Changes in the MR relaxation rate R(2)* induced by respiratory challenges at 3.0 T: a comparison of two quantification methods.

The consistent determination of changes in the transverse relaxation rate R(2)* (ΔR(2)*) is essential for the mapping of the effect of hyperoxic and hypercapnic respiratory challenges, which enables the noninvasive assessment of blood oxygenation changes and vasoreactivity by MRI. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of two different methods of ΔR(2)* quantification from dynamic multigradient-echo data: (A) subtraction of R(2)* values calculated from monoexponential decay functions; and (B) computation of ΔR(2)* echo-wise from signal intensity ratios. A group of healthy volunteers (n = 12) was investigated at 3.0 T, and the brain tissue response to carbogen and CO(2)-air inhalation was registered using a dynamic multigradient-echo sequence with high temporal and spatial resolution. Results of the ΔR(2)* quantification obtained by the two methods were compared with respect to the quality of the voxel-wise ΔR(2)* response, the number of responding voxels and the behaviour of the 'global' response of all voxels with significant R(2)* changes. For the two ΔR(2)* quantification methods, we found no differences in the temporal variation of the voxel-wise ΔR(2)* responses or in the detection sensitivity. The maximum change in the 'global' response was slightly smaller when ΔR(2)* was derived from signal intensity ratios. In conclusion, this first methodological comparison shows that both ΔR(2)* quantifications, from monoexponential approximation as well as from signal intensity ratios, are applicable for the monitoring of R(2)* changes during respiratory challenges.

Intracranial tumor response to respiratory challenges at 3.0 T: impact of different methods to quantify changes in the MR relaxation rate R2*.

PURPOSE: To compare two DeltaR2* quantification methods for analyzing the response of intracranial tumors to different breathing gases. The determination of changes in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) relaxation rate R2* (DeltaR2*), induced by hyperoxic and hypercapnic respiratory challenges, enables the noninvasive assessment of blood oxygenation changes and vasoreactivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with various intracranial tumors were examined at 3.0 T. The response to respiratory challenges was registered using a dynamic multigradient-echo sequence with high temporal and spatial resolution. At each dynamic step, DeltaR2* was derived in two different ways: 1) by subtraction of R2* values obtained from monoexponential decay functions, 2) by computing DeltaR2* echo-wise from signal intensity ratios. The sensitivity for detection of responding voxels and the behavior of the "global" response were investigated. RESULTS: Significantly more responding voxels (about 4%) were found for method (1). The "global" response was independent from the chosen quantification method but showed slightly larger changes (about 6%) when DeltaR2* was derived from method (1). CONCLUSION: Similar results were observed for the two methods, with a slightly higher detection sensitivity of responding voxels when DeltaR2* was obtained from monoexponential approximation.

Quantification of the magnetic resonance signal response to dynamic (C)O(2)-enhanced imaging in the brain at 3 T: R*(2) BOLD vs. balanced SSFP.

PURPOSE: To compare two magnetic resonance (MR) contrast mechanisms, R*(2) BOLD and balanced SSFP, for the dynamic monitoring of the cerebral response to (C)O(2) respiratory challenges. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Carbogen and CO(2)-enriched air were delivered to 9 healthy volunteers and 1 glioblastoma patient. The cerebral response was recorded by two-dimensional (2D) dynamic multi-gradient-echo and passband-balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) sequences, and local changes of R*(2) and signal intensity were investigated. Detection sensitivity was analyzed by statistical tests. An exponential signal model was fitted to the global response function delivered by each sequence, enabling quantitative comparison of the amplitude and temporal behavior. RESULTS: The bSSFP signal changes during carbogen and CO(2)/air inhalation were lower compared with R*(2) BOLD (ca. 5% as opposed to 8-13%). The blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) response amplitude enabled differentiation between carbogen and CO(2)/air by a factor of 1.4-1.6, in contrast to bSSFP, where differentiation was not possible. Furthermore, motion robustness and detection sensitivity were higher for R*(2) BOLD. CONCLUSION: Both contrast mechanisms are well suited to dynamic (C)O(2)-enhanced MR imaging, although the R*(2) BOLD mechanism was demonstrated to be superior in several respects for the chosen application. This study suggests that the R*(2) BOLD and bSSFP-response characteristics are related to different physiologic mechanisms.

Spectral entropy and bispectral index as measures of the electroencephalographic effects of propofol.

Recently, Datex-Ohmeda introduced the Entropy Moduletrade mark for measuring depth of anesthesia. Based on the Shannon entropy of the electroencephalogram, state entropy (SE) and response entropy (RE) are computed. We investigated the dose-response relationship of SE and RE during propofol anesthesia in comparison with the Bispectral Indextrade mark (BIS). Twenty patients were studied without surgical stimulus. Anesthesia was induced by a constant propofol infusion of 2000 mg/h (451 +/- 77 microg x min(-1) x kg(-1)) via a large forearm vein. Propofol was infused until substantial burst suppression occurred (more than 50%) or mean arterial blood pressure decreased to <60 mm Hg. Hereafter, infusions were stopped until recovery of BIS values up to 60 was reached. Subsequently, the constant propofol infusion of 2000 mg/h was restarted to increase depth of anesthesia and again decreased (infusion was stopped) within the BIS value range of 40-60. The coefficient of determination (R2) and the prediction probability (P(K)) were calculated to evaluate the performance of SE, RE, and BIS to predict changing propofol effect-site concentrations. R2 values for SE, RE, and BIS of 0.88 +/- 0.08, 0.89 +/- 0.07, and 0.92 +/- 0.06, respectively, were similar. The calculated P(K) values, however, revealed a significant difference between SE and RE compared with BIS, with P(K) = 0.77 +/- 0.09, 0.76 +/- 0.10, and 0.84 +/- 0.06, respectively. BIS seems to show slight advantages in predicting propofol effect-site concentrations compared with SE and RE, as measured by P(K) but not as measured by R2.

Spectral entropy and bispectral index as measures of the electroencephalographic effects of sevoflurane.

BACKGROUND: Recently, entropy algorithms have been proposed as electroencephalographic measures of anesthetic drug effects. Datex-Ohmeda (Helsinki, Finland) introduced the Entropy Module, a new electroencephalographic monitor designed for measuring depth of anesthesia. The monitor calculates a state entropy (SE) computed over the frequency range of 0.8-32 Hz and a response entropy (RE) computed over the frequency range of 0.8-47 Hz. The authors investigated the dose-response relation of SE and RE during sevoflurane anesthesia in comparison with the Bispectral Index (BIS). METHODS: Sixteen patients were studied without surgical stimulus. Anesthesia was induced by sevoflurane inhalation with a tight-fitting facemask. Sevoflurane concentrations were increased and subsequently decreased and increased two to four times until the measurement was stopped and patients were intubated for surgery. The performances of SE, RE, and BIS to predict the estimated sevoflurane effect site concentration, obtained by simultaneous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling, were compared by calculating the correlation coefficients and the prediction probability. RESULTS: State entropy, RE, and BIS values decreased continuously over the observed concentration range of sevoflurane. Correlation coefficients were slightly but not significantly better for entropy parameters (0.87 +/- 0.09 and 0.86 +/- 0.10 for SE and RE, respectively) than for BIS (0.85 +/- 0.12). Calculating the prediction probability confirmed these results with a prediction probability of 0.84 +/- 0.05 and 0.82 +/- 0.06 for SE and RE, respectively, and 0.80 +/- 0.06 for BIS. CONCLUSION: State entropy and RE seem to be useful electroencephalographic measures of sevoflurane drug effect.

The correlation of the bispectral index with propofol effect site concentrations is not altered by epochs indicated as artefact-loaded by narcotrend.

OBJECTIVE: Artefact detection is an essential feature of automatic EEG monitoring systems used in anaesthesia. Clinical experience indicates that Narcotrend monitoring (MonitorTechnik, Bad Bramstedt, Germany, version 4.0) excludes more EEG epochs because of artefacts than bispectral index monitoring (BIS, Aspect Medical Systems, Newton, MA, version XP). Whether this increased exclusion of epochs is justified has not been investigated yet. METHODS: Eighteen adult patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were investigated. Induction of anaesthesia was performed with a fentanyl bolus and a propofol infusion. Additionally, following intubation patients received 15 ml bupivacaine 0.5% epidurally. After a waiting period of 45 min depth of anaesthesia was varied two times by increasing and decreasing propofol concentrations. Narcotrend index, BIS values and calculated propofol effect site concentrations were automatically recorded at intervals of 5 s. We tested the hypothesis whether exclusion of artefacts detected by the Narcotrend monitor would possibly improve the prediction probability of the BIS monitor, justifying the necessity of artefact suppression. RESULTS: Simulated propofol effect site concentrations ranged from 2 microg/ml to 6 microg/ml. The Narcotrend monitor excluded a significantly higher percentage of epochs because of artefact detection (12.6 + 1.0%) than the BIS monitor (0.4 +/- 0.1%). The performance of BIS as an indicator of predicted propofol effect site concentrations did not differ when including (P(K) = 0.86 +/- 0.05) or excluding (P(K) = 0.85 +/- 0.04) the data pairs where Narcotrend monitor but not BIS monitor indicated an artefact. Artefacts were evenly distributed over the investigated range ofpropofol effect site concentrations. CONCLUSION: Exclusion of data pairs that were detected as artefacts by Narcotrend but not by BIS did not change the performance of bispectral index as an indicator of propofol effect site concentration.

Propofol and sevoflurane in subanesthetic concentrations act preferentially on the spinal cord: evidence from multimodal electrophysiological assessment.

BACKGROUND: Animal experiments in recent years have shown that attenuation of motor responses by general anesthetics is mediated at least partly by spinal mechanisms. Less is known about the relative potency of anesthetic drugs in suppressing cortical and spinal electrophysiological responses in vivo in humans, particularly those, but not only those, connected with motor responses. Therefore, we studied the effects of sevoflurane and propofol in humans using multimodal electrophysiological assessment. METHODS: We studied nine healthy volunteers in two sessions during steady state sedation with 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 microg/l (targeted plasma concentration) propofol or 0.2 and 0.4 vol% (end-tidal) sevoflurane. Following a 15-min equilibration period, motor responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation and peripheral (H-reflex, F-wave) stimulation were recorded, while electroencephalography and auditory evoked responses were recorded in parallel. RESULTS: At concentrations corresponding to two thirds of C(50 awake), motor responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation were reduced by approximately 50%, H-reflex amplitude was reduced by 22%, F-wave amplitude was reduced by 40%, and F-wave persistence was reduced by 25%. No significant differences between sevoflurane and propofol were found. At this concentration, the Bispectral Index was reduced by 7%, and the middle-latency auditory evoked responses were attenuated only mildly (N(b) latency increased by 11%, amplitude P(a)N(b) did not change). In contrast, the postauricular reflex was suppressed by 77%. CONCLUSIONS: The large effect of both anesthetics on all spinal motor responses, compared with the small effect on electroencephalography and middle-latency auditory evoked responses, assuming that they represent cortical modulation, may suggest that the suppression of motor responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation is largely due to submesencephalic effects.