Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
J Hosp Infect ; 149: 1-13, 2024 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734184

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Standardized efficacy surface tests for disinfectants are performed on pristine surfaces. There is a growing interest in understanding the impact of surface ageing on disinfectant activity, owing for example to the increased usage of ultraviolet (UV) radiation and oxidative chemistries for surface decontamination. This acknowledges that general surface 'wear and tear' following UV radiation and oxidative biocide exposure may impact biocidal product efficacy. METHODS: PVC surfaces were aged through thermal and UV-A radiation (340 nm wavelength) following the use of standard ageing surface protocols to simulate natural surface degradation. Surface roughness, contact angle and scanning electron microscopy were performed to evaluate physical changes in PVC surfaces before and after artificial ageing. The efficacy of five pre-impregnated disinfectant wipes were evaluated using the ASTM E2967-15 on stainless-steel (control) and PVC surfaces (aged and non-aged). RESULTS: The type of formulation and the organism tested remained the most significant factors impacting disinfectant efficacy, compared with surface type. Both thermal ageing and UV-A exposure of PVC surfaces clearly showed signs of surface degradation, notably an increase in surface roughness. Physical changes were observed in the roughness of PVC after artificial ageing. A difference in disinfectant efficacy dependent on aged PVC surfaces was observed for some, but not all formulations. CONCLUSION: We showed that surface type and surface ageing can affect biocidal product efficacy, although in a non-predictable manner. More research is needed in this field to ascertain whether surface types and aged surfaces should be used in standardized efficacy testing.

2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 64(12)2020 11 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32928737

ABSTRACT

There is no standardized protocol to predict the concentration levels of microbicides that are left on surfaces as a result of the use of these products, and there is no standardized method to predict the potential risk that such levels pose to emerging antibacterial resistance. The ability to distinguish between selection and adaption processes for antimicrobial resistance in bacteria and the impact of different concentrations of microbicide exposure have not been fully investigated to date. This study considers the effect of exposure to a low concentration of chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) on selected phenotypes of Escherichia coli and relates the findings to the risk of emerging antimicrobial resistance. A concentration of 0.006 mg/ml CHX is a realistic "during use" exposure concentration measured on surfaces. At this concentration, it was possible for CHX-susceptible bacteria to survive, adapt through metabolic alterations, exhibit a transient decrease in antimicrobial susceptibility, and express stable clinical cross-resistance to front-line antibiotics. Efflux activity was present naturally in tested isolates, and it increased in the presence of 0.00005 mg/ml CHX but ceased with 0.002 mg/ml CHX. Phenotypic microarray assays highlighted a difference in metabolic regulation at 0.00005 mg/ml and 0.002 mg/ml CHX; more changes occurred after growth with the latter concentration. Metabolic phenotype changes were observed for substrates involved with the metabolism of some amino acids, cofactors, and secondary metabolites. It was possible for one isolate to continue transferring ampicillin resistance in the presence of 0.00005 mg/ml CHX, whilst 0.002 mg/ml CHX prevented conjugative transfer. In conclusion, E. coli phenotype responses to CHX exposure are concentration dependent, with realistic residual CHX concentrations resulting in stable clinical cross-resistance to antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Chlorhexidine , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Chlorhexidine/pharmacology , Escherichia coli/genetics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Plasmids/genetics
3.
J Hosp Infect ; 106(3): 465-472, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32810570

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The introduction of antimicrobial surfaces into healthcare environments is believed to impact positively on the rate of healthcare-associated infections by significantly decreasing pathogen presence on surfaces. AIM: To report on a novel efficacy test that uses a dry bacterial inoculum to measure the microbicidal efficacy of antimicrobial surfaces. METHODS: An aerosolized dry inoculum of Staphylococcus aureus or Acinetobacter baumannii was deposited on copper alloy surfaces or a hospital-grade stainless-steel surface. Surviving bacteria were enumerated following incubation of the inoculated surfaces at an environmentally relevant temperature and relative humidity. Damage caused to bacteria by the aerosolization process and by the different surfaces was investigated. FINDINGS: Dry inoculum testing showed a <2-log10 reduction in S. aureus or A. baumannii on the copper alloy surfaces tested after 24 h at 20°C and 40% relative humidity. Potential mechanisms of action included membrane damage, DNA damage and arrested cellular respiration. The aerosolization process caused some damage to bacterial cells. Once this effect was taken into account, the antimicrobial activity of copper surfaces was evident. CONCLUSIONS: Our test provided a realistic deposition of a bacterial inoculum to a surface and, as such, a realistic protocol to assess the efficacy of dry antimicrobial environmental surfaces in vitro.


Subject(s)
Aerosols/pharmacology , Alloys , Bacteria/drug effects , Coated Materials, Biocompatible/standards , Copper/pharmacology , Microbial Viability , Acinetobacter baumannii/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Freeze Drying , Humidity , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Surface Properties , Temperature
4.
J Hosp Infect ; 106(1): 10-19, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32652212

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the wake of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and unprecedented global demand, clinicians are struggling to source adequate access to personal protective equipment. Respirators can be in short supply, though are necessary to protect workers from SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Rapid decontamination and reuse of respirators may provide relief for the strained procurement situation. METHOD: In this study, we investigated the suitability of 70°C dry heat and microwave-generated steam (MGS) for reprocessing of FFP2/N95-type respirators, and Type-II surgical face masks. Staphylococcus aureus was used as a surrogate as it is less susceptible than enveloped viruses to chemical and physical processes. RESULTS: We observed >4 log10 reductions in the viability of dry S. aureus treated by dry heat for 90 min at 70°C and >6 log10 reductions by MGS for 90 s. After 3 reprocessing cycles, neither process was found to negatively impact the bacterial or NaCl filtration efficiency of the respirators that were tested. However, MGS was incompatible with Type-II surgical masks tested, as we confirmed that bacterial filtration capacity was completely lost following reprocessing. MGS was observed to be incompatible with some respirator types due to arcing observed around some types of metal nose clips and by loss of adhesion of clips to the mask. CONCLUSION: Considering the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, we propose a reprocessing personal protective equipment/face mask workflow for use in medical areas.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Decontamination/methods , Equipment Reuse/standards , Hot Temperature , Masks/virology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Respiratory Protective Devices/virology , Steam , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Microwaves , SARS-CoV-2
5.
J Appl Microbiol ; 129(4): 916-925, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32352619

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The aims of this study were to explore the development of bacterial resistance and cross-resistance in four common human pathogens following realistic exposure to antibiotics found in over-the-counter (OTC) sore throat medicines: gramicidin, neomycin, bacitracin and tyrothricin. METHODS AND RESULTS: Bacterial exposure to in-use (concentration in the product before use) and diluted concentration (i.e. during use) of antibiotic where conducted in broth for 24 h or until growth was visible. The changes in bacterial susceptibility profile before and after exposure was determined using standardized ISO microdilution broth. Antibiotic testing was performed according to EUCAST guidelines. We demonstrated that test bacteria were able to survive exposure to the in-use concentrations of some antibiotics used in OTC medicines. Exposure to during use concentrations of bacitracin resulted in stable increase in minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) (>8-fold) in Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii. Exposure to tyrothricin resulted in a stable increase in MIC (2·4-fold) in Klebsiella pneumoniae, and exposure to neomycin resulted in a stable increase MIC (5000-fold higher than the baseline) in Streptococcus pyogenes. Clinical cross-resistance to other antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, fusidic acid, gentamicin, cefpodoxime, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and cefotaxime) was also demonstrated following exposure to bacitracin or tyrothricin. Bacitracin exposure lead to a stable bacterial resistance after 10 passages. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that OTC antibiotic medicines have the potential to drive resistance and cross-resistance in vitro. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Tackling antibiotic resistance is a high worldwide priority. It is widely accepted that the overuse and misuse of antibiotics increase the risk of the development and spread of antibiotic resistance within communities. A number of OTC sore throat products, widely available across the world for topical use in respiratory indications, contain locally delivered antibiotics. Our findings showed that these antibiotics in OTC medicines present a risk for emerging cross-resistance in a number of bacterial respiratory pathogens.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/adverse effects , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/drug effects , Nonprescription Drugs/adverse effects , Pharyngitis/drug therapy , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology , Bacteria/drug effects , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Nonprescription Drugs/pharmacology , Pharyngitis/microbiology
6.
J Hosp Infect ; 103(1): e25-e32, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30273639

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of effective cleaning/disinfectant products is important to control pathogens on healthcare surfaces. With the increasing number of wipe products available, there is a concern that combination of a formulation with the wrong material will decrease the efficacy of the product. This study aimed to use a range of efficacy test protocols to determine the efficacy of four formulations before and after binding to three commonly used wiping materials. METHODS: Two quaternary ammonium (QAC)-based products, one hydrogen-peroxide-based product and one neutral cleaner were combined with microfibre, cotton or non-woven materials and tested for efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus with two surface tests (ASTM E2197-17 and EN13697-15) and two 'product' tests (ASTM E2967-15 and EN16615-15). FINDINGS: Overall, the impact of using different materials on formulation efficacy was limited, except for an alkyl(C12-16)dimethylbenzylammonium chloride-based product used at 0.5% v/v. The hydrogen peroxide product was the most efficacious regardless of the material used. The results from wipe test ASTM E2967-15 were consistent with those from the surface tests, but not with EN16615-15 which was far less stringent. CONCLUSIONS: The use of different wiping cloth materials may not impact severely on the efficacy of potent disinfectants, despite the absorption of different volumes of formulation by the materials. QAC-based formulations may be at higher risk when a low concentration is used. There were large differences in efficacy depending on the standard test performed, highlighting the need for more stringency in choosing the test to make a product claim on label.


Subject(s)
Disinfectants/pharmacology , Disinfection/methods , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Textiles
7.
J Hosp Infect ; 93(3): 256-62, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27133281

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There has been an increase in the availability of commercial sporicidal formulations. Any comparison of sporicidal data from the literature is hampered by the number of different standard tests available and the use of diverse test conditions including bacterial strains and endospore preparation. AIM: To evaluate the effect of sporicidal standard tests on the apparent activity of eight biocides against Clostridium difficile and Bacillus subtilis. METHODS: The activity of eight biocidal formulations including two oxidizing agents, two aldehydes, three didecyldimethylammonium chloride (DDAC) and amine formulations, and sodium hypochlorite were evaluated using four standard sporicidal tests (BS EN 14347, BS EN13704, ASTM E2197-11, and AOAC MB-15-03) against B. subtilis (ACTC 19659) and C. difficile (NCTC 11209) spores. FINDINGS: C. difficile spores were more susceptible to the sporicides than were B. subtilis spores, regardless of the method used. There were differences in sporicidal activity between methods at 5 min but not at 60 min exposure. DDAC and amine-based products were not sporicidal when neutralized appropriately. Neutralization validation was confirmed for these biocides using the reporting format described in the BS EN standard tests, although the raw data appear to indicate that neutralization failed. CONCLUSION: The different methods, whether based on suspension or carrier tests, produced similar sporicidal inactivation data. This study suggests that detailed neutralization validation data should be reported to ensure that neutralization of active spores is effective. Failure to do so may lead to erroneous sporicidal claims.


Subject(s)
Bacillus subtilis/drug effects , Clostridioides difficile/drug effects , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Microbial Viability/drug effects , Spores, Bacterial/drug effects , Bacillus subtilis/physiology , Clostridioides difficile/physiology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/standards , Spores, Bacterial/physiology
8.
J Hosp Infect ; 91(4): 319-25, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26518272

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of disinfectant pre-soaked wipes (DPW) to decontaminate high-touch environmental surfaces (HTES) by wiping is becoming increasingly widespread in the healthcare environment. However, DPW are rarely tested using conditions simulating their field use, and the label claims of environmental surface disinfectants seldom include wiping action. AIM: To evaluate the new E2967-15 standard test specific to wipes, particularly their ability to decontaminate surfaces and to transfer acquired contamination to clean surfaces. METHODS: ASTM Standard E2967-15 was used by three independent laboratories to test the efficacy of five types of commercially available wipe products. All data generated were pulled together, and reproducibility and repeatability of the standard were measured. FINDINGS: All the commercial DPW tested achieved a >4log10 (>99.99%) reduction in colony-forming units (CFU) of Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumanii with 10s of wiping, but only one DPW containing 0.5% accelerated H2O2 prevented the transfer of bacteria to another surface. CONCLUSION: This newly introduced standard method represents a significant advance in assessing DPW for microbial decontamination of HTES, and should greatly assist research and development, and in making more relevant and reliable claims on marketed DPW.


Subject(s)
Colony Count, Microbial , Disinfectants/administration & dosage , Environmental Microbiology , Health Facility Environment , Microbial Viability/drug effects , Acinetobacter/drug effects , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects
9.
J Appl Microbiol ; 119(6): 1541-51, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26434927

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Oxidizing agents such as chlorine dioxide are widely used microbicides, including for disinfection of medical equipment. We isolated a Bacillus subtilis isolate from a washer-disinfector whose vegetative form demonstrated unique resistance to chlorine dioxide (0·03%) and hydrogen peroxide (7·5%). The aim of this study was to understand the mechanisms of resistance expressed by this isolate. METHODS AND RESULTS: A range of resistance mechanisms were investigated in the B. subtilis isolate and a reference B. subtilis strain (ATCC 6051) to include bacterial cell aggregation, the presence of profuse exopolysaccharide (EPS), and the expression of detoxification enzymes. The basis of resistance of the isolate to high concentrations of oxidizing agents was not linked to the presence of endospores. Although, the presence of EPS, aggregation and expression of detoxification enzymes may play a role in bacterial survival to low concentrations of chlorine dioxide, it is unlikely that the mechanisms helped tested to survive the bactericidal effect of higher oxidizer concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the mechanisms conferring resistance to chlorine dioxide and hydrogen peroxide remains elusive. Based on recent advances in the mode of action of oxidizing agents and notably hydrogen peroxide, we postulate that additional efficient intracellular mechanisms may be involved to explain significant resistance to in-use concentrations of commonly used high-level disinfectants. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF STUDY: The isolation of a highly resistant vegetative Gram-positive bacterium to a highly reactive oxidizing agent is worrying. Understanding the mechanisms conferring such resistance is essential to effectively control such bacterial isolates. Here, we postulate that there are still mechanisms of bacterial resistance that have not been fully characterized.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacillus subtilis/drug effects , Bacillus subtilis/isolation & purification , Chlorine Compounds/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Oxidants/pharmacology , Oxides/pharmacology
10.
J Hosp Infect ; 89(1): 2-15, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25477061

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Disinfectants with claimed activity against Clostridium difficile must be evaluated to ensure efficacy against the spores that comprise an environmental source of patient infection. Unfortunately there is, at present, no generally accepted method for evaluating these disinfectants. In the absence of such a method, laboratories have to adapt protocols that were not designed for products used in medical environments and consequently may use inappropriate test organisms, exposure times, and pass criteria. AIM: To develop and evaluate a method for testing the activity of disinfectants against C. difficile spores using exposure times and pass criteria which are relevant to clinical application. METHODS: A Joint Working Party of the Healthcare Infection Society (HIS) and the Advisory Committee on Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infections (ARHAI) of the Department of Health in England was assembled. The Working Party adapted a previously described enzyme-based method for spore purification (the Clospore method) using an exposure time of 5 min and a 5 log10 kill as a pass criterion. FINDINGS: Evaluation of the method by three laboratories demonstrated that the method is simple to follow and that the results are repeatable and reproducible. CONCLUSION: The method described by the Working Party produces a clean suspension with a high titre of spores. It is recommended that, for a disinfectant used in the environment, the product should demonstrate a 5 log10 reduction in 5 min under clean or dirty conditions to fulfil the requirements of the test.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile/drug effects , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Microbial Viability/drug effects , Spores, Bacterial/drug effects , England , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...