Clinical Reasoning, Judgment, and Safe Medication Administration Practices in Senior Nursing Students.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Medication errors occur at alarming rates. Safe medication administration practices require more than observing patient safety rights and psychomotor skills. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships between clinical judgment skills and reasoning processes and safe medication practices in senior nursing students. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional design, 29 students from 3 schools of nursing watched a video simulation of a nurse administering medications in a clinical setting. At predetermined times, reflections on the medication administration practices were journaled. Journals were scored for clinical reasoning processes and clinical judgment using the Clinical Judgment Rubric-Reflective Journal (CJR-RJ) and for medication administration best practices. RESULTS: Students scored low on the CJR-RJ (mean [SD], 5.2 [1.7]). We found a positive relationship between clinical judgment skills and safe medication practices (r = 0.39, t27 = 2.94, P = .018). The clinical reasoning process of Interpreting was a significant indicator of best practices (b = 1.4, t28 = 2.81, P = .010). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that students struggle to connect theory to practice, emphasizing the need to plan experiential learning opportunities for students to develop clinical reasoning, particularly in Interpreting, and judgment skills to prevent medication errors upon entry to practice.

Cultural Perspectives on Pain Assessment and Opioid Use: International Neuroscience Nursing Research Symposium Conference Proceedings.

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: In August of 2020, the 4th International Neuroscience Nursing Research Symposium was held. The purpose of the symposium was to share neuroscience nursing research from around the world. One of the topics thought most notable that stimulated a crucial conversation was how different countries assessed pain and their use of opioids for pain management. BACKGROUND: Neuroscience nurses are global. What is not known is their experience with and what challenges exist with pain management for human beings in their country. Crossing geographic and cultural boundaries, pain affects all human beings. Each culture has unique values and beliefs regarding pain. Patient barriers, pivotal in this article, included poverty, poor health literacy, opioid phobia, and cultural as well as social beliefs. RESULTS: Neuroscience nurses from Australia, Brazil, Germany, Singapore, India, Ghana, Kenya, Philippines, South Africa, and the United States each collaborated to provide a short summary of assessing pain and use of opioids for pain management for the neuroscience patient. CONCLUSION: Neuroscience patients have varying degrees of pain based on many factors. Various countries have religious, spiritual, and cultural traditions that influence the reporting and management of pain. Pain assessment and management can be challenging, especially for the neuroscience nurses around the world.

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Feasibility and Acceptability of a SystemCHANGE Intervention to Improve Medication Adherence in Older Adult Stroke Survivors.

BACKGROUND: Adhering to an antithrombotic medication regimen is essential to reducing recurrent stroke in adult stroke survivors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the SystemCHANGE (SC) and attention control (AC) intervention in older adult, nonadherent ischemic stroke patients. METHODS: A pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted to determine the feasibility and acceptability of an SC versus AC intervention in older adult, nonadherent stroke survivors in the management of antithrombotic medication. Participants were masked to group assignment. Stroke survivors 50 years or older, taking at least 1 once-a-day antithrombotic medication, were recruited from a Midwest Comprehensive Stroke Center-affiliated neurology office. They were screened electronically using the Medication Event Monitoring System for 2 months to determine baseline medication adherence. Nonadherent stroke survivors (medication adherence < 0.97) were randomized to SC or AC intervention and monitored for 3 months. SC focused on redesigning the interpersonal environmental system and daily routines. The AC group was provided education materials on stroke that consisted of stroke risk factor reduction, stroke facts, rehabilitation, and nutrition with the primary investigator. Participation and intervention experience interviews were evaluated for themes. RESULTS: Thirty participants were recruited: median age was 64 years, 46.7% of them were male, and they took an average of 7.77 (SD, 3.191; range, 3-15) prescribed medications. The number of over-the-counter medications taken (excluding aspirin) on a regular basis averaged 1.9 (SD, 0.8; range, 1-4). Two participants were nonadherent and were randomized to the 2 arms. Both participants had positive feedback and were not inconvenienced by their participation in the study. Neither participant voiced concerns about the intervention, survey demands, time requirement, or completing the surveys on the primary investigator's laptop. CONCLUSION: The SC and AC intervention protocols were feasible and acceptable to the participants in this study. Additional pilot testing is needed to further evaluate the intervention and its effect on medication adherence in this population.

Acute Flaccid Myelitis.

Acute flaccid myelitis is a poliolike illness affecting mainly children, which seems to occur every 2 years in the late summer and early fall. The 2018 outbreak was alarming to parents and healthcare providers because the etiology is still under investigation and long-term outcomes are unclear. Becoming familiar with what is known about the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of acute flaccid myelitis enables neuroscience nurses to disseminate accurate information and recognize and report suspicious symptoms.

Improvement of Immunosuppressive Medication Adherence Using a SystemCHANGE Intervention: Case Study of an Older Adult Kidney Transplant Recipient.

This article reports a case study of an older adult kidney transplant recipient with poor medication adherence enrolled in an innovative six-month SystemCHANGE intervention that seeks to systematically improve medication adherence by identifying and shaping routines, involving others in routines, and using medication-taking feedback through small, patient-led experiments. Medication adherence increased immediately and was sustained throughout the intervention and maintenance phases. This is the first case study to demonstrate effectiveness of the SystemCHANGE intervention for promoting medication adherence in a kidney transplant recipient. The intervention improved the timing of doses by linking them to a regularly occurring behavior and providing feedback. The SystemCHANGE intervention represents a systems-thinking approach for both provider and patients, and gives healthcare providers the tools needed to assist patients in using habits and routines, and feedback to improve medication taking and timing.

A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Medication Adherence Interventions in Adult Stroke Survivors.

BACKGROUND: Stroke survivors are at an increased risk for recurrent stroke. Despite recommendations to avoid recurrence from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, medication adherence (MA) in persons with chronic conditions such as stroke is only 50%. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to synthesize randomized controlled trial intervention studies designed to increase MA in adult stroke survivors. SEARCH METHODS: The Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Excerpta Medica database from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2015, were searched. STUDY SELECTION: This study reviewed randomized controlled trials evaluating MA interventions in stroke survivors. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently assessed all full-text articles, and those not meeting the inclusion criteria by both researchers were excluded. RESULTS: This review included 18 studies involving 10 292 participants. Overall, the strength of the included studies was strong. Statistically significant results were reported in 5 of the 18 (28%) studies. Of these, 3 used cognitive/behavioral interventions to increase MA, whereas 2 studies used an educational-based intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some isolated success, most MA interventions in stroke survivors do not show statistically significant improvement. Future MA research must address the lack of consistent use of objective measurement tools and focus on the long-term benefits of MA interventions.