Expression and clinical significance of hypoxia-induced long non-coding RNA TCONS_I2_00001955 in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been found to play important roles in occurrence, development, and metastasis of various tumors. We aimed to screen long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) that promote invasion and metastasis of breast cancer cells under hypoxia, and investigate the relationship between lncRNA expression and clinicopathological features and prognosis in invasive breast cancer. METHODS: LncRNA microarray was used to screen the differentially expressed lncRNAs in MCF7, MDA-MB-231, and SKBR3 breast cancer cell lines cultured under normoxia and hypoxia, respectively. Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to verify the microarray results. CCK8 and Transwell experiments were performed to identify the lncRNA that promote proliferation, migration, and invasion of breast cancer cells. Expression of the lncRNA and HIF-1α in invasive breast cancer was detected by RNAscope and immunohistochemistry, respectively. Correlation between the lncRNA expression and baseline characteristics was analyzed. Prognostic value of the lncRNA was evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS: Expression of lncRNA TCONS_I2_00001955 in all the three breast cancer cells was increased under hypoxia. Overexpression of TCONS_I2_00001955 significantly enhanced proliferation, migration, and invasion of SKBR3 cells. Positive expression of TCONS_I2_00001955 was associated with recurrence, metastasis, and high expression of HIF-1α (P < 0.05), and it was an independent risk factor for poor disease-free survival of breast cancer. CONCLUSION: Hypoxia-induced lncRNA TCONS_I2_00001955 was associated with aggressive feature and poor prognosis of breast cancer.

AGR2 and FOXA1 as prognostic markers in ER-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic role of either forkhead box A1 (FOXA1) or anterior gradient 2 (AGR2) in breast cancer has been found separately. Considering that there were interplays between them depending on ER status, we aimed to assess the statistical interaction between AGR2 and FOXA1 on breast cancer prognosis and examine the prognostic role of the combination of them by ER status. METHODS: AGR2 and FOXA1 expression in tumor tissues were evaluated with tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry in 915 breast cancer patients with follow up data. The expression levels of these two markers were treated as binary variables, and many different cutoff values were tried for each marker. Survival and Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between AGR2, FOXA1 and prognosis, and the statistical interaction between them on the prognosis was assessed on multiplicative scale. RESULTS: Statistical interaction between AGR2 and FOXA1 on the PFS was significant with all the cutoff points in ER-positive breast cancer patients but not ER-negative ones. Among ER-positive patients, the poor prognostic role of the high level of FOXA1 was significant only in patients with the low level of AGR2, and vice versa. When AGR2 and FOXA1 were considered together, patients with low levels of both markers had significantly longer PFS compared with all other groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was a statistical interaction between AGR2 and FOXA1 on the prognosis of ER-positive breast cancer. The combination of AGR2 and FOXA1 was a more useful marker for the prognosis of ER-positive breast cancer patients.

Combined low levels of H4K16ac and H4K20me3 predicts poor prognosis in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Results of previous studies about the prognostic roles of histone H4 lysine 16 acetylation (H4K16ac) and histone H4 lysine 20 trimethylation (H4K20me3) in breast cancer were inconsistent. Cellular experiments revealed the interplays between H4K16ac and H4K20me3, but no population study explored the interaction between them on the prognosis. METHODS: H4K16ac and H4K20me3 levels in tumors were evaluated by immunohistochemistry for 958 breast cancer patients. Hazard ratios for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using Cox regression models. Interaction was assessed on multiplicative scale. Concordance index (C-index) was calculated to verify the predictive performance. RESULTS: The prognostic roles of the low level of H4K16ac or H4K20me3 were significant only in patients with the low level of another marker and their interactions were significant. Moreover, compared with joint high levels of both them, only the combined low levels of both them was associated with a poor prognosis but not the low level of single one. The C-index of the clinicopathological model combined the joint expression of H4K16ac and H4K20me3 [0.739 for OS; 0.672 for PFS] was significantly larger than that of the single clinicopathological model [0.699 for OS, P < 0.001; 0.642 for PFS, P = 0.003] or the model combined with the single H4K16ac [0.712 for OS, P < 0.001; 0.646 for PFS, P < 0.001] or H4K20me3 [0.724 for OS, P = 0.031; 0.662 for PFS, P = 0.006]. CONCLUSIONS: There was an interaction between H4K16ac and H4K20me3 on the prognosis of breast cancer and the combination of them was a superior prognostic marker compared to the single one.

The Prognostic Value of Microvascular Density in Early Postoperative Recurrence and Metastasis of T1 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the relation of microvascular density (MVD) to the early postoperative recurrence and metastasis of T1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and to determine whether MVD could be a prognostic predictor of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with T1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled. Immunohistochemistry with primary antibody against CD-34 was performed to count MVD. ROC curve was plotted and appropriate cutoff value was determined to evaluate the potential power of MVD in predicting early recurrence and metastasis of T1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Survival curves were drawn by the Kaplan-Meier method and significance were tested by the Mantel-Cox test. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients with T1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled. The MVD of T1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with early metastasis was significantly higher than that of T1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients without early metastasis (65.83±4.39 vs. 42.26±2.34, p<0.001). MVD was available in distinguishing whether patients with early esophageal are prone to postoperative recurrence or metastasis (AUC=0.861; 95% CI 0.738-0.984, p<0.001), with 88.89% sensitivity and 68.42% specificity of MVD being obtained when the cut-off is 44.5. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that patients with a higher MVD had a lower survival (37.35 months) compared with those with low MVD (40.79 months) (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MVD could be a promising indicator for early postoperative recurrence and metastasis of T1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and the prognosis of these patients.

Association of H3K9me3 with breast cancer prognosis by estrogen receptor status.

BACKGROUND: Cellular experiments revealed that a decreased histone H3 lysine 9 trimethylation (H3K9me3) level was associated with the upregulation of oncogenes in breast cancer cells. Moreover, the role of H3K9me3 in breast cancer was closely associated with estrogen receptor (ER) status. Therefore, we aimed to examine the prognostic value of H3K9me3 on breast cancer by ER status. The level of H3K9me3 in tumors were evaluated with tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry for 917 women diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using Cox regression models. Interaction between H3K9me3 and ER on the prognosis was assessed on multiplicative scale. RESULTS: The level of H3K9me3 in tumor tissues was lower than that in adjacent tissues. The high level of H3K9me3 was associated with a better OS (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.21-0.86) and PFS (HR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.29-0.81) among only ER-positive but not ER-negative tumors. Moreover, the interaction between the level of H3K9me3 and ER status (negative and positive) on the prognosis was significant (Pinteraction = 0.011 for OS; Pinteraction = 0.022 for PFS). Furthermore, the ER-positive tumors were stratified by ER-low and ER-high positive tumors, and the prognostic role of H3K9me3 was significant among only ER-high positive patients (HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13-0.85 for OS; HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.26-0.86 for PFS). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the prognostic value of H3K9me3 on breast cancer was related to ER status and expression level, and the high level of H3K9me3 was associated with a better prognosis among ER-positive tumors, particularly ER-high positive tumors.

Prognostic value of glutaminase 1 in breast cancer depends on H3K27me3 expression and menopausal status.

Glutaminase 1 (GLS) is a therapeutic target for breast cancer; although GLS inhibitors have been developed, only a few subjects responded well to the therapy. Considering that the expression of histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) and menopausal status was closely linked to GLS, we examined the effects of H3K27me3 and menopausal status on GLS to breast cancer prognosis. Data for 962 women diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer were analyzed. H3K27me3 and GLS expression in tumors were evaluated with tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated using Cox regression models. Statistical interaction was assessed on multiplicative scale. There was a beneficial prognostic effect of GLS expression on overall survival for those with low H3K27me3 level (HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.20-1.28) but an adverse prognostic effect for those with high H3K27me3 level (HR = 3.90, 95% CI: 1.29-11.78) among premenopausal women, and the statistical interaction was significant (Pinteraction = 0.003). Similar pattern was further observed for progression-free survival (HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.20-0.95 for low H3K27me3 level, HR = 1.35, 95% CI: 0.74-2.48 for high H3K27me3 level, Pinteraction = 0.024). The statistical interaction did not occur among postmenopausal women. Our study showed that the prognostic effects of GLS on breast cancer correlated to the expression level of H3K27me3 and menopausal status, which would help optimize the medication strategies of GLS inhibitors.

Time-varying effects of FOXA1 on breast cancer prognosis.

PURPOSE: Results of previous studies on the associations between Forkhead box A1 (FOXA1) expression in breast cancer tissues and the prognosis varied depending on the follow-up durations. The present study would investigate whether there is a time-varying effect of FOXA1 in breast cancer tissues on the prognosis. METHODS: FOXA1 expressions were evaluated in 1041 primary invasive breast tumors with tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry. Cox models with restricted cubic splines and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to examine the associations between FOXA1 and the prognosis. Flexible parametric models were applied to explore the time-varying effect of FOXA1. RESULTS: Overall, the association between FOXA1 expression and the prognosis was not significant but varied on the time of follow-up. Compared to FOXA1 ≤ 270 of H-score, the hazard ratios (HRs) of death for those with 271-285 of FOXA1 expression increased from 0.35 (95% CI 0.14-0.86) at 6 months after diagnosis to 2.88 (95% CI 1.35-6.15) at 120 months with a crossover at around 36 months. Similar patterns were also observed for FOXA1 > 285 of H-score and for progression free survival (PFS). Moreover, when allowed both FOXA1 and estrogen receptor (ER) to change over time in the model (considering that ER had a similar time-varying effect), these time-varying effects remained for FOXA1 on both overall survival (OS) (P < 0.01) and PFS (P = 0.01) but were attenuated for ER (P = 0.13 for OS). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed an independent time-varying effect of FOXA1 on breast cancer prognosis, which would provide an insight into the roles of FOXA1 as a marker of breast cancer prognosis and may help optimize the medication strategies.

Collapsin response mediator protein 4 promotor methylation level as a potential predictor for diagnosing primary malignant lymphoma of the prostate.

BACKGROUND: Primary malignant lymphoma of the prostate (PMLP) is prone to occur in the elderly, and it has no significant correlation with lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and prostate specific antigen (PSA). Clinical symptoms and imaging data of PMLP remain unspecific, and its prognosis is poor. A previous result showed that collapsin response mediator protein 4 (CRMP4) promotor methylation can be used as a predictor for lymph node metastases in prostate biopsies. However, the relationship between CRMP4 promotor methylation and PMLP has not been studied. METHODS: We investigated the clinicopathological features of PMLP and the significance of CRMP4 methylation in PMLP. The clinical data and diagnosis information of 10 patients with PMLP were retrospectively analyzed. The CRMP4 promotor methylation level in paraffin-embedded tissues of the 10 patients with PMLP were determined and then compared to limited prostate cancer (LPCa) and its negative lymph node tissue [LPCa-LN (-) (10 cases)] and also to metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma (mPCa) and its positive lymph node tissue [mPCa-LN (+) (10 cases)]. Methylation of the CRMP4 promotor in each group was analyzed statistically. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the diagnostic value of CRMP4 methylation in PMLP. RESULTS: The average methylation value of CRMP4 in 10 PMLP patients, 20 cases of prostate adenocarcinoma tissue, 10 cases LPCa-LN (-) and 10 cases mPCa-LN (+) were 42.3, 30.6, 6.7 and 20.3%, respectively. A Kruskal-Wallis test showed that the difference of CRMP4 methylation was significant (X2 = 38.0, P < 0.001). An ROC curve analysis found that CRMP4 methylation > 40.9% could diagnose PMLP. This method had 90% sensitivity and 95% specificity under conditions of CRMP4 methylation > 40.9%. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.957. CONCLUSIONS: Methylation of the CRMP4 gene was significantly increased in PMLP, and it is expected to become a new predictor for PMLP.

Prognostic significance of overexpression of EZH2 and H3k27me3 proteins in gastric cancer.

The enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) methyl transferase and histone 3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3) protein can repress gene transcription, and their aberrant expression has been observed in various human cancers. This study determined their expression levels in gastric cancer tissues with reference to clinicopathological features and patient survival. We collected 117 gastric cancer and corresponding normal tissues for immunohistochemistry analysis. In gastric cancers, 82/117 (70.1%) were positive for EZH2 and 66/117 (56.4%) for H3K27me3 proteins in contrast to only 5.41% and 7.25% of normal gastric mucosa specimens, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival data showed the average overall and disease-free survival of EZH2 high expression patients was 25.2 and 20.2 months, respectively, shorter than that with EZH2 low expression (40.5 and 35.9 months). The average overall survival and disease-free survival of high H3K27me3 expression patients was 23.4 and 17.4 months, shorter than without H3K27me3 expression (37.6 and 34.5 months). The average overall survival and disease-free survival of patients with both EZH2 and H3K27me3 expression was 18.8 and 12.9 months, respectively, shorter than that with either alone (34.7 and 31.2 months) or with low levels of both (43.9 and 39.9 months). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that H3K27me3 and EZH2 expression, tumor size differentiation and clinical stage were all independent prognostic factors for predicting patient survival. This study demonstrated that detection of both EZH2 and H3K27me3 proteins can predict poor survival of gastric cancer patients, superior to single protein detection. In addition, H3K27me3 and EZH2 protein expression could predict lymph node metastasis.