ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 infection on retinal microvasculature by topographically mapping the retinal arteriole-to-venule ratio (AVR). METHODS: In a comparative cross-sectional case-control study, fundus photos were obtained in COVID-19-infected patients and healthy controls. AVT was measured over 16 points across the retina using retinal vascularity index (RVI)-a novel semi-automated computerized parameter based on retinal vasculature. RESULTS: A total of 51 COVID-19-positive patients and 65 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. Overall, the mean RVI of all 16 points across the retina was 0.34 ± 0.02 in patients with COVID-19 and 0.33 ± 0.02 in control subjects (p = 0.64). Out of the 16 points being measured, three points had a statistically significant greater value in patients with COVID compared to normal controls. CONCLUSION: Localised greater RVI values were found in some of the points in COVID-19-positive patients, which likely indicates a more focal change of the vasculature.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare medical students' preference of smart phone television display (SPTD) to a slit-lamp teaching telescope (SLTT) in undergraduate clinical ophthalmology education. METHODS: This is a randomized, crossover, comparative study. Pairs of medical students were randomly assigned to 2 teaching sessions using either SPTD first followed by SLTT or in reverse order. Students were asked to give feedback on the 2 teaching devices by answering 6 questions using a numeric rating score from 1 to 10. All participating students were sent the results of the study 1 month after the completion of the study and were asked to reflect upon the outcome. RESULTS: Thirty-eight students were recruited. The overall satisfaction scores were significantly higher for SPTD than SLTT (8.6 ± 1.4 vs 7.5 ± 1.0, p < 0.01). The students preferred SPTD compared with SLTT in terms of "visualization" (8.5 ± 1.4 vs 7.0 ± 1.3, p < 0.01), "ocular sign description" (8.4 ± 1.3 vs 7.2 ± 1.2, p < 0.01), "ocular anatomy understanding" (8.3 ± 1.2 vs 7.6 ± 1.2, p < 0.01), and "confidence in identifying clinical signs" (8.4 ± 1.2 vs 7.5 ± 1.2, p < 0.01). A larger proportion of the students gave higher scores to SPTD compared with SLTT in all questions. All students who responded to the follow-up questionnaire (n = 14) agreed with our interpretation of the data and would support the use of SPTD in undergraduate clinical ophthalmology teaching. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has demonstrated that the utility of SPTD as a teaching aid can significantly increase the satisfaction of undergraduate medical students during their ophthalmology attachment. It offers specific practical advantages in teaching medical students over the traditional SLTT.
