The Effect of Staged Versus Usual Care Physiotherapy on Knee Function Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: The long duration and high cost of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) rehabilitation can pose barriers to completing rehabilitation, the latter stages of which progress to demanding sport-specific exercises critical for a safe return to sport. A staged approach shifting in-person physiotherapy sessions to later months of recovery may ensure patients undergo the sport-specific portion of ACLR rehabilitation. Design/Objective: To compare postoperative outcomes of knee function in patients participating in a staged ACLR physiotherapy program to patients participating in usual care physiotherapy through a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: One hundred sixty-two patients were randomized to participate in staged (n = 80) or usual care physiotherapy (n = 82) following ACLR and assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. The staged group completed the ACLR rehabilitation protocol at home for the first 3 months, followed by usual care in-person sessions. The usual care group completed in-person sessions for their entire rehabilitation. Outcome measures included the Lower Extremity Functional Scale, International Knee Documentation Committee Questionnaire, pain, range of motion, strength, and hop testing. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant between-group differences in measures of knee function at 6 months postoperative. Patients in the usual care group reported significantly higher International Knee Documentation Committee scores at 3 months postoperative (mean difference = 5.8; 95% confidence interval,  1.3 to 10.4; P = .01). CONCLUSION: A staged approach to ACLR rehabilitation does not appear to impede knee function at 6 months postoperative but may result in worse patient reported outcomes at early follow-ups.

Development of a Clinician-Rated Drop Vertical Jump Scale for Patients Undergoing Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Delphi Approach.

Study Design Delphi panel study. Background Biomechanical parameters measured during a drop vertical jump task are risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and are targeted during rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction. A clinically feasible tool that quantifies observed performance on the drop vertical jump would help inform treatment efforts. The content and scoring of such a tool should be deliberated on by a group of experts throughout its development. Objectives To establish consensus on the content and scoring of a clinician-rated drop vertical jump scale (DVJS) for use during rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction. Methods Using a modified Delphi process, a panel of experts (researchers and clinicians) on the risk factors, prevention, treatment, and biomechanics of ACL injury anonymously critiqued versions of a DVJS. The DVJS was developed iteratively, based on the feedback from the panel, using Likert scale responses to questions and providing written comments. Three to 5 rounds were planned a priori, with a requirement of 75% agreement on included items after the final round. Results Twenty of the 31 invited experts (65%) participated. Approximately 93% agreement was achieved after the fourth round. Final items on the scale included the rating of knee valgus collapse (no collapse to extreme collapse) and the presence of other undesirable movements, including lateral trunk lean, insufficient knee flexion, and limb-to-limb asymmetry. Conclusion The Delphi process resulted in a beta version of a DVJS. Expert consensus was achieved on its content and scoring to support further clinical testing of the scale. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(8):557-564. Epub 6 Jul 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7183.

Longitudinal changes in the lower extremity functional scale after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructive surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the pattern of change in lower extremity physical function status as measured by the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) during the first 16 weeks after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery and illustrate how this information can be applied in clinical practice to assist with goal setting and the evaluation of patient outcomes. The secondary objective is to estimate the test-retest reliability of the LEFS in this population. DESIGN: Prospective cohort, observational. SETTING: Physiotherapy private practice. PATIENTS: Forty-seven participants underwent ACL reconstructive surgery and were initially recruited. Two participants were excluded from the analysis, resulting in 45 participants (28 men, mean age 29.4 years; 17 women, mean age 29.0 years). INTERVENTIONS: Participants underwent a rehabilitation protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants completed the LEFS at each visit from their initial physiotherapy session to 16 weeks postsurgery. A nonlinear model of change was developed, which related LEFS scores to weeks postsurgery. Test-retest reliability was examined between the seventh and ninth weeks using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,1) and standard error of measurement (SEM). RESULTS: The nonlinear model demonstrated rapid improvements in LEFS scores within the first 7 to 8 weeks with a gradual tapering of this improvement. At 16 weeks, the predicted LEFS score was 63 out of a maximum score of 80. The LEFS demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability in this population (ICC2,1 = 0.90, SEM = 3.7). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a description of postsurgical change in functional status for patients after ACL reconstructive surgery that can assist clinicians in developing clinical goals. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A rapid improvement in lower extremity physical function is demonstrated in the first 7 to 8 weeks after ACL reconstructive surgery with a tapering of this improvement after 8 weeks.

Reliability of palpation of humeral head position in asymptomatic shoulders.

The purpose of this study was to determine if, within a normal population: (1) palpation of the humeral head, relative to the acromion, in three static positions, was a reliable technique (2) there was a difference in humeral head position between the dominant and non-dominant shoulders in the three positions (3) there was a difference in humeral head position relative to the acromion between the arm at side (AS), the 90 degrees abduction/external rotation (AER) and 90 degrees abduction/internal rotation (AIR) positions. This test-retest study recorded palpation landmarks using a standardized protocol. Intra-tester reliability was above 0.8 for both AS and AER and all other ICCs were below 0.6. There was no systematic difference between dominant and non-dominant sides in any of the three positions (AS P=0.408, AER P=0.448, AIR P=0.233). There was a significant difference in measurements between each position (P<0.001). It can be concluded that, palpation of humeral head position in relation to the acromion is a reliable technique in the AS position. These normative data provide a baseline that can be used for future comparison if differences are found to exist in subgroups with pathological shoulder conditions where larger glenohumeral translations are thought to exist.