (9.4%) urine specimens were PCR positive for N. gonorrhoeae, 23 (12.0%) were endocervical swab PCR positive, and 15 (7.8%) endocervical specimens were culture positive. After analysis of discrepancies, the resolved sensitivity and specificity of PCR for N. gonorrhoeae were 100 and 99.4%, respectively, for endocervical specimens compared to 90.0 and 95.9% for female urine specimens. These results indicate that a multiplex PCR is highly sensitive for detecting both C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae from a single urine or genital swab, providing a more cost-effective way of screening multiple pathogens.

Urine as a diagnostic specimen for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Malaysia by ligase chain reaction.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Noninvasive urine screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infections offers a valuable public health tool, which could be of vast importance in chlamydial control programs. The authors evaluated a new DNA amplification method, ligase chain reaction (LCR). GOALS: The goal was to ascertain whether urine testing could be used as screening method to detect C. trachomatis infections in commercial sex workers, patients at sexually transmitted diseases clinic, and asymptomatic patients in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. METHODS: First-void urine specimens from 300 men and 300 women were tested by LCR, as well as by a commercially available enzyme immunoassay. The LCR assay amplifies specific sequences within the chlamydial plasmid with ligand-labeled probes, and the resultant amplicons are detected by an automated immunoassay. Specimens with discrepant results were confirmed by another LCR of the specimen that targeted the gene for the major outer membrane protein (OMP1). RESULTS: There were 31 LCR-positive male urine and 37 LCR-positive female urine specimens. The resolved sensitivity and specificity for the LCR of the male urine specimens were 100% and 99.6%, respectively, whereas for female urine specimens, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 98.5%, respectively. After resolution of discrepant test results by OMP1 LCR, the prevalence was 10% for men and 11% for women. The urine enzyme immunoassay was not useful in diagnosing C. trachomatis infections in either men or women, as the resolved sensitivities were 10% and 15.2%, respectively. The specificities were 99.6% for men and 98.9% for women. CONCLUSIONS: Testing first-void urine specimens by LCR is a highly sensitive and specific method to diagnose C. trachomatis infections in men and women, providing health care workers and public health officials with a new molecular amplification assay that uses noninvasive urine specimens for population-based screening purposes.

Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine of asymptomatic men.

In a study of 1,486 men attending two sexually transmitted disease clinics, of whom 891 had no symptoms of urethritis, we compared an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Baxter-Bartels, formerly Northumbria AntigEnz) of urine sediment to urethral culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. C. trachomatis prevalence by culture alone was 7.7% in asymptomatic men and 10.9% in symptomatic men. Discrepant results between EIA of urine and urethral culture were evaluated by direct fluorescent-antibody staining (DFA) for elementary bodies in urine sediment or in culture transport media. When chlamydial infection was defined as either a positive urethral culture or positive EIA confirmed by DFA, chlamydia prevalence increased to 8.9% in asymptomatic men and 11.6% in symptomatic men. The urine EIA sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for chlamydia detection in asymptomatic men were 84.8, 99.3, 91.8, and 98.5%, respectively, with nearly identical results for symptomatic men. The sensitivities of urethral culture alone compared with the combination of urethral culture and urine EIA (with DFA confirmation) were 87.3 and 94.3% for asymptomatic and symptomatic men, respectively. The present EIA of urine sediment is both highly sensitive and specific for the detection of C. trachomatis in asymptomatic men, thus providing a noninvasive screening method for chlamydia infection in asymptomatic men attending sexually transmitted disease clinics.

Direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men by using a rapid polymerase chain reaction assay.

Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in men has traditionally been limited to men who present with urethral symptoms, thereby limiting the detection of asymptomatic chlamydia infection in men. In order to effectively screen both symptomatic and asymptomatic men, we evaluated a newly developed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, Amplicor C. trachomatis, from Roche Molecular Systems for the detection of C. trachomatis in urine specimens in comparison with urethral culture. A total of 530 male urine specimens were collected from 322 symptomatic and 208 asymptomatic men attending two sexually transmitted disease clinics in Baltimore, Md. The prevalence of C. trachomatis by culture was 9.8% (10.6% in symptomatic men and 8.2% in asymptomatic men). Compared with culture, the sensitivity of the PCR was 92.8%, the specificity was 94.7%, the positive predictive value was 68.4%, and the negative predictive value was 99.1%. Discrepant results between culture and PCR were further analyzed by direct fluorescent-antibody staining of elementary bodies in urine sediment and in culture transport vials and by major outer membrane protein PCR of transport media for specimens with negative culture. The revised sensitivity and specificity of PCR for urine were 95.0 and 99.8%, respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values were 98.7 and 99.1%, respectively. The sensitivity of culture compared with PCR and/or direct fluorescent-antibody staining was 68.4%. These results indicate that the PCR assay is a highly sensitive and specific assay for the detection of C. trachomatis in male urine specimens and provides a noninvasive technique for routine screening of chlamydia infection in both symptomatic and asymptomatic men.

In vitro evaluation of activities of azithromycin, erythromycin, and tetracycline against Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia pneumoniae.

The in vitro activities of azithromycin (CP-62,993; Pfizer), erythromycin, and tetracycline were evaluated by inhibiting Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia pneumoniae, formerly TWAR, propagation in vitro in McCoy cells, HeLa cells, and HL cells. Eleven clinical isolates of C. trachomatis (serovars D, E, F, J, K, and L2) and four strains of C. pneumoniae were tested with an inoculum of 10(3) inclusion-forming units in a 96-well microtiter plate. The MIC ranges of these antimicrobial agents against C. trachomatis were as follows: azithromycin, 0.125 to 0.5 microgram/ml; erythromycin, 0.25 to 0.1 microgram/ml; and tetracycline, 0.0625 to 1.0 microgram/ml. The MBC ranges, calculated from passage into antibiotic-free medium, were as follows: azithromycin, 0.125 to 4.0 micrograms/ml; erythromycin, 0.5 to 8.0 micrograms/ml; and tetracycline, 0.0625 to 4.0 micrograms/ml. The MIC ranges for C. pneumoniae in both HeLa and HL cells were as follows: azithromycin, 0.125 to 1.0 micrograms/ml; erythromycin, 0.0625 to 1.0 microgram/ml; and tetracycline, 0.125 to 1.0 microgram/ml. The MBC ranges were as follows: azithromycin, 0.25 to 1.0 microgram/ml; erythromycin, 0.25 to 1.0 microgram/ml; and tetracycline, 0.125 to 4.0 micrograms/ml. From the results of this in vitro study, azithromycin appears to be an effective antibiotic comparable to tetracycline and erythromycin for use in the treatment of both C. trachomatis and C. pneumoniae infections.

Evaluation of Syva enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens.

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection was evaluated by culture and a new Syva enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in 1,012 patients at two Baltimore, Md., sexually transmitted disease clinics. The overall chlamydia prevalence determined by culture was 12%. For 506 fresh cervical and urethral specimens, the sensitivity of Syva EIA was 90% and its specificity was 94% compared with culture. Discordant Syva EIA results were further evaluated by staining the sediment in centrifuged culture transport media and Syva EIA transport tubes with a fluorescent monoclonal antibody to C. trachomatis to detect elementary bodies. Reanalysis of the data after use of this technique to resolve discordant results increased sensitivity and specificity to 92 and 96%, respectively. A subsample of 307 fresh cervical specimens was also tested in a three-way comparison using Abbott Chlamydiazyme, Syva EIA, and culture. In this sample, compared with culture, the sensitivity and specificity of Syva EIA were 87 and 95%, respectively, and for Chlamydiazyme they were 77 and 98%, respectively. Syva EIA is a 4-h, easy-to-perform enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay which has a high sensitivity with fresh genital specimens and offers an excellent alternative to culture.