A comparison of ketamine sedation and general anaesthesia for manipulation of paediatric forearm fractures.

The purpose of the study was to compare the use of ketamine sedation and general anaesthesia for manipulation of paediatric wrist and forearm fractures. A retrospective analysis was performed of patients under 16 years treated at our centre between October 2014 and October 2015. Exclusion criteria were open fractures and fractures with complete displacement. Outcomes measured were fracture reduction, the quality of the cast, fracture redisplacement, further surgical intervention and use of theatre time. 66 children were manipulated over the study period; 31 received ketamine sedation and 35 general anaesthesia. No statistically significant difference was found in the rate of re-intervention (p=0.48), quality of reduction (p=0.39), quality of cast (p=0.14 and p=0.21), or redisplacement (p=0.87). Those undergoing general anaesthesia used on average 50 minutes of theatre time and one third required an overnight admission. We conclude that ketamine sedation achieves comparable treatment outcomes to general anaesthesia whilst using fewer resources.

Predicting redisplacement after manipulation of paediatric distal radius fractures: the importance of cast moulding.

INTRODUCTION: The majority of displaced distal radius fractures are managed by closed reduction and cast immobilisation. Redisplacement is associated with initial displacement, imperfect reduction and quality of cast. The aim of this study was to establish which factors predict the risk of redisplacement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis between September 2010 and April 2013 of children who underwent closed manipulation and cast immobilisation for a distal third radius fracture was performed. Open fractures, those treated with fixation, and cases with associated dislocations or physeal injuries were excluded. Initial fracture translation and angulation, the distance from the physis and the presence of an ulna fracture were recorded. Intra-operative radiographs were analysed to assess reduction, the cast index and gap index. Clinic records and post-operative radiographs were reviewed to identify redisplacement or further surgical intervention. RESULTS: During the study period, 107 children underwent closed reduction and casting: 82 boys (76.6 %) and 25 girls (23.4 %), and the mean age of the group was 10 years. Twenty-nine children (27 %) suffered a radiographic redisplacement although only five children underwent a second surgical intervention. Statistically significant risk factors for redisplacement were initial fracture translation (p < 0.001), success of reduction (p < 0.001) and associated ulna fracture (p = 0.021). Both the mean cast index (0.81 vs. 0.78) and mean gap index (0.16 vs. 0.14) were higher in the redisplaced group, but this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Closed reduction and immobilisation of paediatric distal radius fractures is associated with a high redisplacement rate. Initial fracture type and success of reduction are key risk factors.

Displaced paediatric distal radius fractures--when should we use percutaneous wires?

PURPOSE: To establish the intra-operative radiographic parameters that predict the need for percutaneous wire fixation to prevent redisplacement following manipulation for displaced paediatric distal radius fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 105 children, assessing pre-, intra- and post-operative radiographs. Optimal reduction was defined as less than 10% residual translation and less than 5° of angulation on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. Redisplacement was defined as more than 20° angulation or 50% translation on either view. RESULTS: No fracture that was optimally reduced redisplaced. 40% of fractures with suboptimal reduction redisplaced. Initial translation was significantly associated with redisplacement. CONCLUSIONS: If our criteria for optimal reduction are met, closed reduction and casting can be confidently employed. If not, percutaneous wires should be employed to avoid redisplacement, especially in cases with a high grade of initial translation.