Depressive Symptoms and Sleep Efficiency Sequentially Mediate Racial Differences in Temporal Summation of Mechanical Pain.

BACKGROUND: Racial differences in endogenous pain facilitatory processes have been previously reported. Evidence suggests that psychological and behavioral factors, including depressive symptoms and sleep, can alter endogenous pain facilitatory processes. Whether depressive symptoms and sleep might help explain racial differences in endogenous pain facilitatory processes has yet to be determined. PURPOSE: This observational, microlongitudinal study examined whether depressive symptoms and sleep were sequential mediators of racial differences in endogenous pain facilitatory processes. METHODS: A total of 50 (26 African American and 24 non-Hispanic white) community-dwelling adults without chronic pain (mean 49.04 years; range 21-77) completed the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale prior to seven consecutive nights of sleep monitoring with actigraphy in the home environment. Participants subsequently returned to the laboratory for assessment of endogenous pain facilitation using a mechanical temporal summation protocol. RESULTS: Findings revealed greater depressive symptoms, poorer sleep efficiency, and greater temporal summation of mechanical pain in African Americans compared to non-Hispanic whites. In a sequential mediation model, greater depressive symptoms predicted poorer sleep efficiency (t = -2.55, p = .014), and poorer sleep efficiency predicted enhanced temporal summation of mechanical pain (t = -4.11, p < .001), particularly for African Americans. CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores the importance of examining the contribution of psychological and behavioral factors when addressing racial differences in pain processing. Additionally, it lends support for the deleterious impact of depressive symptoms on sleep efficiency, suggesting that both sequentially mediate racial differences in endogenous pain facilitation.

An Examination of Pain Catastrophizing and Endogenous Pain Modulatory Processes in Adults with Chronic Low Back Pain.

OBJECTIVE: Research on chronic low back pain (cLBP) has focused heavily on structural abnormalities with emphasis on diagnostic imaging. However, for many cLBP patients, clinical pain and disability are not clearly associated with identifiable pathology of the spine or associated tissues. Therefore, alternative determinants such as psychological factors and dysfunctional pain modulatory processes have been suggested to be important. METHODS: This observational study examined differences in pain catastrophizing and endogenous pain modulation between 25 cLBP patients and 25 pain-free controls. Associations among pain catastrophizing, endogenous pain modulatory processes, clinical pain reports, and disability were also examined in cLBP patients. Endogenous pain modulation was examined using temporal summation (TS) of mechanical and heat pain stimuli as well as conditioned pain modulation (CPM) with algometry (test stimulus) and the cold pressor task (conditioning stimulus). RESULTS: Findings demonstrated significantly greater pain catastrophizing as well as greater TS of mechanical and heat pain for cLBP patients compared with controls. CPM was not present in cLBP patients or controls. Among cLBP patients, pain catastrophizing was significantly associated with disability, while TS of mechanical pain was significantly associated with clinical pain severity and disability. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that endogenous pain modulatory processes are altered for cLBP patients, particularly TS of mechanical and heat stimuli. Pain catastrophizing and TS of mechanical pain may have important clinical relevance for cLBP, given associations with clinical pain and disability; however, future research is needed to replicate these findings.