Ewing Sarcoma of the Female Genital Tract: Clinicopathologic Analysis of 21 Cases With an Emphasis on the Differential Diagnosis of Gynecologic Round Cell, Spindle, and Epithelioid Neoplasms.

Ewing sarcoma is an uncommon neoplasm considered in the differential diagnosis of tumors with "small round cell" morphology, but its occurrence in the gynecologic tract has only been sporadically documented. Herein, we describe the largest cohort of Ewing sarcoma localized to the female genital tract to date, and emphasize their clinicopathologic resemblance to more common gynecologic neoplasms. Ewing sarcoma (n=21) was retrospectively identified from 5 institutions. The average patient age was 35 (range 6-61) years. Tumor sites included uterus (n=8), cervix (n=4), vulva (n=5), vagina (n=1), broad ligament (n=1), inguinal area (n=1), and pelvis (n=1). Nine of 18 cases in which slides were available for review demonstrated only classic round cell morphology, with the remainder showing a variable combination and prominence of variant ovoid/spindle or epithelioid appearance. Tumors showed diffuse membranous reactivity for CD99 (20/20) and were positive for NKX2.2 (8/8, diffuse) and cyclin D1 (7/7, of which 3/7 were patchy/multifocal and 4/7 were diffuse). They were negative for ER (0/6) and CD10 (0/6). Three cases were initially diagnosed as endometrial stromal sarcomas. EWSR1 rearrangement was confirmed in 20/21 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (n=15) and/or sequencing (n=8). Of the eight tumors that underwent sequencing, 6 harbored FLI1 , 1 ERG, and 1 FEV as the fusion partner. Of 11 patients with available follow-up, 5 died of disease, 1 developed lung metastases and 5 are alive with no evidence of disease. Ewing sarcoma of the gynecologic tract is a rare, aggressive entity that shares some morphologic and immunohistochemical features with other more common gynecologic neoplasms. In addition to the typical round cell appearance, variant spindled/ovoid to epithelioid morphology may also be observed and should prompt consideration of this entity with appropriate immunohistochemical and/or molecular studies.

Atypical Endometriosis: Comprehensive Characterization of Clinicopathologic, Immunohistochemical, and Molecular Features.

Atypical endometriosis (A-EMS), defined by cytologic atypia and/or crowded glands resembling endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, remains poorly understood. We aimed to refine the morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of A-EMS in an institutional series. Cases were identified through a structured search and reviewed by 2 pathologists. Immunohistochemistry and comprehensive sequencing using a panel 447-gene coverage were performed in suitable cases. A-EMS with synchronous and/or subsequent EMS-related neoplasia were compared with those without. Of 4598 EMS cases over an 11-yr period, 36 A-EMS were identified. The mean age at presentation was 46 (range 26-68) yr. Locations included the ovary (24, 66%), tubo-ovary (6, 17%), fallopian tube (3, 8%), and peritoneum (3, 8%). The mean size was 6.5 (range 0.5-40) mm. Cytologic atypia was mild in 4 (11%), moderate in 21 (58%), and severe in 11 (31%). Most lesions were partially or completely flat (28, 78%); of these, 66% showed hobnail nuclei. Crowded/cribriform and micropapillary/papillary patterns were seen in 11 (31%) and 16 (44%) A-EMS, respectively. Immunohistochemistry, performed in 33 A-EMS, showed wildtype p53 (100%) retained PMS2/MSH6 (100%), and positive estrogen receptor (97%, mean 65% cells), progesterone receptor (76%, mean 30% cells), and Napsin A (39%). Ki67 labelling was <1% to 10% (median 5%). Nine (25%) patients presented with concurrent or subsequent ipsilateral endometrioid, seromucinous, or clear cell neoplasia (4 borderline tumors and 4 carcinomas). The only A-EMS feature statistically more frequent in this subset was crowded/glands (6/9 vs. 2/27 A-EMS without, P =0.001 Fisher exact test). Sequencing showed pathogenic variants in 5 of 6 cases analyzed, involving ATM , BRCA2 , KRAS , AKT , CTNNB1 , PTEN , and ARID1A among other genes. In 2 cases, synchronous neoplasia showed an accumulation of additional variants. A-EMS is characterized by cytologic atypia and crowded architecture but low proliferation index, positive estrogen receptor, and normal p53 and MMR, which can be helpful in the distinction from malignancy. The prevalence of synchronous/subsequent tubo-ovarian neoplasia in our series was 25%, significantly higher than the reported 1% in conventional EMS. Moreover, A-EMS harbors genomic alterations seen in EMS-related tumors and shares pathogenic variants with synchronous ipsilateral neoplasia. Therefore, it is important to report A-EMS as currently defined and describe its architectural features, especially gland crowding as this appears to increase the risk of EMS-related epithelial neoplasia. Napsin-A is often positive in A-EMS and should be interpreted with caution.

Localized Endometrial Proliferations of Pregnancy are Clonal Glandular Outgrowths Characterized by PTEN Loss and PIK3CA Pathogenic Variants.

Gestational endometrium can demonstrate a spectrum of atypical but benign changes. One such lesion is localized endometrial proliferation of pregnancy (LEPP), first described in a series of 11 cases. To understand its biological and clinical importance, we explore the pathologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular features of this entity. Nine cases of LEPP identified in 15 years were retrieved from departmental archives and reviewed. Immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing using a comprehensive 446-gene panel were performed when the material was available. Eight cases were identified in curettage specimens performed after first-trimester pregnancy loss, and 1 in the basal plate of a mature placenta. The mean patient age was 35 (range 27-41) years. The mean lesion size was 6.3 (range 2-12) mm. Architectural patterns, often coexisting in the same case, included cribriform (n = 7), solid (n = 5), villoglandular (n = 2), papillary (n = 2), and micropapillary (n = 1). Cytologic atypia was mild in 7 cases and moderate in 2. Mitotic activity was low (up to 3 per 2.4 mm2). All lesions were associated with neutrophils. Background Arias-Stella phenomenon was present in 4 cases. Immunohistochemistry was performed in 7 LEPP, all of which demonstrated wildtype p53, retained MSH6 and PMS2, membranous beta-catenin, and positive estrogen receptor (mean 71%) and progesterone receptor (mean 74%). All were negative for p40 except 1 case (focal weak positivity). PTEN was markedly reduced in background secretory glands in all cases; in 5/7, LEPP foci showed a complete absence of PTEN expression. PIK3CA pathogenic variants were identified in 4/4 cases sequenced; 3/4 had inactivating PTEN mutations. Follow-up, available in 8 patients (mean length = 51 months, range 7-161), was conservative with observation only and showed no persistence or adverse outcomes. LEPP is characterized by intraglandular cribriform/solid architecture, positive estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor, PTEN loss, and PIK3CA and PTEN mutations. Although our findings indicate that LEPP is neoplastic, for now, we advise against diagnosing LEPP as endometrial carcinoma or hyperplasia because LEPP has a particular clinicopathologic context (concurrent gestation), distinct morphology (purely intraepithelial complex growth), and indolent outcome. Thus, it should be distinguished from endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinoma for which therapeutic interventions are indicated.