Pediatric acute myeloid leukemia patients with i(17)(q10) mimicking acute promyelocytic leukemia: Two case reports.

BACKGROUND: Chromosome i(17)(q10) abnormality is mainly associated with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative tumors (MDS/MPD), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The role of i(17)(q10) in AML is still unknown, the differences between AML and acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL)-like AML with i(17)(q10) need more research. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and laboratory evidence of 2 AML cases with i(17)(q10), similar to APL phenotype. CASE SUMMARY: Both pediatric patients were males; case 1 had newly diagnosed AML, and case 2 showed relapsed tumor after 1 year of drug withdrawal. Bone marrow cell morphology, chromosome karyotype analysis, Fully-instrumented submersible housing test, immunological assays, molecular biological methods, and blood tumor panoramic gene test were performed. All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) combined with arsenic acid (As2O3) were used in the first course of treatment. Bone marrow was dominated by abnormal promyelocytic granulocytes. Karyotype test revealed i(17)(q10) isochromosome. Immunological phenotype mainly included positive expressions of CD9, CD13, CD33, and CD38. Case 1 suffered intracranial hemorrhage after re-chemotherapy and died on D162. For case 2, on D145 and D265, bone marrow promyelocytic granulocytes accounted for 2%. Flow cytometric residual lesion detection showed no abnormal immunophenotype cells. The copy number of WT1 gene in two cases were 1087 and 1010, respectively, and the expression rates were 55.29% and 59.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: ATRA, As2O3, and chemotherapy may be ineffective in treating APL-like AML with i(17)(q10) but without t(15;17) and PML-RARA fusion gene.

Study on clinical characteristics and follow-up visit of acquired aplastic anemia associated with parvovirus B19 infection.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate clinical characteristics of parvovirus (B19) related aplastic anemia (AA). METHODS: Of the 28 children with AA included in this study, 24 were treated routinely and received planned follow-up; 15 were subject to B19-DNA re-examination during the treatment and 8 underwent examination for B19-IgM and B19-IgG. Another 39 initially identified AA children were enrolled as the controls and received the treatment same as the above-mentioned group. RESULTS: There were more patients aged 5-8 y in the B19 infection group than the control group (P < 0.05). The course of AA in the B19 infection group was less than 2 mo and the serious aplastic anemia (SAA) and very serious aplastic anemia (VSAA) were more frequently observed in this group than the controls (P < 0.05). The overall efficacy of the treatments in the B19 infection group was more dismal than that in the controls (P < 0.05). Among 15 patients who were subjected to B19-DNA re-examination, negative findings were found in 6 patients with chronic aplastic anemia (CAA); the B19-DNA was persistently positive in 2 of the SAA and 5 VSAA patients. IgM and IgG were respectively detected in 3 and 2 patients out of the 8 children who received antibody examination. CONCLUSIONS: Parvovirus B19 infection contributes to the generation of AA, particularly in children aged 5-8 y. The AA induced may be mainly classified as serious and very serious type, with a course of disease less than 2 mo. Patients can be saved if B19-DNA is eliminated and the antibody is produced.

Hemogram and bone marrow morphology in children with chronic aplastic anemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Aplastic anemia (AA) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) are both acquired disorders in which bone marrow fails to produce or release sufficient blood cells. Anemia, infections and thrombocytopenia are common signs of such diseases. Clinically, it is difficult to distinguish chronic aplastic anemia (CAA) from MDS, especially from MDS without splenomegaly. As prognosis and treatment of AA and MDS are different, it is extremely important to make a differential diagnosis for the two diseases. METHODS: The medical records of 31 patients with CAA and 17 patients with MDS were retrospectively reviewed. Hemogram, bone marrow smear and biopsy for those patients were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean counts of monocytes and platelets in the peripheral blood of the CAA patients were significantly lower than those of the MDS patients. Bone marrow smear showed a reduction of cellularity in CAA patients. The mean counts of myeloblasts+promyelocytes, myeloblasts+proerythroblasts, and megakaryocytes in the bone marrow of CAA patients were markedly lower than those in MDS patients. But the mean lymphocyte count was reversed. Bone marrow cells showed morphological abnormalities in MDS. Hematopoietic tissue in the bone marrow biopsy decreased obviously in more than 96% of the patients with CAA. Adipose tissue in the bone marrow of CAA patients increased obviously. A reduction or deficiency (<2 cell/piece) of megakaryocytes was noted in 28 patients with CAA. Fibrous tissue in the bone marrow was detected in 5 patients with CAA. Bone marrow biopsy results showed hypercellular changes in 12 MDS patients. Ten patients showed aggregated erythroblasts which were in the same stage of development, and 15 patients had abnormal localization of immature precursors (ALIP). CONCLUSIONS: Blood cell counts can be decreased in addition to the reduction of cellularity in the bone marrow without dyshematopoiesis in CAA patients. Peripheral blood monocytes, fibrous tissue and cellularity in bone marrow are increased in MDS. Dyshematopoiesis and ALIP may appear characteristically in the children with MDS. Histology of bone marrow is important in the differential diagnosis of MDS and CAA.