DPYD genotype-guided dose individualisation of fluoropyrimidine therapy in patients with cancer: a prospective safety analysis.

BACKGROUND: Fluoropyrimidine treatment can result in severe toxicity in up to 30% of patients and is often the result of reduced activity of the key metabolic enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), mostly caused by genetic variants in the gene encoding DPD (DPYD). We assessed the effect of prospective screening for the four most relevant DPYD variants (DPYD*2A [rs3918290, c.1905+1G>A, IVS14+1G>A], c.2846A>T [rs67376798, D949V], c.1679T>G [rs55886062, DPYD*13, I560S], and c.1236G>A [rs56038477, E412E, in haplotype B3]) on patient safety and subsequent DPYD genotype-guided dose individualisation in daily clinical care. METHODS: In this prospective, multicentre, safety analysis in 17 hospitals in the Netherlands, the study population consisted of adult patients (≥18 years) with cancer who were intended to start on a fluoropyrimidine-based anticancer therapy (capecitabine or fluorouracil as single agent or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents or radiotherapy). Patients with all tumour types for which fluoropyrimidine-based therapy was considered in their best interest were eligible. We did prospective genotyping for DPYD*2A, c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G, and c.1236G>A. Heterozygous DPYD variant allele carriers received an initial dose reduction of 25% (c.2846A>T and c.1236G>A) or 50% (DPYD*2A and c.1679T>G), and DPYD wild-type patients were treated according to the current standard of care. The primary endpoint of the study was the frequency of severe (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 grade ≥3) overall fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity across the entire treatment duration. We compared toxicity incidence between DPYD variant allele carriers and DPYD wild-type patients on an intention-to-treat basis, and relative risks (RRs) for severe toxicity were compared between the current study and a historical cohort of DPYD variant allele carriers treated with full dose fluoropyrimidine-based therapy (derived from a previously published meta-analysis). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02324452, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between April 30, 2015, and Dec 21, 2017, we enrolled 1181 patients. 78 patients were considered non-evaluable, because they were retrospectively identified as not meeting inclusion criteria, did not start fluoropyrimidine-based treatment, or were homozygous or compound heterozygous DPYD variant allele carriers. Of 1103 evaluable patients, 85 (8%) were heterozygous DPYD variant allele carriers, and 1018 (92%) were DPYD wild-type patients. Overall, fluoropyrimidine-related severe toxicity was higher in DPYD variant carriers (33 [39%] of 85 patients) than in wild-type patients (231 [23%] of 1018 patients; p=0·0013). The RR for severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity was 1·31 (95% CI 0·63-2·73) for genotype-guided dosing compared with 2·87 (2·14-3·86) in the historical cohort for DPYD*2A carriers, no toxicity compared with 4·30 (2·10-8·80) in c.1679T>G carriers, 2·00 (1·19-3·34) compared with 3·11 (2·25-4·28) for c.2846A>T carriers, and 1·69 (1·18-2·42) compared with 1·72 (1·22-2·42) for c.1236G>A carriers. INTERPRETATION: Prospective DPYD genotyping was feasible in routine clinical practice, and DPYD genotype-based dose reductions improved patient safety of fluoropyrimidine treatment. For DPYD*2A and c.1679T>G carriers, a 50% initial dose reduction was adequate. For c.1236G>A and c.2846A>T carriers, a larger dose reduction of 50% (instead of 25%) requires investigation. Since fluoropyrimidines are among the most commonly used anticancer agents, these findings suggest that implementation of DPYD genotype-guided individualised dosing should be a new standard of care. FUNDING: Dutch Cancer Society.

Variations in pelvic lymph node dissection in invasive bladder cancer: A Dutch nationwide population-based study during centralization of care.

OBJECTIVES: To assess temporal trends in radical cystectomy (RC) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) and the effect of centralization of care in the Netherlands between 2006 and 2012. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This nationwide population-based study included 3524 patients from the Netherlands Cancer Registry who underwent RC as the primary treatment for cT1-4a, N0 or Nx, M0 urothelial carcinoma. Annual application rates of PLND, median LNC, and rates of node-positive disease (pN+) were compared by linear-by-linear association. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify patients׳ and hospital characteristics associated with PLND and LNC≥10, and to study associations between LNC and pN+disease. RESULTS: In total, 3,191 (91%) patients had PLND during RC and the use increased from 84% in 2006 to 96% in 2012 (P<0.001). Owing to centralization of care in 2010 (at least 10RCs/y/hospital), significantly more patients were treated in high-volume hospitals (≥20RC per year) in 2011 and 2012. PLND use was highest in males, younger patients and in academic, teaching, and high-volume hospitals (≥20RC per year). In 2012, PLND application rates were comparable for academic, teaching, and nonteaching hospitals (P = 0.344). Median LNC increased from 7 in 2006 to 13 in 2012 (P<0.001), 55% had an LNC≥10 (63% in 2012). Furthermore, lymph node count (LNC)≥10 was associated with cT3-4a and, pN+disease, R0 and treatment in academic, teaching, or high-volume hospitals (≥20RC per year). Rate of pN+disease increased from 18% to 24% between 2006 and 2012 (P = 0.014). This trend was significantly associated with increased LNC on a continuous scale (odds ratio = 1.03). CONCLUSIONS: After centralization of care, PLND during RC for cT1-4a, N0 or Nx, M0 urothelial carcinoma has become standard in all types of Dutch hospitals. The increase in LNC between 2006 and 2012 was associated with a higher incidence of pN+disease and suggests more adequate template extension and adherence to contemporary guidelines in recent years.

Lymph node count at radical cystectomy does not influence long-term survival if surgeons adhere to a standardized template.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple bladder cancer studies report that the number of removed lymph nodes (lymph node count [LNC]) at radical cystectomy (RC) is positively associated with survival. Although these reports suggest that LNC can be used as a proxy for surgical quality, all studies used variable or inconsistent pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) templates. We therefore wished to establish whether LNC at RC influences survival if surgeons adhere to a standardized PLND template. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 274 patients who underwent RC from January 2005 until December 2012. All RCs were performed in either one of 2 hospitals (hospital A or B) by the same 4 urologists (all from hospital A) and a standardized PLND template was applied. PLND specimens were processed by 2 independent pathology departments (hospital A and B). We used Cox regression analysis to investigate the prognostic value of LNC adjusted for patient characteristics. We also compared LNC between hospitals and surgeons and investigated the effect of both the variables on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Median LNC was 17 (interquartile range = 12). At a median follow-up of 64.3 months, there was no association between LNC and OS (P = 0.328), CSS (P = 0.645), or DFS (P = 0.450). Median LNC was higher in hospital B than in hospital A (20.0 vs. 16.0, P = 0.003). Median LNC varied significantly among surgeons (12-20, P<0.001). Neither the hospital of surgery nor the surgeon performing PLND influenced OS (P = 0.771 and P = 0.982, respectively), CSS (P = 0.310 and P = 0.691, respectively), or DFS (P = 0.256 and P = 0.296, respectively). CONCLUSION: If surgeons adhere to a standardized template, LNC at RC does not affect long-term survival.

Phase II and pharmacological study of oral docetaxel plus cyclosporin A in anthracycline pre-treated metastatic breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Previously, we demonstrated that oral docetaxel plus the P-glycoprotein (Pgp; ABCB1) inhibitor cyclosporin A (CsA) is safe and results in adequate exposure to docetaxel. This phase II study evaluates the anti-tumor activity, safety and pharmacokinetics of oral docetaxel in combination with CsA in women with advanced breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable advanced breast cancer were given one flat dose of 100 mg oral docetaxel, preceded by one single dose of 15 mg/kg CsA, weekly for 6 weeks in a cycle of 8 weeks. Pharmacokinetic monitoring of docetaxel and CsA was performed in week 1 and 9. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients with a median age of 50 years were recruited. Thirty patients were evaluable for toxicity and twenty-six for response. All had received prior anthracycline treatment. The treatment was generally well tolerated with manageable toxicity although many patients needed a dose reduction, most commonly because of fatigue and uncomplicated neutropenia. The median treatment duration was 16 weeks (range 6 - 32). The overall response rate in evaluable patients was 42% (95% CI: 23 - 63) and the median overall survival was 12.2 months (8.4 - 23.1). The interpatient variability in the area under the curve of 100 mg orally administered docetaxel was moderate, respectively 49 and 30% in week 1 and 9. CONCLUSION: Weekly oral docetaxel, combined with the booster drug CsA, is an active and safe treatment in anthracycline pre-treated patients with advanced breast cancer.