ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Children with pharmacoresistant epilepsy usually receive ketogenic diet (KD) as an inpatient, which makes it an expensive treatment. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness, safety, and costs of outpatient versus inpatient initiated KD. DESIGN: Retrospective observational non-inferiority study. PATIENTS/SETTING: Patients (1-18 years of age) who started KD either inpatient or outpatient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Effectiveness was defined as ≥50% seizure reduction. Safety was measured by the numbers of emergency visits and complications. Economic impact was analyzed by calculating total costs of treatment. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Non-inferiority of outpatient initiation was tested using 95% confidence intervals of the differences in effectiveness and safety endpoints between groups with non-inferiority margins of 10%. Nonparametric bootstrap techniques were used to derive a 95% confidence interval for the mean difference in total costs between the groups. RESULTS: Hundred and five patients started KD in the period 2001 to 2017: 43 inpatient and 62 outpatient. At three months, the KD was effective in 61% of outpatients versus 63% of inpatients. The KD was considered safe in 36% of the outpatients, as compared to 29% in the inpatients. Outpatient initiation was shown to be non-inferior to inpatient initiation in terms of safety. Total health care costs of outpatient initiation were 2901, as compared to 8195 of inpatient initiation per patient (mean difference 5294, 95% CI; - 7653 to - 2935). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that outpatient KD initiation is no worse than inpatient initiation in terms of effectiveness and safety, while carrying lower health care costs.
