ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Intraepithelial mast cells (MC) are increased in Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) and reduced with elimination of dietary antigens. Single food reintroduction can identify triggers of eosinophilia however it remains unknown the extent to which specific foods trigger intraepithelial mastocytosis. We hypothesized that specific foods drive different degrees of MC inflammation. METHODS: We previously reported a prospective pediatric EoE cohort treated with a 4-food elimination diet (4FED) with removal of soy, egg, wheat, milk. We retrieved unstained slides in which baseline, 4FED, and post-4FED diet reintroduction time points were available. Slides were stained with tryptase, and intraepithelial MCs were counted. Comparisons were made by stratifying patients by eosinophilia, basal cell hyperplasia (BCH), endoscopic abnormalities, and symptoms. Pearson correlation was assessed for MCs with eosinophilic, endoscopic and BCH severity, symptoms, and a novel mucosal activity score (MAS) combining endoscopic and histologic structural severity. RESULTS: Slides were available from 37 patients with at least 1 food reintroduced. MCs were significantly reduced with 4FED. Wheat led to increased intraepithelial MCs in the upper esophagus and with food-induced eosinophilia, while milk led to significantly increased MCs in the upper and lower esophagus and was significantly associated with patients with food-triggered eosinophilia, endoscopic abnormalities, BCH, and symptoms. MCs best correlated with the MAS during milk reintroduction. CONCLUSION: In children with EoE, MCs are reduced with 4FED. During milk reintroduction, significant increases in MCs were observed with all metrics of inflammation along with moderate correlation with structural mucosal activity that was not seen with other foods. This suggests milk exerts unique effects either directly or indirectly on MCs in the esophagus in EoE patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) involves a chronic immune-mediated response to dietary antigens. Recent work identifies T-cell clonality in children with EoE, however, it is unknown whether this is true in adults or whether there is a restricted food-specific T-cell repertoire. We sought to confirm T-cell receptor (TCR) clonality in EoE and assess for differences with specific food triggers. METHODS: Bulk TCR sequencing was performed on mRNA isolated from esophageal biopsies obtained from adults and children with EoE (n = 15) who had food triggers confirmed by endoscopic evaluation. Non-EoE adult and pediatric controls (n = 10) were included. Differences in TCR clonality by disease and treatment status were assessed. Shared and similar V-J-CDR3s were assessed based on specific food triggers. RESULTS: Active EoE biopsies from children but not adults displayed decreased unique TCRα/ß clonotypes and increased relative abundance of TCRs comprising >1% of the total compared to non-EoE controls and paired inactive EoE samples. Among patients in which baseline, post diet elimination, and food trigger reintroduction samples (n = 6) were obtained, we observed ~1% of TCRs were shared only between pre-diet elimination and trigger reintroduction. Patients with a shared EoE trigger (milk) had a greater degree of shared and similar TCRs compared to patients with differing triggers (seafood, wheat, egg, soy). CONCLUSION: We confirmed relative clonality in children but not adults with active EoE and identified potential food-specific TCRs, particularly for milk-triggered EoE. Further studies are needed to better identify the broad TCR repertoire relevant to food triggers.
Subject(s)
Eosinophilic Esophagitis , Humans , Child , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/diagnosis , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/genetics , Food/adverse effects , Allergens , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Esophageal dilation improves dysphagia but not inflammation in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) patients. We investigated if dilation modifies the association between symptoms and peak esophageal eosinophils per high-power field (eos/hpf). METHODS: Adults enrolled in a multisite prospective Consortium of Gastrointestinal Eosinophilic Disease Researchers Outcome Measures for Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases Across Ages observational study (NCT02523118) completed the symptom-based EoE activity index (EEsAI) patient-reported outcome instrument and underwent endoscopy with biopsy specimens. Patients were stratified based on dilation status as absent, performed 1 year or less before endoscopy, and performed more than 1 year before endoscopy. Assessments included Spearman correlations of the relationship between symptoms and eos/hpf and linear regression with EEsAI as the outcome, eos/hpf as predictor, and interaction for dilation and eos/hpf. RESULTS: Among 100 patients (n = 61 males; median age, 37 y), 15 and 40 patients underwent dilation 1 year or less and more than 1 year before index endoscopy, respectively. In nondilated patients, the association between eos/hpf and symptoms was moderate (ρ = 0.49; P < .001); for a 10-eos/hpf increase, the predicted EEsAI increased by 2.69 (P = .002). In patients dilated 1 or less and more than 1 year before index endoscopy, this association was abolished (ρ = -0.38; P = .157 for ≤1 y and ρ = 0.02; P = .883 >1 y); for a 10-eos/hpf increase, the predicted EEsAI changed by -1.64 (P = .183) and 0.78 (P = .494), respectively. Dilation modified the association between symptoms and eos/hpf (P = .005 and P = .187 for interaction terms of eos/hpf and dilation 1 or less years before and more than 1 year before index endoscopy, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In nondilated EoE adults, eos/hpf correlate modestly with symptoms; this correlation was no longer appreciated in dilated patients, and the dilation effects lasted longer than 1 year. Dilation status should be considered in studies evaluating EoE treatment and for clinical follow-up evaluation.
Subject(s)
Eosinophilic Esophagitis , Adult , Dilatation , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/drug therapy , Humans , Male , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Esophageal histology is critical for diagnosis and surveillance of disease activity in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). A validated noninvasive biomarker has not been identified. We aimed to determine the utility of blood and urine eosinophil-associated proteins to diagnose EoE and predict esophageal eosinophilia. METHODS: Blood and urine were collected from children undergoing endoscopy with biopsy. Absolute eosinophil count (AEC), plasma eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN), eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), major basic protein-1 (MBP-1), galectin-10 (CLC/GAL-10), Eotaxin-2 and Eotaxin-3, and urine osteopontin (OPN) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) were determined. Differences were assessed between EoE and control, and with treatment response. The capacity to predict EoE diagnosis and esophageal eosinophil counts was assessed. RESULTS: Of 183 specimens were collected from 56 EoE patients and 15 non-EoE controls with symptoms of esophageal dysfunction; 33 EoE patients had paired pre- and post-treatment specimens. Plasma (CLC/GAL-10, ECP, EDN, Eotaxin-3, MBP-1) and urine (OPN) biomarkers were increased in EoE compared to control. A panel comprising CLC/GAL-10, Eotaxin-3, ECP, EDN, MBP-1, and AEC was superior to AEC alone in distinguishing EoE from control. AEC, CLC/GAL-10, ECP, and MBP-1 were significantly decreased in patients with esophageal eosinophil counts <15/hpf in response to treatment. AEC, CLC/GAL-10, ECP, EDN, OPN, and MBP-1 each predicted esophageal eosinophil counts utilizing mixed models controlled for age, gender, treatment, and atopy; AEC combined with MBP-1 best predicted the counts. CONCLUSIONS: We identified novel panels of eosinophil-associated proteins that along with AEC are superior to AEC alone in distinguishing EoE from controls and predicting esophageal eosinophil counts.
Subject(s)
Eosinophilic Esophagitis , Biomarkers , Child , Eosinophil-Derived Neurotoxin/metabolism , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/metabolism , Eosinophils/metabolism , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Mast cells (MCs) are increased in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Endoscopic abnormalities, symptoms, and epithelial changes can persist after treatment despite a reduction of esophageal eosinophilia. It is unknown whether this could be due to persistent MC infiltration. We aimed to determine whether patients with histologically inactive (HI) EoE (defined as <15 eosinophils per high-powered field) with persistent symptoms, endoscopic, or epithelial abnormalities after treatment have increased MCs. METHODS: Secondary analysis of prospective data from 93 children with EoE undergoing post-treatment endoscopy between 2011 and 2015. Thirty-five non-EoE controls were included. Immunohistochemistry for tryptase, an MC marker, was performed on mid and distal esophageal biopsies. Total and degranulated intraepithelial MCs per high-powered field (MC/hpf) were quantified. Symptoms and endoscopic findings were recorded at time of endoscopy. MC/hpf were compared between HI-EoE and control, and among HI-EoE based on endoscopic and histologic findings, and symptoms. Nine clinical remission (CR) patients were identified, with absence of endoscopic abnormalities and symptoms. RESULTS: MC/hpf were increased in HI-EoE compared with control (17 ± 11 vs 8 ± 6, P < 0.0). Patients with persistent endoscopic abnormalities had increased total (20 ± 12 vs 13 ± 10, P = 0.001) and degranulated (8 ± 6 vs 5 ± 4, P = 0.002) MC/hpf, with no difference in eosinophils. MC/hpf predicted furrowing (odds ratio = 1.06, P = 0.01) and rings (odds ratio = 1.05, P = 0.03) after controlling for treatment type, proton-pump inhibitor, eosinophils, and duration of therapy. Patients with persistent basal zone hyperplasia and dilated intercellular spaces had increased MC/hpf. Eosinophils were weakly correlated with MC/hpf in the mid (r = 0.30, P < 0.001) and distal (r = 0.29, P < 0.001) esophagus. Clinical remission patients had lower MC/hpf compared with patients with persistent symptoms and/or endoscopic abnormalities. DISCUSSION: MC density is increased in patients with endoscopic and epithelial abnormalities, as well as a few symptoms, despite resolution of esophageal eosinophilia after treatment. This association warrants further study to ascertain whether MCs play an eosinophil independent role in EoE.
Subject(s)
Eosinophilic Esophagitis/pathology , Eosinophils/pathology , Mast Cells/pathology , Adolescent , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Diet Therapy/methods , Edema/pathology , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/physiopathology , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/therapy , Esophagoscopy , Exudates and Transudates , Female , Humans , MaleSubject(s)
Adrenal Insufficiency , Eosinophilic Esophagitis , Adrenal Cortex Hormones , Child , Fluticasone , Humans , SteroidsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome metrics for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) have been developed and validated but not used in a multicenter pediatric population or systematically aligned with histology. OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand (1) the potential of caregiver report to predict patient self-reported symptoms and (2) the correlation of patient-reported outcome domains with histology. METHODS: Patients with EoE (n = 310) and their parents participating in the Consortium of Gastrointestinal Eosinophilic Disease Researchers (CEGIR) observational clinical trial were queried for baseline patient symptoms and quality of life (QOL) by using the Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Score, version 2 (PEESSv2.0), and the Pediatric QOL EoE module (PedsQL-EoE), and biopsy specimens were analyzed by using the EoE Histology Scoring System. RESULTS: PEESSv2.0 parental and child reports aligned across all domains (r = 0.68-0.73, P < .001). PedsQL-EoE reports correlated between parents and children across ages and multiple domains (r = 0.48-0.79, P < .001). There was a tight correlation between symptoms on PEESSv2.0 and their effects on QOL both on self-report and parental report (P < .001). Self-reported symptoms on PEESSv2.0 (positively) and PedsQL-EoE (inversely) showed a weak correlation with proximal, but not distal, peak eosinophil counts and features and architectural tissue changes on the EoE Histology Scoring System (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Parents of children with EoE aged 3 to 18 years accurately reflected their children's disease symptoms and QOL. Self- and parent-reported symptoms correlate with proximal esophageal histology. Our data suggest that parental report in young children can function as an adequate marker for self-reported symptoms and that self-reported symptoms can reflect changes in tissue histology in the proximal esophagus. These findings should be considered during clinical trials for drug development.
Subject(s)
Eosinophilic Esophagitis/pathology , Parents , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Self Report , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Quality of Life , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The endoscopic reference score (EREFS) is used to determine severity of 5 endoscopic findings: edema, rings, exudates, furrows, and strictures. Little is known about the relationship between EREFSs and histologic markers of disease activity in children with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We aimed to determine whether the EREFS can be used to identify children with EoE and how it changes with treatment. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of consecutive children (ages 2-17 years) undergoing diagnostic or post-treatment endoscopy scored real-time with EREFS from December 2012 through 2016. Findings from 192 diagnostic endoscopies and 229 post-treatment endoscopies were evaluated, from 371 children. Incident EoE cases were diagnosed based on 2011 consensus guidelines. Patients were treated with either elimination diet or topical steroids. Subjects who underwent endoscopy for symptoms of esophageal dysfunction but had normal esophageal findings from histology analysis were used as controls. EREFS and receiver operating characteristic curves were determined for incident EoE cases (n = 77) vs controls (n = 115), patients with active EoE (n = 101) vs inactive EoE after treatment (n = 128), and paired pre- and post-treatment cases of EoE (n = 85). Component and composite scores were correlated with eosinophilia. RESULTS: Visual detection of more than 1 esophageal abnormality during the diagnostic endoscopy identified children with EoE with 89.6% sensitivity and 87.9% specificity. EREFS correlated with peak level of eosinophilia (P < .001) at all esophageal levels. Children who responded to therapy had mean EREFSs of 0.5 compared to 2.4 in non-responders. In comparing pre-treatment vs post-treatment data from 85 patients, we found a significant reduction in the composite EREFS (from 2.4 to 0.7) (P < .001) among patients who responded to treatment; 92% of responders had a reduced EREFSs after treatment. EREFSs identified children with EoE with an area under the curve value (AUC) of 0.93. EREFSs identified children with active EoE following treatment with an AUC of 0.81 before treatment and an AUC of 0.79 after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective study of children undergoing diagnostic or post-treatment endoscopy, we found the EREFS to accurately identify those with EoE. Children who responded to therapy had lower EREFS scores than non-responders. EREFSs can be used to measure outcomes of pediatric patients, in conjunction with histology findings, and assess treatments for children with EoE.
Subject(s)
Endoscopy/methods , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/diagnosis , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/pathology , Severity of Illness Index , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/therapy , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: A 6-food elimination diet induces remission in most children and adults with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The effectiveness of empiric elimination of only 4 foods has not been studied in children. We performed a prospective observational outcome study in children with EoE treated with dietary exclusion of cow's milk, wheat, egg, and soy. The objective was to assess the clinical, endoscopic, and histologic efficacy of this treatment in EoE. METHODS: We recruited children (1-18 years old, diagnosed per consensus guidelines) from 4 medical centers. Study participants (n = 78) were given a proton pump inhibitor twice daily and underwent a baseline esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Subjects were instructed on dietary exclusion of cow's milk, wheat, egg, and soy. Clinical, endoscopic, and histologic assessments were made after 8 weeks. Responders had single foods reintroduced for 8 weeks, with repeat endoscopy to assess for recurrence of active disease. The primary endpoint was histologic remission (fewer than 15 eosinophils per high-powered field). Secondary endpoints included symptom and endoscopic improvements and identification of foods associated with active histologic disease. RESULTS: After 8 weeks on 4-food elimination diet, 50 subjects were in histologic remission (64%). The subjects' mean baseline clinical symptoms score was 4.5, which decreased to 2.3 after 8 weeks of 4-food elimination diet (P < .001). The mean endoscopic baseline score was 2.1, which decreased to 1.3 (P < .001). After food reintroduction, the most common food triggers that induced histologic inflammation were cow's milk (85%), egg (35%), wheat (33%), and soy (19%). One food trigger that induced recurrence of esophageal inflammation was identified in 62% of patients and cow's milk-induced EoE was present in 88% of these patients. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective study of children with EoE, 8 weeks of 4-food elimination diet induced clinical, endoscopic, and histologic remission in more than 60% of children with EoE. Although less restrictive than 6-food elimination diet, 4-food elimination diet was nearly as effective, and can be recommended as a treatment for children with EoE.
Subject(s)
Diet Therapy/methods , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/therapy , Adolescent , Animals , Biopsy , Child , Child, Preschool , Endoscopy, Digestive System , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/pathology , Female , Histocytochemistry , Humans , Infant , Male , Prospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine abdominal radiograph use and frequency of digital rectal examinations in children presenting to the emergency department (ED) with abdominal pain and suspected constipation and to determine the impact of an educational module on their use. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of patients evaluated at a pediatric ED because of the complaint of abdominal pain who had the discharge diagnosis of constipation over two 2-month periods, one before and one after an educational module. RESULTS: Comparing pre- and posteducational module periods, there was a significant decrease in abdominal radiograph utilization (69.5% vs 26.4%, respectively, P ≤ .001) and significant increase in performance of digital rectal examination (22.9% vs 47.3%, respectively, P ≤ .001). We demonstrated a 33.6% reduction in abdominal radiograph in children who had a digital rectal examination as part of their examination. Overall, we demonstrated a 43.1% decrease in patients receiving an abdominal radiograph. When time and costs of an abdominal radiograph are considered, this results in significant cost savings. CONCLUSIONS: An educational module reviewing the established criteria for the diagnosis of constipation and presented to ED providers results in increased use of digital rectal examination and decreased use of abdominal radiograph in patients evaluated for abdominal pain and ultimately diagnosed with constipation. The change also was associated with reduction in cost and time and radiation exposure in the ED for these patients.
Subject(s)
Constipation/diagnosis , Digital Rectal Examination/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital , Inservice Training , Radiography, Abdominal/statistics & numerical data , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Adolescent , Chicago , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost Savings , Female , Humans , Male , Medical Staff/education , Nurse Practitioners/education , Retrospective StudiesSubject(s)
Arthralgia/diagnosis , Cardiomyopathy, Dilated/diagnosis , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Myocarditis/diagnosis , Child, Preschool , Diagnosis, Differential , Eosinophilia/complications , Eosinophilia/parasitology , Female , Heart Diseases/complications , Hip Joint , Humans , Hypereosinophilic Syndrome/diagnosis , Rheumatic Diseases/diagnosis , Thrombosis/complicationsSubject(s)
Awards and Prizes , Foundations , Nutritional Sciences , Research Personnel , Research , Female , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Cow's-milk protein is one of the food antigens responsible for causing eosinophilic esophageal inflammation in a majority of children. We describe our experience with treating eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in children by eliminating only cow's milk from their diets. METHODS: This retrospective study assessed the short-term clinical and histological response to eliminating cow's-milk protein from the diet of children with EoE. Only patients undergoing a subsequent upper endoscopy to assess their histological response were included in this analysis. RESULTS: We identified 17 (12 boys and 5 girls) children with EoE who excluded only cow's milk from their diet. Remission was induced in 11 of 17 (65%) patients; within the remission group, 7 (41%) achieved complete histological remission and 4 patients (24%) were in significant histological remission. The mean peak pre- and posttreatment counts for those in remission were 76â±â40 and 2â±â4 (Pâ<â0.01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Elimination of cow's milk-induced clinical and histological remission in 65% (95% confidence interval 42%-88%) of children with EoE in whom it was attempted. This approach offers distinct advantages over other dietary treatment approaches for the initial management of children with EoE. The role of eliminating cow's milk alone for the treatment of EoE warrants further prospective study.
Subject(s)
Eosinophilic Esophagitis/diet therapy , Eosinophils/metabolism , Esophagus/pathology , Milk Hypersensitivity/diet therapy , Milk/immunology , Adolescent , Animals , Cattle , Child , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/etiology , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/immunology , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/pathology , Esophagoscopy , Esophagus/immunology , Female , Humans , Inflammation/etiology , Inflammation/immunology , Inflammation/prevention & control , Leukocyte Count , Male , Milk Hypersensitivity/complications , Milk Hypersensitivity/immunology , Milk Hypersensitivity/pathology , Milk Proteins/immunology , Remission Induction , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a clinicopathologic condition of increasing recognition and prevalence. In 2007, a consensus recommendation provided clinical and histopathologic guidance for the diagnosis and treatment of EoE; however, only a minority of physicians use the 2007 guidelines, which require fulfillment of both histologic and clinical features. Since 2007, the number of EoE publications has doubled, providing new disease insight. Accordingly, a panel of 33 physicians with expertise in pediatric and adult allergy/immunology, gastroenterology, and pathology conducted a systematic review of the EoE literature (since September 2006) using electronic databases. Based on the literature review and expertise of the panel, information and recommendations were provided in each of the following areas of EoE: diagnostics, genetics, allergy testing, therapeutics, and disease complications. Because accumulating animal and human data have provided evidence that EoE appears to be an antigen-driven immunologic process that involves multiple pathogenic pathways, a new conceptual definition is proposed highlighting that EoE represents a chronic, immune/antigen-mediated disease characterized clinically by symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction and histologically by eosinophil-predominant inflammation. The diagnostic guidelines continue to define EoE as an isolated chronic disorder of the esophagus diagnosed by the need of both clinical and pathologic features. Patients commonly have high rates of concurrent allergic diatheses, especially food sensitization, compared with the general population. Proved therapeutic options include chronic dietary elimination, topical corticosteroids, and esophageal dilation. Important additions since 2007 include genetic underpinnings that implicate EoE susceptibility caused by polymorphisms in the thymic stromal lymphopoietin protein gene and the description of a new potential disease phenotype, proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophila. Further advances and controversies regarding diagnostic methods, surrogate disease markers, allergy testing, and treatment approaches are discussed.
Subject(s)
Eosinophilic Esophagitis/diagnosis , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/immunology , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/therapy , Adult , Child , Consensus Development Conferences as Topic , Guidelines as Topic , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the distribution of mast cells and dendritic cell (DC) subsets in paired muscle and skin (lesional/nonlesional) from untreated children with juvenile dermatomyositis (DM). METHODS: Muscle and skin biopsy samples (4 skin biopsy samples with active rash) from 7 patients with probable/definite juvenile DM were compared with muscle and skin samples from 10 healthy pediatric controls. Mast cell distribution and number were assessed by toluidine blue staining and analyzed by Student's t-test. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed to identify mature DCs, myeloid DCs (MDCs), and plasmacytoid DCs (PDCs) by using antibodies against DC-LAMP, blood dendritic cell antigen 1 (BDCA-1), and BDCA-2, respectively. Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) staining indicated active type I interferon (IFN) signaling; positive staining was scored semiquantitatively and analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Both inflamed and nonlesional skin from patients with juvenile DM contained more mast cells than did skin from pediatric controls (P = 0.029), and comparable numbers of mast cells were present in lesional and nonlesional skin. Interestingly, mast cell numbers were greater in skin than in paired muscle tissue from patients with juvenile DM (P = 0.014) and were not increased in muscle from patients with juvenile DM compared with control muscle. Both muscle and skin from patients with juvenile DM showed more mature PDCs and MxA staining than did their corresponding control tissues (P < 0.05). In both muscle and skin from patients with juvenile DM and in pediatric control muscle, there were fewer MDCs than PDCs, and the distributions of MDCs and PDCs were similar in pediatric control skin samples. CONCLUSION: The identification of mast cells in skin (irrespective of rash) from patients with juvenile DM, but not in paired muscle tissue, suggests that they have a specific role in juvenile DM skin pathophysiology. In skin from patients with juvenile DM, increased numbers of PDCs and increased expression of type I IFN-induced protein suggest a selective influence on T cell differentiation and subsequent effector function.
Subject(s)
Dendritic Cells/pathology , Dermatomyositis/pathology , Mast Cells/pathology , Muscle, Skeletal/pathology , Skin/pathology , Biomarkers/metabolism , Biopsy , Child, Preschool , Dendritic Cells/metabolism , Dermatomyositis/metabolism , Dermatomyositis/physiopathology , Female , GTP-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Humans , Interferon Type I/metabolism , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Mast Cells/metabolism , Muscle, Skeletal/metabolism , Myxovirus Resistance Proteins , Polymorphism, Genetic , Severity of Illness Index , Signal Transduction , Skin/metabolism , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/geneticsABSTRACT
Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are common and clinically heterogeneous neurodevelopmental disorders. Gastrointestinal disorders and associated symptoms are commonly reported in individuals with ASDs, but key issues such as the prevalence and best treatment of these conditions are incompletely understood. A central difficulty in recognizing and characterizing gastrointestinal dysfunction with ASDs is the communication difficulties experienced by many affected individuals. A multidisciplinary panel reviewed the medical literature with the aim of generating evidence-based recommendations for diagnostic evaluation and management of gastrointestinal problems in this patient population. The panel concluded that evidence-based recommendations are not yet available. The consensus expert opinion of the panel was that individuals with ASDs deserve the same thoroughness and standard of care in the diagnostic workup and treatment of gastrointestinal concerns as should occur for patients without ASDs. Care providers should be aware that problem behavior in patients with ASDs may be the primary or sole symptom of the underlying medical condition, including some gastrointestinal disorders. For these patients, integration of behavioral and medical care may be most beneficial. Priorities for future research are identified to advance our understanding and management of gastrointestinal disorders in persons with ASDs.
Subject(s)
Child Development Disorders, Pervasive/complications , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Diseases/therapy , Caseins/administration & dosage , Child , Child Behavior Disorders/complications , Child Behavior Disorders/etiology , Child Development Disorders, Pervasive/immunology , Child Nutrition Disorders/diagnosis , Child Nutrition Disorders/etiology , Databases, Genetic , Diagnostic Techniques, Digestive System , Diet, Gluten-Free , Diet, Protein-Restricted , Food Hypersensitivity/complications , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Diseases/complications , Gastrointestinal Diseases/immunology , Gastrointestinal Tract/physiology , Genetic Testing , Health Education , Health Personnel/education , Humans , Intestines/microbiology , Medical History Taking , Nutrition Assessment , Patient Care Team , Permeability , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Radiography, AbdominalABSTRACT
Children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) can benefit from adaptation of general pediatric guidelines for the diagnostic evaluation of abdominal pain, chronic constipation, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. These guidelines help health care providers determine when gastrointestinal symptoms are self-limited and when evaluation beyond a thorough medical history and physical examination should be considered. Children with ASDs who have gastrointestinal disorders may present with behavioral manifestations. Diagnostic and treatment recommendations for the general pediatric population are useful to consider until the development of evidence-based guidelines specifically for patients with ASDs.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Child Development Disorders, Pervasive/complications , Constipation/diagnosis , Constipation/therapy , Diarrhea/therapy , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Algorithms , Child , Chronic Disease , Diagnosis, Differential , Diarrhea/etiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/therapy , Humans , Mitochondrial Diseases/complications , Mitochondrial Diseases/diagnosis , Physical ExaminationABSTRACT
The goal of this study is to evaluate the contribution of mast cells to Helicobacter pylori immunity in a model of vaccine-induced protection. Mast cell-deficient Kitl(Sl)/Kitl(Sl-d) and control mice were immunized with H. pylori sonicate plus cholera toxin and challenged with H. pylori, and the bacterial loads, inflammatory infiltrates, and cytokine responses were evaluated and compared at 1, 2, and 4 weeks postchallenge. In vitro stimulation assays were performed using bone marrow-derived mast cells, and recall assays were performed with spleen cells of immunized mast cell-deficient and wild-type mice. Bacterial clearance was observed by 2 weeks postchallenge in mast cell-deficient mice. The bacterial load was reduced by 4.0 log CFU in wild-type mice and by 1.5 log CFU in mast cell-deficient mice. Neutrophil numbers in the gastric mucosa of immune Kitl(Sl)/Kitl(Sl-d) mice were lower than those for immune wild-type mice (P < 0.05). Levels of gastric interleukin-17 (IL-17) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) were also significantly lower in immune Kitl(Sl)/Kitl(Sl-d) mice than in wild-type mice (P < 0.001). Immunized mast cell-deficient and wild-type mouse spleen cells produced IFN-gamma and IL-17 in response to H. pylori antigen stimulation. TNF-alpha and CXC chemokines were detected in mast cell supernatants after 24 h of stimulation with H. pylori antigen. The results indicate that mast cells are not essential for but do contribute to vaccine-induced immunity and that mast cells contribute to neutrophil recruitment and inflammation in response to H. pylori.