The diagnosis of posttransplantation diabetes mellitus: meeting the challenges.

Posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a major complication after renal transplantation due to its negative impact on patient and graft survival, and affects up to 40% of renal transplant recipients. The generation of evidence regarding its optimal treatment is now progressing with some emphasis on early postoperative insulin treatment that targets ß-cell failure. This therapy seems to benefit renal transplant patients but contrasts with previous PTDM guidelines that were following treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM): oral antidiabetics first, insulin last. Similarly, in the current PTDM consensus recommendations, diagnostic procedures are in accordance with the American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommendations for diagnosis of DM. PTDM and type 2 DM, however, are distinct disease entities with different pathophysiological backgrounds. This review will discuss the significance of the standard diagnostic criteria for DM in patients after renal transplantation without prior DM. In particular, the role of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) will be reviewed. In addition, the potential role of other glycated proteins and continuous glucose monitoring will be covered, although these parameters are not yet part of the consensus recommendations.

Post-transplantation diabetes mellitus: evaluation of treatment strategies.

BACKGROUND: Post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a serious complication after kidney transplantation, but evidence regarding long-term outcomes of treatment regimens remains scarce. AIM AND METHODS: The aim of this retrospective cohort analysis was to assess the long-term efficiency and safety of antidiabetic treatments in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), who were diagnosed with PTDM by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). RESULTS: Of 561 KTRs that were screened for PTDM at our outpatient clinic, 71 (13%) had a diabetic OGTT and were included in this study. Mean follow-up was 34.2 ± 16.1 months. Thirty-six PTDM patients (51%) received antidiabetic treatment after diagnosis with either a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, a sulfonylurea, pioglitazone, or insulin. These patients had significantly higher fasting glucose and two-h plasma glucose (2HPG) values at baseline than those who remained without therapy. In contrast to lifestyle modification alone or sulfonylureas, DPP-4 inhibitors improved glycemic control significantly. Adverse events were generally mild and occurred at similar rates in all groups. CONCLUSION: While sulfonylureas failed to improve glycemic control, DPP-4 inhibitors appeared effective and safe for the therapy of PTDM after kidney transplantation.

Efficacy and safety of vildagliptin in new-onset diabetes after kidney transplantation--a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a serious complication after kidney transplantation, but therapeutic strategies remain underexplored. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors selectively foster insulin secretion without inducing hypoglycemia, which might be advantageous in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with NODAT. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial to assess safety and efficacy of the DPP-4 inhibitor vildagliptin. Intraindividual differences in oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-derived 2-h plasma glucose (2HPG) from baseline to 3 months after treatment served as primary endpoint. Among secondary outcomes, we evaluated HbA1c, metabolic and safety parameters, as well as OGTTs at 1 month after drug discontinuation. Of 509 stable KTRs who were screened in our outpatient clinic, 63 (12.4%) had 2HPG ≥ 200 mg/dL, 33 of them were randomized and 32 completed the study. In the vildagliptin group 2HPG and HbA1c were profoundly reduced in comparison to placebo (vildagliptin: 2HPG = 182.7 mg/dL, HbA1c = 6.1%; placebo: 2HPG = 231.2 mg/dL, HbA1c = 6.5%; both p ≤ 0.05), and statistical significance was achieved for the primary endpoint (vildagliptin: 2HPG-difference -73.7 ± 51.3 mg/dL; placebo: -5.7 ± 41.4 mg/dL; p < 0.01). Adverse events were generally mild and occurred at similar rates in both groups. In conclusion, DPP-4 inhibition in KTRs with overt NODAT was safe and efficient, providing a novel treatment alternative for this specific form of diabetes.

CMV late phase-induced mTOR activation is essential for efficient virus replication in polarized human macrophages.

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains one of the most important pathogens following solid-organ transplantation. Mounting evidence indicates that mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors may decrease the incidence of CMV infection in solid-organ recipients. Here we aimed at elucidating the molecular mechanisms of this effect by employing a human CMV (HCMV) infection model in human macrophages, since myeloid cells are the principal in vivo targets of HCMV. We demonstrate a highly divergent host cell permissiveness for HCMV with optimal infection susceptibility in M2 but not M1 polarized macrophages. Employing an ultrahigh purified HCMV stock we observed rapamycin-independent viral entry and induction of IFN-ß transcripts, but no proinflammatory cytokines or mitogen-activated protein kinases and mTOR activation early after infection. However, in the late infection phase, sustained mTOR activation was observed in HCMV-infected cells and was required for efficient viral protein synthesis including the viral late phase proteins pUL-44 and pp65. Accordingly, rapamycin strongly suppressed CMV replication 3 and 5 days postinfection in macrophages. In conclusion, these data indicate that mTOR is essential for virus replication during late phases of the viral cycle in myeloid cells and might explain the potent anti-CMV effects of mTOR inhibitors after organ transplantation.

Dual inhibition of EGFR and mTOR pathways in small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: In this report we investigated the combination of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway inhibition as a possible new therapeutic strategy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). METHODS: EGFR, p-AKT, p-ERK, p-mTOR and p-p70s6K protein expressions were studied by immunohistochemistry in 107 small cell lung carcinomas and correlated with clinicopathological parameters. Cells of SCLC were treated with erlotinib+/-RAD001 and analysed for cell viability, proliferation, autophagy, and pathway regulation. RESULTS: Epidermal growth factor receptor, p-AKT, p-ERK, p-mTOR, and p-p70s6K were expressed in 37, 24, 13, 55 and 91% of the tumour specimens of all SCLC patients, respectively, and were not associated with disease-free or overall survival. The expression of EGFR was lower in neoadjuvant-treated patients (P=0.038); mTOR pathway activation was higher in the early stages of disease (P=0.048). Coexpression of EGFR/p-mTOR/p-p70s6K was observed in 28% of all patients . EGFR immunoreactivity was associated with p-ERK and p-mTOR expression (P=0.02 and P=0.0001); p-mTOR immunoreactivity was associated with p-p70s6K expression (P=0.001). Tumour cells comprised a functional EGFR, no activating mutations in exons 18-21, and resistance to RAD001 monotherapy. We found synergistic effects of erlotinib and RAD001 combination therapy on the molecular level, cell viability, proliferation and autophagy. CONCLUSIONS: The combined inhibition of EGFR/mTOR pathways could be a promising approach to treat SCLC.

FDG uptake is a surrogate marker for defining the optimal biological dose of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus in vivo.

This study aimed to test whether [(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) uptake of tumours measured by positron emission tomography (PET) can be used as surrogate marker to define the optimal biological dose (OBD) of mTOR inhibitors in vivo. Everolimus at 0.05, 0.5, 5 and 15 mg kg(-1) per day was administered to gastric cancer xenograft-bearing mice for 23 days and FDG uptake of tumours was measured using PET from day 1 to day 8. To provide standard comparators for FDG uptake, tumour volume, S6 protein phosphorylation, Ki-67 staining and everolimus blood levels were evaluated. Everolimus blood levels increased in a dose-dependent manner but antitumour activity of everolimus reached a plateau at doses >or=5 mg kg(-1) per day (tumour volume treated vs control (T/C): 51% for 5 mg kg(-1) per day and 57% for 15 mg kg(-1) per day). Correspondingly, doses >or=5 mg kg(-1) per day led to a significant reduction in FDG uptake of tumours. Dose escalation above 5 mg kg(-1) per day did not reduce FDG uptake any further (FDG uptake T/C: 49% for 5 mg kg(-1) per day and 52% for 15 mg kg(-1) per day). Differences in S6 protein phosphorylation and Ki-67 index reflected tumour volume and changes in FDG uptake but did not reach statistical significance. In conclusion, FDG uptake might serve as a surrogate marker for dose finding studies for mTOR inhibitors in (pre)clinical trials.

Late onset Pneumocystis pneumonia in renal transplantation after long-term immunosuppression with belatacept.

Interference with T-cell function increases the risk of infections, especially during the early post-transplant period. Belatacept, a costimulation blocker, is currently being tested in phase III clinical trials. Here we report a renal transplant recipient who received belatacept and developed severe Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) with fatal superinfections 4 years post transplant. Cytomegalovirus infection preceded PCP, which typically occurs in overimmunosuppressed patients, but has not yet been reported under T-cell costimulation blockade in transplant patients. This case illustrates the possibility of excessive immunosuppression even with a lymphocyte-specific regimen.

Suppression of mTOR complex 2-dependent AKT phosphorylation in melanoma cells by combined treatment with rapamycin and LY294002.

BACKGROUND: Inhibition of mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) with rapamycin leads to phosphorylation of AKT in some cancer cells, with unknown biological consequences. The role of this phosphorylation in melanoma is unknown, although preliminary clinical data indicate poor activity of rapalogues in melanoma. OBJECTIVES: We aimed at elucidating the role of AKT phosphorylation after mTORC1 inhibition in melanoma cells. METHODS: Western blotting, apoptosis assays, cell cycle analyses and viability assays were performed to analyse the effects of rapamycin and LY294002 treatment on melanoma cells. For suppression of mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) an siRNA directed against rictor was used. RESULTS: Rapamycin showed limited effects on cell viability but resulted in strong and lasting AKT phosphorylation in melanoma cells. Combined PI3K/mTOR inhibition with LY294002 had pronounced effects on viability but also led to increased AKT phosphorylation after prolonged treatment. In contrast, combination of rapamycin plus LY294002 suppressed AKT phosphorylation. Suppression of AKT phosphorylation did not correlate with decreases in cell viability. Inhibition of mTORC2 led to reduced levels of phosphorylated AKT. CONCLUSIONS: mTORC1 inhibition with rapamycin and with LY294002 can lead to AKT phosphorylation in melanoma cells via mTORC2. Combination of rapamycin and LY294002 suppresses AKT phosphorylation but without significant effect on treatment efficacy.