Discordant cardiac biomarker levels independently predict outcome in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

AIMS: To investigate the prognostic relevance of elevated Troponin T (cTnT) levels in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) without significant creatine kinase (CK) elevation on admission. METHODS AND RESULTS: From January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2006 patients with STEMI without significant CK elevation (<2-fold) on admission treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were included and stratified according to cTnT plasma levels. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to find independent predictors for mortality. During the 5-year period 514 patients with STEMI and normal CK plasma levels were included. 308 (59.9 %) patients had cTnT levels <0.1 µg/l and 206 (40.1 %) patients had cTnT levels ≥0.1 µg/l. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified cTnT levels ≥0.1 µg/l and 3-vessel disease as positive, and hemoglobin levels as negative independent predictors for long-term mortality. Discordantly elevated cTnT plasma levels independently predicted higher mortality rates in the first year (HR 3.9, 95 % CI 1.7-9.1, p = 0.002) and during 5 years (HR 2.3, 95 % CI 1.4-3.9, p = 0.002) after PCI for STEMI. CONCLUSIONS: Discordant elevation of cTnT in the presence of normal CK plasma levels on admission is associated with increased mortality in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. This may be due to preceding microembolization.

Retrieval of lost coronary guidewires during challenging percutaneous coronary interventions.

INTRODUCTION: The presence of symptomatic or asymptomatic intravascular/intracardiac foreign body (FB) is underreported in the literature, but it is more commonly encountered in clinical practice. Nowadays, losing a coronary stent or a guidewire has become a rare event. However, due to the constant increase in the total number of worldwide performed coronary interventions (PCI) and especially due to an increase also in the technical difficulties of these procedures (i.e., new devices+complex techniques), this kind of "lost FB complication" may again become clinically relevant. CASE REPORTS: We report two cases where, during challenging PCIs, 0.014-in. guidewires broke, remaining firmly anchored in the coronary tree floating with their proximal part in the aorta. These wires could have been successfully retrieved with a dedicated three-dimensional snare device, which is specifically manufactured for facilitating this kind of retrieval interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary lost guidewires, if untreated, may lead to serious cardiovascular complications, suggesting that one should attempt every possible maneuver to retrieve them from the coronary circulation. By describing the peculiarity of the Entrio snare device, we finally suggest that this kind of dedicated three-dimensional snare device is an excellent tool at cardiologists' disposal for retrieving intracardiac and intravascular lost wires.

Contemporary practices in postcardiac arrest syndrome: the role of mild therapeutic hypothermia.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest remains a major cause of mortality and morbidity despite progress in resuscitative practices. The number of survivors with severe neurological impairment at hospital discharge is similarly dismal. Recently, much attention has been directed toward the use of mild therapeutic hypothermia in the care of comatose survivors with postcardiac arrest syndrome. Recent research suggests mild hypothermia lowers mortality and improves neurological outcome after successful treatment of cardiac arrest. The current 2005 updated guidelines of International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation and European Resuscitation Council recommend the utilization of mild induced hypothermia in postresuscitation treatment. Hypothermia induction in order to avoid the pathophysiological mechanisms of euthermia and hyperthermia and subsequent complications are briefly discussed. Cooling methods, potential side effects and questions regarding implementation of therapeutic hypothermia recommendations in every day clinical practice and future investigation are also addressed.

Long-term outcome of percutaneous catheter intervention for de novo coronary bifurcation lesions with drug-eluting stents or bare-metal stents.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term risks and benefits of drug-eluting stents (DESs) compared with bare-metal stents (BMSs) for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions. METHODS: Our registry comprised 1,038 patients treated for coronary bifurcation lesion according to the provisional T-stenting strategy who were followed up for 3 years. RESULTS: Target lesion revascularization rates were 24.3% for BMSs (n = 337), 15.6% for sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs, n = 422), and 17.3% for paclitaxel-eluting stents (PESs, n = 279) (P = .003 BMSs vs DESs, P = .54 SESs vs PESs). The respective incidences were 11.4%, 9.5%, and 14.8% (P = .65, P = .13) for death and myocardial infarction and 9.9%, 6.5%, and 10.6% (P = .72, P = .19) for death. Propensity score adjusted hazard ratios (95% CI) for DESs versus BMSs were 0.49 (0.35-0.68, P < .001) for target lesion revascularization, 0.94 (0.64-1.40, P = .078) for death and myocardial infarction, and 0.85 (0.55-1.32, P = .47) for death. We did not find any significant differences between SESs and PESs, except for an increased risk of death after PESs compared with SESs (but not BMSs) in the subgroup receiving a side-branch stent (adjusted hazard ratio 2.45, 95% CI 1.05-5.73, P = .035). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with BMSs, both PESs and SESs substantially reduced the long-term need for repeated revascularization but did not increase the risk of death and myocardial infarction.

Randomized trial on routine vs. provisional T-stenting in the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions.

AIMS: We investigated whether routine T-stenting reduces restenosis of the side branch as compared with provisional T-stenting in patients with de novo coronary bifurcation lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Our randomized study assigned 101 patients with a coronary bifurcation lesion to routine T-stenting with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in both branches and 101 patients to provisional T-stenting with SES placement in the main branch followed by kissing-balloon angioplasty and provisional SES placement in the side branch only for inadequate results. Primary endpoint was per cent diameter stenosis of the side branch at 9 month angiographic follow-up. Angiographic follow-up in 192 (95%) patients revealed a per cent stenosis of the side branch of 23.0 +/- 20.2% after provisional T-stenting (19% with side-branch stent) and of 27.7 +/- 24.8% (P = 0.15) after routine T-stenting (98.2% with side-branch stent). The corresponding binary restenosis rates were 9.4 and 12.5% (P = 0.32), prompting re-intervention in 5.0 and 7.9% (P = 0.39), respectively. In the main branch, binary restenosis rates were 7.3% after provisional and 3.1% after routine T-stenting (P = 0.17). The overall 1 year incidence of target lesion re-intervention was 10.9% after provisional and 8.9% after routine T-stenting (P = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Routine T-stenting with SES did not improve the angiographic outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention of coronary bifurcation lesions as compared with stenting of the main branch followed by kissing-balloon angioplasty and provisional side-branch stenting.