ABSTRACT
The incidence of esophageal diseases such as esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have been increasing over the last 40 years. The esophageal microbiome appears to have a role in the development of some disease processes, and could also serve as markers of early diseases of the esophagus. A literature review was performed examining the role of the microbiome in the development of esophageal disease. In addition, the results of several studies and experiments were included in the review. Both EAC and GERD have increased in incidence over the last 40 years. Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a risk factor for EAC. Patients with BE appear to have a microbiome expression pattern distinct from patients without BE. The distinct pattern may be related to factors within the distal esophagus such as a more acidic environment, intraluminal stasis and other elements. It remains unclear whether the change in microflora leads to esophageal disease, or whether the disease process within the esophagus allows these particular organisms to experience overgrowth compared to other microflora. Patient factors such as body mass index (BMI), diet and geographic location also appear to affect the esophageal microbiome. There is an association with the esophageal microbiome and several esophageal diseases. Future studies should examine these correlations more closely. The distinct patterns may be able to serve as a marker of early disease, and possibly lead to a mechanism for the development of esophageal disease.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Patients diagnosed with lung cancer may require immediate evaluation of mediastinal lymph nodes to determine treatment plan. Typically, frozen section (FS) analysis has been used, but this analysis can be time-consuming and uses more tissue than touch preparation (TP) cytologic analysis. TP accuracy has been studied in other organs, but no prospective studies comparing TP to FS have been performed on mediastinal lymph nodes in lung cancer. Our goal was to compare the accuracy of TP to FS in these cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After obtaining institutional review board approval, all patients undergoing mediastinal lymph node evaluation for a diagnosis of lung cancer were asked to participate. If consent was given, TP and FS analyses were performed on all mediastinal lymph node stations in all patients and compared to permanent hematoxylin and eosin analysis. Data were collected prospectively. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled. Mean age was 67.7 years. Fifty-five percent (11 of 20) of patients were men. The mean number of lymph node stations sampled in each patient was 3.4. In predicting the stage of the patient, TP had a sensitivity and specificity of 95% and 100%, respectively. FS had a lower sensitivity, 85%, and a specificity of 100%. On permanent analysis, metastatic foci ranged in size from 0.15 mm to 1.5 mm. CONCLUSIONS: TP was more sensitive than FS in detecting mediastinal lymph node metastases. The technical difficulty of obtaining full-thickness sections without creating significant artifact may contribute to the lower sensitivity of FS in detecting micrometastases.
