The role of ST-segment elevation in lead aVR in the risk assessment of patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUD AND AIM: Patients with acute pulmonary embolism (APE) present with highly variable symptoms and ECG abnormalities. As ST-elevation in lead aVR has recently been described to predict right ventricular dysfunction (RVD), we aimed to correlate this sign to the severity of APE. METHODS: Three-hundred ninety-six consecutive patients (in centers a and b) with proven APE were retrospectively analysed with respect to 12-lead-ECG, symptoms, thrombus location, echocardiograpy, troponin T, initial therapy and outcome. Data were then compared between patients with and without aVR-ST-elevation. RESULTS: On admission aVR-ST-elevation was present in 34.3% (n = 136). Presence of aVR-ST-elevation was assossiated with more severe clinical presentation (dyspnoea at rest 44.9 vs. 29.2%; p = 0.002, hypotension 17.0 vs. 6.5%; p = 0.001, syncope 16.2 vs. 6.5%; p = 0.002), higher median troponin T levels (0.035 [0.01-0.2] versus 0.01 [0.01-0.02]; p < 0.001), more frequent RVD (74.5 vs. 46.6%; p < 0.001) and central located thrombi (50.8 vs. 29.2; p < 0.001). Thrombolysis was used more frequently (29.1 vs. 7.5%; p < 0.001) and in-hospital-mortality was increased (10.3 vs. 5.4%; p = 0.07) when compared to patients without that sign. Mortality in intermediate-risk APE patients with aVR-ST-elevation was 8.9% compared to 0% in those without (p = 0.04). In contrast, the presence of other classical ECG pattern of APE did not further increase mortality in intermediate-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: ST-elevation in lead aVR is associated with a more severe course of APE, especially in patients with intermediate-risk. Therefore, aVR-ST-elevation might be useful in risk stratification of APE.

The Austrian fulvestrant registry: results from a prospective observation of fulvestrant in postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Endocrine therapy is the preferred treatment in oestrogen- and/or progesterone-receptor (ER/PgR) positive breast cancer. Fulvestrant is a pure ER-antagonist. We present results from the Austrian Fulvestrant Registry. METHODS: Three-hundred and fifty patients were included. Time to progression (TTP) was defined as primary endpoint. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors significantly associated with TTP. RESULTS: Fulvestrant was administered as first-line therapy in 26%, second-line in 49%, and third-line or beyond in 25%. TTP was median 7 months. We observed a response in 15% of patients and 41% had SD > or = 6 months. First-line treatment and non-visceral metastases were associated with longer TTP. One case of pulmonary embolism was reported. Grade 3 toxicities consisted of joint pain (1.4%), nausea (1.4%) and hot flashes (0.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Fulvestrant was effective and well tolerated. TTP was superior to other trials, due to the large proportion of first-line patients. Activity is apparently independent of Her2-status.

Factors influencing the time to development of brain metastases in breast cancer.

This retrospective study analyzed risk factors influencing the time to development of brain metastases with the aim to facilitate the definition of a high-risk population among breast cancer patients. One hundred seventy-four breast cancer patients with brain metastases, treated with whole brain radiotherapy, were evaluated. Statistical analysis included hormone receptor status, HER2/neu status, tumour grading, tumour stage, young age at the time of diagnosis, adjuvant systemic treatment, palliative systemic treatment, metastatic sites (if brain metastases were not the first site of recurrence), and immunotherapy with trastuzumab. Time to development of brain metastases was significantly prolonged by systemic palliative treatment (p< or =0.0001) whereas high tumour grading (p< or =0.04) and trastuzumab therapy (p< or =0.04) significantly shortened this time span. Patients with the brain as first metastatic site, age>35 (p< or =0.001) and stage III (p< or =0.018) at the time of diagnosis had a significantly shorter time to development for brain lesions. These factors should be further validated by a prospective trial to identify a high-risk population amongst breast cancer patients and enable the development of screening programs for early detection.

Trastuzumab and gemcitabine as salvage therapy in heavily pre-treated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: In Her2-postive metastatic breast carcinoma, first-line trastuzumab-based therapy is well established; many centres continue antibody treatment beyond disease progression. In this trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and trastuzumab after earlier exposure to anthracyclines, docetaxel and/or vinorelbine, and trastuzumab. METHODS: Twenty-nine consecutive patients were included as eligible. Patients received gemcitabine at a dose of 1,250 mg/m2 on day one and eight, every 21 days. Trastuzumab was administered in three-week cycles. Clinical benefit rate (CBR; CR + PR + SD > or = 6 months) was defined as primary endpoint. RESULTS: As of July 2007, all patients are evaluable for toxicity, and 26 for response. Earlier therapies consisted of trastuzumab (100%), anthracyclines (100%), vinorelbine (96.6%), docetaxel (72.4%), and capecitabine (72.4%). 19.2% of patients experienced PR, and SD > or = 6 months was observed in a further 26.9%, resulting in a CBR of 46.2%. Time to progression was median 3 months, and overall survival 17 months. Neutropenia (20.7%), thrombocytopenia (13.8%), and nausea (3.4%) were the only treatment-related adverse events that occurred with grade 3 or 4 intensity. Four patients (13.8%) developed brain metastases while on therapy. CONCLUSIONS: While CBR was low when compared to trastuzumab-based first-line therapy, it is higher than what would be expected from gemcitabine monotherapy in a similar setting. Together with the favourable toxicity profile, this regimen appears to be a safe and potentially effective salvage therapy option in a heavily pre-treated population.

Capecitabine and trastuzumab in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: In human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER-2)-positive advanced breast cancer, taxanes or vinorelbine plus trastuzumab are among the most widely applied options in the first-line setting. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine plus trastuzumab after anthracycline and docetaxel or vinorelbine failure and prior trastuzumab exposure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients were included. Capecitabine was administered at a dose of 1,250 mg/m(2) bid for 14 consecutive days in 3-week cycles, with dose modifications if necessary. Trastuzumab was administered every 3 weeks. Time to progression (TTP) was defined as primary end point. Response was evaluated every 3 months using International Union Against Cancer criteria. RESULTS: TTP was a median of 8 months, and overall survival was 24 months. No significant difference was found for second-line and beyond second-line treatment. A complete response (CR) was observed in 2.5%, partial response (PR) in 17.5%, stable disease lasting at least 6 months (SD) in 50%, resulting in a clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD > or = 6 months) of 70%. Diarrhea (5%) and hand-foot syndrome (15%) were the only treatment-related adverse events that occurred with grade 3 or 4 intensity. Three patients (7.5%) developed brain metastases while receiving therapy. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine plus trastuzumab appears to be an effective and safe option in a heavily pretreated population. Therefore, a direct comparison of this regimen with capecitabine monotherapy in this setting is warranted.

Her2 and progesterone receptor status are not predictive of response to fulvestrant treatment.

PURPOSE: It has been hypothesized that response to endocrine therapy for breast cancer depends on Her2 and progesterone receptor status, grading, and tumor proliferation rate. In this study, we evaluated factors that are potentially predictive of response and time to progression in patients treated with fulvestrant. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: One hundred fifty-five patients were included and followed prospectively. Patients received fulvestrant at standard dose by i.m. injection. Response was evaluated every 3 months using International Union Against Cancer criteria. Time to progression and overall survival were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. A multivariate analysis was done to evaluate factors potentially influencing response and time to progression. RESULTS: We observed a partial response in 19 patients (12.3%), stable disease > or =6 months in 56 patients (36.1%), stable disease >3 months but <6 months in 7 patients (4.5%), and progressive disease in 73 patients (47.1%). Median time to progression was 5 months, and median overall survival was 27 months. Probability of achieving clinical benefit was significantly associated with a low proliferation rate (P = 0.015), nonvisceral metastatic sites (P = 0.023), and first-line therapy (P = 0.023). First-line therapy was also associated with prolonged time to progression (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Response rate and time to progression are shown to be independent of Her2 status, grading, and progesterone receptor status. This is probably caused by the unique mechanism of action associated with fulvestrant: Due to receptor down-regulation, it blocks nuclear, cytoplasmatic, and membrane-bound estrogen receptor. Therefore, it seems to inhibit the cross-talk between growth factor receptor signaling and estrogen receptor in a more effective manner.

Expression of thymidine phosphorylase in peripheral blood cells of breast cancer patients is not increased by paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: A synergistic cytotoxic effect has been hypothesized for taxanes and capecitabine, a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil. Based on preclinical studies, this synergism has been attributed to an up-regulation of the enzyme thymidine phosphorylase (TP). Beside tumour tissue, TP is highly expressed in white blood cells, possibly causing increased hematotoxicity, when taxanes are combined with capecitabine. So far, this hypothesis has not been investigated in humans. METHODS: A total of 128 consecutive blood samples were collected from eight patients with advanced breast cancer receiving paclitaxel weekly at a dose of 80 mg/m2. To assess the expression of TP in blood cells, samples were collected prior to first therapy, at the end of infusion, and up to 15 days thereafter. This procedure was repeated during the sixth application of paclitaxel. After isolation of the peripheral mononuclear blood cells, the expression of TP was assessed by ELISA. In parallel, paclitaxel level in plasma was evaluated at three selected time points as pharmacokinetic control parameter. RESULTS: Paclitaxel concentrations at the end of infusion did not change significantly from week 1 to week 6. The expression of TP in peripheral mononuclear blood cells decreased significantly after infusion below pretherapeutic values (p = 0.023; n = 8). After the nadir on day 3, the expression of TP increased moderately returning to baseline levels within one week. The overall picture in week 6 was similar to week 1. Using a trend analysis, neither a short-term nor a long-term induction of TP was observed. CONCLUSION: TP in peripheral mononuclear blood cells was hardly regulated under therapy with paclitaxel. Therefore, no increased haematotoxicity due to TP upregulation is expected from the combination of taxanes and capecitabine.

Trastuzumab prolongs overall survival in patients with brain metastases from Her2 positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases are frequently encountered in Her2 positive advanced breast cancer. It is still not clear, if trastuzumab treatment should be continued following their diagnosis. In this analysis we evaluated if trastuzumab was able to influence time to in-brain progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). For this reason, we compared patients who continued on trastuzumab with a historical control group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventeen Her2 positive patients receiving whole brain radiotherapy for brain metastases and continuing on trastuzumab were identified. As historical control group, thirty-six patients treated before 2002 were identified from a breast cancer database. We performed a multivariate analysis (Cox regression) to explore which factors were potentially able to significantly influence TTP and OS. RESULTS: Median TTP was 6 months, range 1-33+ months. Median OS was 7 months, range 1-38 months. Seventeen patients received trastuzumab after WBRT. Factors associated with prolonged TTP were KPS (p = 0.001), and intensified local treatment (p = 0.004). A trend towards longer TTP was observed in patients treated with trastuzumab (p = 0.068). OS was significantly influenced by KPS (p < 0.001), and continued antibody therapy (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Two parameters were significantly associated with prolonged OS: KPS and trastuzumab. While there was a trend towards prolonged TTP in patients with trastuzumab treatment after WBRT, this did not reach statistical significance. It appears therefore reasonable to suggest continuation of antibody therapy in patients with good performance status despite disease spreading to the brain. Concerning activity of trastuzumab in brain metastases themselves, no final conclusion is possible.

Pathologic complete response with six compared with three cycles of neoadjuvant epirubicin plus docetaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in operable breast cancer: results of ABCSG-14.

PURPOSE: Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy for operable breast cancer downstages tumors initially not suitable for breast-conserving surgery. A pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be a surrogate for longer overall survival, but this beneficial effect remains to be established. This phase III trial evaluated whether doubling the number of cycles of neoadjuvant treatment increased the pCR rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with biopsy-proven breast cancer (T1-4a-c, N+/-, M0; stage I to III) were eligible and randomly assigned to either three or six cycles of epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on days 3 through 10 (ED+G), every 21 days. The primary end point was the pCR rate of the breast tumor. Secondary end points were pathologic nodal status after surgery and the rate of breast-conserving surgery. RESULTS: A total of 292 patients were accrued, and 288 patients were assessable for efficacy and safety. Groups were well balanced for known prognostic factors. Six cycles of ED+G, compared with three cycles, resulted in a significantly higher pCR rate (18.6% v 7.7%, respectively; P = .0045), a higher percentage of patients with negative axillary status (56.6% v 42.8%, respectively; P = .02), and a trend towards more breast-conserving surgery (75.9% v 66.9%, respectively; P = .10). Rates of adverse events were similar, and no patients died on treatment. CONCLUSION: Doubling the number of neoadjuvant ED+G cycles from three to six results in higher rates of pCR and negative axillary nodal status with no excess of adverse effects. Thus, six cycles of ED+G should be the standard neoadjuvant treatment for operable breast cancer if this combination is chosen.

HER-2-positive breast cancer: hope beyond trastuzumab.

Therapeutic antibodies have shown great promise as targeted agents in the treatment of patients with cancer. Trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2), is of special importance in breast cancers overexpressing HER-2. Such rationally designed substances bind to cancer cells expressing the targeted antigen and, by various mechanisms, lead to tumor cell degradation. Only one-third of patients, however, initially respond to trastuzumab monotherapy and the majority of initial responders demonstrate disease progression within 1 year of treatment initiation. Therefore, alternative compounds targeting the HER-2 receptor or downstream signaling pathways are of great importance. Lapatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, blocking tryosine kinase domains of both epidermal growth factor receptor and HER-2. This substance holds promise for the treatment of cancer after trastuzumab failure, and might be active in cerebral metastases. Other strategies in trastuzumab-resistant disease include bispecific antibodies (which bind to HER-2 and Fc receptors, thereby directing immune cells towards the tumor), the combination of antibodies, or targeting tumor vessel growth by blocking vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or VEGF receptors. Heat shock protein 90, a chaperone protein that controls the folding of HER-2, also represents a potential target. Multi-targeted kinase inhibitors such as sunitinib or sortenib are already established in renal cell cancer. These compounds are currently being evaluated in breast cancer and might represent interesting options both in HER-2-positive and -negative disease. In conclusion, trastuzumab remains the gold standard in HER-2-positive breast cancer therapy. However, in trastuzumab-resistant disease, new strategies and compounds are currently under evaluation.

Results from an observational trial with oral vinorelbine and trastuzumab in advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of oral vinorelbine plus trastuzumab (OV + T) in Her2 positive advanced breast cancer as first line chemotherapy or after progressing on earlier treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients (median age: 59 years) were included. Patients received OV in a dose of 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 8, q=21, without dose escalation. Trastuzumab was administered every 3 weeks at a dose of 6 mg/kg bodyweight after a loading dose of 8 mg/kg. Response was evaluated every three cycles using UICC criteria. Time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. A multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate factors potentially influencing response rate and TTP. RESULTS: Median time of observation was 20 months. We observed a complete response in 18% of patients, partial remission in 50%, stable disease >or= 6 months in 21%, and progressive disease in 11%. TTP was median 9 months. OS was not reached. Response rate and TTP were influenced by line of treatment only. The main toxicities consisted of neutropenia and nausea. CONCLUSIONS: OV + T appears to be an effective and safe treatment option in advanced breast cancer at the dose and schedule chosen.

Invasive ductal carcinoma and invasive lobular carcinoma of breast differ in response following neoadjuvant therapy with epidoxorubicin and docetaxel + G-CSF.

PURPOSE: Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with primary breast cancer treated with anthracyclines and taxanes results in high response rates, allowing breast conserving surgery (BCS) in patients primarily not suitable for this procedure. Pathological responses are important prognostic parameters for progression free and overall survival. We questioned the impact of histologic type invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) versus invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) on response to primary chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 161 patients with breast cancer received preoperative chemotherapy consisted of epidoxorubicin 75 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) administered in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) on days 3-10 (ED + G). Pathological complete response (pCR), biological markers and type of surgery as well as progression free and overall survival were compared between IDC and ILC. RESULTS: Out of 161 patients, 124 patients presented with IDC and 37 with ILC. Patients with ILC were less likely to have a pCR (3% vs. 20%, P < 0.009) and breast conserving surgeries (51% vs. 79%, P < 0.001). Patients with ILC tended to have oestrogen receptor positive tumors (86% vs. 52%, P < 0.0001), HER 2 negative tumors (69% vs. 84%), and lower nuclear grade (nuclear grade 3, 16% vs. 46%, P < 0.001). Patients with ILC tended to have longer time to progression (TTP) (42 months vs. 26 months) and overall survival (69 months vs. 65 months). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that patients with ILC achieved a lower pCR rate and ineligibility for BCS to preoperative chemotherapy, but this did not result in a survival disadvantage. Because of these results new strategies to achieve a pCR are warranted.

Trastuzumab in the management of early and advanced stage breast cancer.

Trastuzumab is a monoclonal humanized antibody that has revolutionized the treatment of patients with Her2-positive breast cancer. Already well established in advanced stage disease, the substance was recently introduced in the adjuvant setting, reducing disease recurrences by more than 50% and mortality by approximately one third. Trastuzumab is a rationally designed substance which binds to cancer cells expressing the targeted antigen, and, by different mechanisms, causes tumor cell degradation. However, only one third of patients have an initial response to trastuzumab therapy, and the majority of initial responders demonstrate disease progression within 1 year of treatment initiation. It is therefore necessary to gain further insight into mechanisms of resistance, and develop ways to overcome those. In this article, the role of trastuzumab in early and advanced stage breast cancer is reviewed. We discuss current understandings of the specific tumor biology of Her2-positive breast cancer, and review the mechanism of action of trastuzumab. Further, we try to highlight possible mechanisms of resistance.

Intensified local treatment and systemic therapy significantly increase survival in patients with brain metastases from advanced breast cancer - a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases have evolved from a rare to a frequently encountered event in advanced breast cancer due to advances in palliative systemic treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All Patients treated at our centre from 1994 to 2004 with WBRT for brain metastases from breast cancer were included. We performed a multivariate analysis (Cox regression) to explore which factors are able to influence significantly cerebral time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (metastatic sites [visceral versus non-visceral], Karnofsky performance score [KPS], age, intensified local treatment [boost irradiation, neuro-surgical resection] further systemic treatment). RESULTS: Overall 174 patients, median age 51 years, range 27-76 years, were included. Median TTP was 3 months (m), range 1-33+ m. Median overall survival was 7 m, range 1-44 m. Factors significantly influencing TTP were KPS (p = 0.002), intensified local treatment (p < 0.001), and palliative systemic treatment (p = 0.001). Factors significantly influencing survival were intensified local treatment (p = 0.004), metastatic sites (p = 0.008), KPS (p = 0.006), and palliative systemic treatment (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: As shown by the significant influence of metastatic sites, some patients die from their advanced systemic tumour situation before they would die from cerebral progression. In other individuals however, intensified local treatment and systemic treatment appear to influence cerebral time to progression and overall survival.

Severe enteropathy associated with raltitrexed and oxaliplatin chemotherapy: report of two patients experiencing this rare, potentially lethal gastrointestinal adverse event.

Among the several different combination chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed has shown encouraging therapeutic results and a fairly good toxicity profile. Here, we report on two patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving this combination therapy, which leads to severe enterocolitis and neutropenia resulting in death in one patient. One patient was a 67-year-old woman suffering from an adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid colon with multiple liver metastases. The other patient was a 74-year-old woman with colon cancer, and metachronous multiple pulmonal and hepatic metastases. In both patients, palliative chemotherapy consisted of oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 in combination with raltitrexed 3 mg/m2 on day 1 every 21 days. Both patients developed neutropenia in combination with severe enterocolitis after the fourth and the second chemotherapy cycle, respectively. Despite antibiotic treatment, diarrhea persisted in both patients for weeks. One patient died 17 days after hospital admission because of enteric sepsis with bleeding of the colonic mucosa and multiorgan failure. The other patient recovered completely and was discharged from hospital after 8 weeks. Severe enterocolitis, a hitherto infrequently recognized adverse event, which has been described in association with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and oxaliplatin chemotherapy, may also occur with raltitrexed and oxaliplatin. Physicians should be aware of this rare, although potentially lethal, gastrointestinal toxicity.

Analysis of trastuzumab and chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer after the failure of at least one earlier combination: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Combining trastuzumab and chemotherapy is standard in her2/neu overexpressing advanced breast cancer. It is not established however, whether trastuzumab treatment should continue after the failure of one earlier combination. In this trial, we report our experience with continued treatment beyond disease progression. METHODS: Fifty-four patients, median age 46 years, range 25-73 years, were included. We analysed for time to tumour progression (TTP) for first, second and beyond second line treatment, response rates and overall survival. RESULTS: Median time of observation was 24 months, range 7-51. Response rates for first line treatment were 7.4% complete remission (CR), 35.2% partial remissions (PR), 42.6% stable disease > 6 months (SD) and 14.8% of patients experienced disease progression despite treatment (PD). Corresponding numbers for second line were 3.7% CR, 22.2% PR, 42.6% SD and 31.5% PD; numbers for treatment beyond second line (60 therapies, 33 pts 3rd line, 18 pts 4th line, 6 pts 5th line, 2 pts 6th line and 1 patient 7th line) were 1.7% CR, 28.3% PR, 28.3% SD and 41.6% PD respectively. Median TTP was 6 months (m) in the first line setting, and also 6 m for second line and beyond second line. An asymptomatic drop of left ventricular ejection fraction below 50% was observed in one patient. No case of symptomatic congestive heart failure was observed. CONCLUSION: The data presented clearly strengthen evidence that patients do profit from continued trastuzumab treatment. The fact that TTP did not decrease significantly from first line to beyond second line treatment is especially noteworthy. Still, randomized trials are warranted.

Prognostic value of monitoring tumour markers CA 15-3 and CEA during fulvestrant treatment.

BACKGROUND: At many centres tumour markers are used to detect disease recurrence and to monitor response to therapy in patients with advanced disease, although the real value of serial observation of marker levels remains disputed. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of tumour markers for predicting response (partial response [PR], stable disease [SD] > or = 6 months), de novo disease progression (PD) and secondary PD in patients receiving fulvestrant ('Faslodex') 250 mg/month for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: Changes in cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were prospectively monitored (monthly) and were also evaluated for the 3 months preceding secondary PD. Data from 67 patients with previously treated MBC participating in a Compassionate Use Programme were analysed. RESULTS: In patients with a PR (n = 7 [10.4%]), a non-significant increase in CA 15-3 occurred during the first 6 months of treatment; CEA was significantly reduced (P = 0.0165). In patients with SD >/= 6 months (n = 28 [41.8%]), both CA 15-3 (P < 0.0001) and CEA (P = 0.0399) levels increased significantly after 6 months treatment. In those experiencing de novo PD (n = 32 [47.8%]), CA 15-3 increased significantly (P < 0.0001) after 4 months; CEA also increased significantly (P = 0.0002) during the same time period. Both CA 15-3 (P < 0.0001) and CEA (P < 0.0001) increased significantly in the 3 months preceding secondary PD. CONCLUSION: CA 15-3 increases in patients progressing on fulvestrant but may also increase in those experiencing clinical benefit; this should not be taken as a sign of PD without verification. Overall, both CA 15-3 and CEA appear to be poor prognostic markers for determining progression in patients receiving fulvestrant.

Oral vinorelbine alone or in combination with trastuzumab in advanced breast cancer: results from a pilot trial.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the efficacy of oral vinorelbine (OV) (Navelbine oral Boeringer-Ingelheim Austria) in patients with advanced breast cancer as first-line therapy or after progressing under earlier line chemotherapies alone or in combination with trastuzumab (T). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight patients [median age: 63.5 years (y), range (r): 38-84 years] were included into this trial. Patients with her-2/neu positive tumours received a combination of OV and T. Treatment effect was evaluated every three cycles and treatment continued until progression. OV was administered in a dose of 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 8, q = 21 days, and no dose escalation to 80 mg/m(2) was performed. RESULTS: We observed a complete response in 5.9% of patients, partial remission in 22.1%, stable disease (SD) > 6 months in 33.8%, SD < 6 months in 2.9%, and progression despite treatment in 35.3%, respectively. Time to progression was 6 months (range 1-23+). The main toxicities consisted of nausea/vomiting (N/V) and neutropenia. Grade IV neutropenia was found in 5 patients (6.4%), grade III in 6 patients (7.7%) and grade I and II in 11.5%. We did not find any grade IV N/V in our patients, however, grade III N/V was observed in 3.8%. No other grade III and IV toxicities were reported. CONCLUSION: OV appears to be effective in the treatment of advanced breast cancer at the dose and schedule chosen. It is well tolerated, effective, and the oral formulation is an advantage for the patients as well as for the nursing staff.

Clinical restenosis after coronary stent implantation is associated with the heme oxygenase-1 gene promoter polymorphism and the heme oxygenase-1 +99G/C variant.

BACKGROUND: Vascular remodeling after percutaneous coronary stent implantation frequently leads to restenosis. Heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) is involved in the generation of the endogenous antioxidant bilirubin and carbon monoxide, both of which exert antiinflammatory and antiproliferative effects. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of genetic risk factors combined with the conventional risk factors on the development of coronary restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation. METHODS: The HO-1 gene GT dinucleotide repeat promoter polymorphism and HO-1 +99G/C variant were evaluated in 199 patients with coronary artery disease after coronary stent implantation and control angiography at 6 months after the intervention. Coronary restenosis was confirmed by quantitative angiography. RESULTS: Carriers of the long allele of the HO-1 gene promoter (>29 repeats) had a significantly higher risk of developing restenosis after PCI than noncarriers [odds ratio (OR)=1.9; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.0-3.4; P=0.04]. Interestingly, the allele longer than 29 repeats conferred a significantly higher risk of developing restenosis (OR=3.4; 95% CI, 1.2-9.1; P=0.017) in nonsmokers than in smokers (OR=2.0; 95% CI, 0.7-5.2; P=0.18). CONCLUSIONS: The long allele of the HO-1 gene promoter (>29 repeats) polymorphism, which leads to low HO-1 inducibility, may represent an independent prognostic marker for restenosis after PCI and stent implantation. The effect of the >29 repeat allele is attenuated in smokers, who have chronic exogenous CO exposure.

Preoperative second-line chemotherapy induces objective responses in primary breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with primary breast cancer results in high response rates, allowing breast-conserving surgery in patients primarily not suitable for this procedure. Tumors of patients with histologically proven breast cancer that fail to respond to preoperative chemotherapy are thought to be chemotherapy resistant. We questioned this hypothesis and treated 13 patients who did not respond to preoperative anthracycline-containing first-line treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight patients received a combination therapy consisting of epidoxorubicin and docetaxel as neoadjuvant first-line treatment and were treated with CMF as preoperative second-line chemotherapy. The other five patients did not respond to first-line FEC and were given paclitaxel or docetaxel as second-line treatment. RESULTS: A major response to treatment was observed in 10 of 13 patients (77%) during preoperative second-line therapy: one patient (8%) achieved pathological complete response (pCR) and nine patients (69%) partial response (PR). Three patients (23%) had stable disease (SD), and no patient had progressive disease (PD). Eight patients (62%) could undergo breast-conserving surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that it is possible to achieve objective responses including pCR with potentially non-cross-resistant neoadjuvant second-line therapy, leading to breast-conserving surgery in a high proportion of patients. Thus, preoperative second-line chemotherapy appears to be justified when breast conservation is an important treatment goal and may have potential in improved tailoring of neoadjuvant treatments.