Antibiotic Use in Patients With ß-Lactam Allergies and Pneumonia: Impact of an Antibiotic Side Chain-Based Cross-Reactivity Chart Combined With Enhanced Allergy Assessment.

BACKGROUND: ß-lactam antibiotics with dissimilar R-group side chains are associated with low cross-reactivity. Despite this, patients with ß-lactam allergies are often treated with non-ß-lactam alternative antibiotics. An institutional ß-lactam side chain-based cross-reactivity chart was developed and implemented to guide in antibiotic selection for patients with ß-lactam allergies. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective cohort study analyzed the impact of the implementation of the cross-reactivity chart for patients with pneumonia. Study time periods were defined as January 2013 to October 2014 prior to implementation of the chart (historical cohort) and January 2017 to October 2018 (intervention cohort) following implementation. The primary outcome was the incidence of ß-lactam utilization between time periods. Propensity-weighted scoring and interrupted time-series analyses compared outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 341 and 623 patient encounters were included in the historical and intervention cohorts, respectively. There was a significantly greater use of ß-lactams in the intervention cohort (70.4% vs 89.3%; P < .001) and decreased use of alternative therapy (58.1% vs 36%; P < .001). There was no difference in overall allergic reactions between cohorts (2.4% vs 1.6%; P = .738) or in reactions caused by ß-lactams (1.3% vs 0.9%; P = .703). Inpatient mortality increased (0% vs 6.4%; P < .001); however, no deaths were due to allergic reactions. Healthcare facility-onset Clostridioides difficile infections decreased between cohorts (1.2% vs 0.2%; P = .032). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a ß-lactam side chain-based cross-reactivity chart and enhanced allergy assessment was associated with increased use of ß-lactams in patients with pneumonia without increasing allergic reactions.

Perspectives from the frontline: A pharmacy department's response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: The global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has created unprecedented strains on healthcare systems around the world. Challenges surrounding an overwhelming influx of patients with COVID-19 and changes in care dynamics prompt the need for care models and processes that optimize care in this medically complex patient population. The purpose of this report is to describe our institution's strategy to deploy pharmacy resources and standardize pharmacy processes to optimize the management of patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This retrospective, descriptive report characterizes documented pharmacy interventions in the acute care of patients admitted for COVID-19 during the period April 1 to April 15, 2020. Patient monitoring, interprofessional communication, and intervention documentation by pharmacy staff was facilitated through the development of a COVID-19-specific care bundle integrated into the electronic medical record. RESULTS: A total of 1,572 pharmacist interventions were documented in 197 patients who received a total of 15,818 medication days of therapy during the study period. The average number of interventions per patient was 8. The most common interventions were regimen simplification (15.9%), timing and dosing adjustments (15.4%), and antimicrobial therapy and COVID-19 treatment adjustments (15.2%). Patients who were admitted to an intensive care unit care at any point during their hospital stay accounted for 66.7% of all interventions documented. CONCLUSION: A pharmacy department's response to the COVID-19 pandemic was optimized through standardized processes. Pharmacists intervened to address a wide scope of medication-related issues, likely contributing to improved management of COVID-19 patients. Results of our analysis demonstrate the vital role pharmacists play as members of multidisciplinary teams during times of crisis.

Therapeutic drug monitoring and use of an adjusted body weight strategy for high-dose voriconazole therapy.

Objectives: A high-dose 12 mg/kg/day (6 mg/kg twice daily) voriconazole regimen was recommended by the CDC to treat patients injected with contaminated methylprednisolone acetate that caused a multi-state fungal outbreak in 2012-13. Therapeutic drug monitoring results of this unique regimen are unknown, as is the most appropriate dosing weight for obese patients. We evaluated voriconazole trough measurements for this dosing scheme, as well as the use of adjusted body weight dosing for obese patients. Methods: Voriconazole trough levels were analysed in obese (BMI ≥35 kg/m 2 ) and non-obese (BMI <35 kg/m 2 ) patients who were given initial therapy with 12 mg/kg/day. Results: Of 138 patients, the first steady-state voriconazole troughs were supratherapeutic (>5 mg/L) in 65 (47%) patients, therapeutic (2-5 mg/L) in 57 (41%) patients and subtherapeutic (<2 mg/L) in 16 (12%) patients. Twenty-three patients had pre-steady-state dose decreases due to supratherapeutic levels, with subsequent first steady-state troughs in the therapeutic ( n = 17) and subtherapeutic ( n = 6) categories. Voriconazole doses >11 and >8 mg/kg/day produced mainly first steady-state supratherapeutic troughs in 44 obese and 94 non-obese patients, respectively. An initial 12 mg/kg/day was progressively lowered to a median maintenance dose of 8.5 mg/kg/day in the obese and 8.6 mg/kg/day in the non-obese. Conclusions: A high-dose voriconazole regimen produced initial supratherapeutic troughs that required dose adjustment downward by nearly 30%. Adjusted body weight dosing in obese patients resulted in a similar maintenance dose to total body weight dosing in the non-obese, and appears to be a sensible dosing strategy for these patients.