Clinical and immunological effects of treatment with murine anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody along with interleukin 2 in patients with cancer.

Anti-CD3 mAb and interleukin 2 (IL-2) were used in a Phase I study to treat 29 patients with cancer. The anti-CD3 was given as an i.v. bolus infusion over 10 min followed by two i.v. 96-h continuous infusions of IL-2 at 3 x 10(6) units/m2/day with a 3-day rest between the IL-2 infusions. Four patients were treated with 6, 18, 60, and 300 microgram/m2 anti-CD3. One patient received 3000 microgram/m2 anti-CD3. This patient developed profound hypotension and the IL-2 infusions were delayed for 2 weeks. Two patients were treated at an intermediate dose of 600 microgram/m2. These patients developed dose-limiting toxicities including hypotension, dyspnea and increased blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and bilirubin. They were unable to complete their first course of therapy. In an effort to achieve a dose of anti-CD3 which would activate T cells in vivo, pentoxifylline was given to blunt the toxicities seen with anti-CD3 thought to be due predominantly to the cytokine syndrome and tumor necrosis factor release. Four patients received p.o. pentoxifylline to cover an anti-CD3 dose of 600 microgram/m2. The IL-2 infusion was initiated 1 week after the mAb. While there was an anti-CD3 dose-dependent increase in serum tumor necrosis factor level 1 h after mAb infusion, pentoxifylline did not reduce the serum tumor necrosis factor level. There was also an anti-CD3 dose-dependent increase in the serum soluble IL-2 receptor levels. Other immune parameters monitored, including in vitro cytotoxic and proliferative responses and lymphocyte count, were similar to treatment courses with IL-2 alone. Fourteen of 26 patients examined developed human anti-murine antibodies following a single dose of anti-CD3. There were no objective antitumor responses. We conclude that in vivo treatment with anti-CD3 did not enhance T cell activity or expansion with subsequent IL-2 infusion and that the combination of anti-CD3 followed by IL-2 did not improve upon the antitumor activity previously seen with IL-2 alone.

Allogeneic T-cell clones able to selectively destroy Philadelphia chromosome-bearing (Ph1+) human leukemia lines can also recognize Ph1- cells from the same patient.

Immunocompetent cells in bone marrow allografts have been associated with a graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. To further characterize effector mechanisms that may be involved in this GVL phenomenon, we have previously established an in vitro model to identify allogeneic T-cell clones that selectively mediate cytotoxicity against a patient's leukemic cells, but not against nonleukemic lymphocytes from the same patient. We have modified this in vitro model to test whether the Ph1 chromosome and the P210 fusion protein it controls have a detectable role in leukemia-specific recognition by allogeneic T-cell clones. In this report, T-cell lines reactive with allogeneic Ph1 chromosome-bearing (Ph1+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cell lines were derived and selected to be minimally reactive with Ph1 negative (Ph1-) lymphoid lines from the same patient. However, after prolonged culture, these same T-cell lines also mediated significant destruction of the Ph1- target cells from the same patients. These T-cell lines specifically recognized cells from the allogeneic CML patient to which they were sensitized, and were not contaminated by an outgrowth of natural killer cells. Furthermore, subclones could be derived from these T-cell lines, and some of these subclones again showed selective killing of the allogeneic Ph1+ leukemia cell lines, and not of the Ph1- cell line from the same patient. Analyses of T-cell receptor (TCR) genes showed the alloreactive T-cell lines and the Ph1+ selective subclones derived from them to be of the same clonal origin. This suggests that the same T cells reacting with antigens expressed on the nonleukemic Ph1- targets can at times selectively and preferentially kill the allogeneic Ph1+ cells. As the same TCR that recognizes Ph1+ cells also can recognize the Ph1- targets, it appears that the Ph1+ chromosome does not play a detectable role in recognition by these allogeneic T-cell clones. This in vitro observation may provide a model for evaluating the relationship between GVL and graft-versus-host disease effects.