Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. / Epifysiolyse av lårbenshodet.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis is a paediatric hip disorder that affects around 30 children in Norway each year. The symptoms are a limping gait and pain in the hip or knee. The condition is diagnosed by normal x-ray and treatment is surgical. It is essential to make the diagnosis as quickly as possible, and children with persistent hip symptoms should be rapidly examined by means of a hip x-ray.

Magnetic resonance imaging at primary diagnosis cannot predict subsequent contralateral slip in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

OBJECTIVE: Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip in slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is controversial, and no reliable method has been established to predict subsequent contralateral slip. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate if magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed at primary diagnosis could predict future contralateral slip. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients with unilateral SCFE were included, all had MRI of both hips taken before operative fixation. Six different parameters were measured on the MRI: the MRI slip angle, the greatest focal widening of the physis, the global widening of the physis measured at three locations (the midpoint of the physis and 1 cm lateral and medial to the midpoint), periphyseal (epiphyseal and metaphyseal) bone marrow edema, the presence of pathological joint effusion, and the amount of joint effusion measured from the lateral edge of the greater trochanter. Mean follow-up was 33 months (range, 16-63 months). Six patients were treated for contralateral slip during the follow-up time and a comparison of the MRI parameters of the contralateral hip in these six patients and in the 16 patients that remained unilateral was done to see if subsequent contralateral slip was possible to predict at primary diagnosis. RESULTS: All MRI parameters were significantly altered in hips with established SCFE compared with the contralateral hips. However, none of the MRI parameters showed any significant difference between patients who had a subsequent contralateral slip and those that remained unilateral. CONCLUSIONS: MRI taken at primary diagnosis could not predict future contralateral slip.

Good long-term outcome of the untreated contralateral hip in unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis : Forty hips with a mean follow-up of 41 years.

PURPOSE: There is no consensus regarding prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip in slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). In order to further study this question, we evaluated the long-term natural history of untreated contralateral hips. METHODS: Forty patients treated for unilateral SCFE without evidence of subsequent contralateral slip during adolescence were reviewed with a mean follow-up of 36 years (range 21-50 years). The deformity after SCFE may demonstrate radiographic signs of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. We, therefore, measured α-angles in the contralateral hips on anteroposterior (AP) and frog-leg lateral radiographs. The angles were compared with those of a control group of adults without SCFE. Five years after the radiographic examination, with a mean follow-up of 41 years, all patients were evaluated by telephone interview. As range of motion and deformity could not be examined, a modified Harris hip score (HHS) (maximum score of 91 points) was used. A modified HHS <76 points and/or radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) was classified as a poor long-term outcome. RESULTS: The mean value of the AP α-angle was significantly higher in the contralateral hips in SCFE patients than in the control group (55° vs. 46°), while the mean value of the lateral α-angle was not. Abnormally high values for one or both α-angles were found in 16 contralateral hips (40 %), of which five patients had abnormal values for both α-angles and were considered to have had an asymptomatic contralateral slip. Five patients (13 %) had a poor outcome in the contralateral hip, of which three patients (8 %) had OA. There was a significant association between hips with both α-angles that were abnormal and poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Since the natural history showed good long-term radiographic and clinical outcome in 35 of 40 patients and only three had OA, we conclude that routine prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip is not indicated.

Percutaneous epiphysiodesis in the proximal tibia by a single-portal approach: evaluation by radiostereometric analysis.

PURPOSE: We modified the method for tibial epiphysiodesis by solely using a lateral approach to the physis. From this small-incision approach, the lateral as well as the medial part of the tibial physis were ablated. The aim of our study was to see if this operative technique might be as effective as a bilateral approach, and reduce the operation time and usage time of the image intensifier. The epiphysiodeses were monitored by radiostereometric analysis (RSA), which is a well-established method for the analysis of micro movements and has been used to monitor percutaneous epiphysiodesis with the bilateral approach. There are no reports in the literature comparing single- with double-portal approaches for percutaneous epiphysiodesis evaluated by RSA. METHODS: Twenty children were treated by percutaneous epiphysiodesis for leg length discrepancies ranging from 15 to 70 mm, comprising 14 boys and 6 girls with a mean age of 13 (11-15) years. The timing of epiphysiodesis was determined by using Moseley's straight-line graph and Paley's multiplier method. For the tibial epiphysiodesis, ten patients were operated with a single surgical approach from the lateral side (Group I) and ten patients were operated with a surgical approach from both the medial and the lateral sides (Group II). The percutaneous epiphysiodesis was monitored by RSA, a method which allows analysis of the three-dimensional dynamics of the epiphysis relative to the metaphysics. RSA examinations were performed postoperatively and after 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months. RESULTS: From 0 to 6 weeks after epiphysiodesis, the mean longitudinal growth across the operated physis in the tibia in Group I was 0.26 (0.01-0.6) mm. In Group II, the mean growth for the first 6 weeks after surgery was 0.17 (0.01-0.5) mm. During the time period from 6 weeks to 12 weeks after surgery, there was a mean growth of 0.06 (0.00-0.18) mm in Group I and 0.03 (0.00-0.2) mm in Group II. The mean growth from 0 to 6 weeks after epiphysiodesis for all patients was 0.22 mm, which corresponds to 30 % of the normal growth rate. From 6 to 12 weeks, the mean growth for all patients was 0.046 mm, i.e., 6 % of the normal growth rate. From 12 weeks to 24 weeks, no significant growth across the operated physis was observed in neither Group I nor Group II. The mean surgical time was 26 (21-30) min in Group I and 43 (35-48) min in Group II. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.006). The mean time for use of the image intensifier during surgery was 202 (191-236) s in Group I and 229 (185-289) s in Group II (p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, a single-portal technique from the lateral side for percutaneous epiphysiodesis of the proximal tibia was as effective as the double-portal technique. Actual growth arrest appeared within 12 weeks after surgery. A single-portal technique for epiphysiodesis of the tibia is a safe technique, with less surgical time and less time for image intensification compared to the double-portal technique.

Long-term outcome of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a 38-year follow-up of 66 patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of different methods of treatment in slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), to find risk factors for poor outcome, and to assess whether prophylactic fixation is indicated. METHODS: Sixty-six patients (76 hips) treated for SCFE with a mean follow-up of 38 years (range 21-57 years) were evaluated. All except seven patients had chronic SCFE. Ten patients (15%) had bilateral affection. Three methods of treatment had been used: screw fixation (35 hips), bone-peg epiphysiodesis (30 hips), and bone-peg epiphysiodesis combined with corrective femoral osteotomy (11 hips). The long-term clinical outcome was classified as good when the patient had not undergone total hip replacement (THR), when the Harris hip score (HHS) was 85 points or above, or the patient had no pain. Good radiographic outcome was defined as no THR or osteoarthritis (OA). RESULTS: In 51 patients with chronic slip (mean slip angle 32°) treated with in situ fixation, the clinical outcome was good in 35 patients (69%) and there was no significant difference between screw fixation and bone-peg epiphysiodesis. Eight patients with large chronic slip (mean slip angle 53°) were treated with bone-peg epiphysiodesis and corrective femoral osteotomy, and the clinical outcome was poor in six patients. Seven patients with acute slip had larger mean slip angle (57°) and more complications than those with chronic slip, and the long-term outcome was poor in all. Two hips out of 42 (5%) had OA in the contralateral hip at follow-up. CONCLUSION: In situ fixation of chronic SCFE gave satisfactory long-term outcome irrespective of the treatment method. Corrective femoral osteotomy did not improve the outcome in hips with large slip angles. Acute SCFE had poor outcome. Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip is barely necessary.

[Slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated with a specially designed screw]. / Behandling av epiphysiolysis capitis femoris med spesialkonstruert collumskrue.

BACKGROUND: In 1992 we developed a specially designed Olmed screw for treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. The segment of which the screw is threaded is shorter than a regular Olmed screw. In that way the threaded portion of the screw can be placed entirely within the epiphysis. This makes the shank of the screw smooth through the physis; the purpose of this is to allow continued growth in the neck of femur. The threads are reverse cutting to make the screw easier to remove. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 1992 to 2004, we treated 18 hips with slipped capital femoral epiphysis; all patients were treated percutaneously with in situ fixation. We have retrospectively reviewed the medical records and radiographs. Nine patients were reviewed clinically and radiographically after an average follow up of seven year and nine months. RESULTS: There were no difficulties with the surgical procedure, including removal of the screw. No further slippage, avascular necrosis or chondrolysis occurred. Radiographs showed that the screw allows continued growth of the neck of femur. Most of the patients had decreased internal rotation, but few had symptoms at follow up.