ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the quality of investigative interviews in England and Wales since implementation of the Memorandum of Good Practice (MOGP), which specified how forensic interviews of alleged child abuse victims should be conducted. METHOD: Transcripts of 119 videotaped interviews of alleged victims between the ages of 4 and 13 years were obtained from 13 collaborating police forces. Trained raters then classified the types of prompts used by the investigators to elicit substantive information from the children, and tabulated the number of forensically relevant details provided by the children in each response. RESULTS: Like their counterparts in the United States, Israel, and Sweden, forensic interviewers in England and Wales relied heavily on option-posing prompts, seldom using open-ended utterances to elicit information from the children. Nearly 40% of the information obtained was elicited using option-posing and suggestive prompts, which are known to elicit less reliable information than open-ended prompts do. CONCLUSION: Despite the clarity and specificity of the MOGP, its implementation appears to have had less effect on the practices of forensic interviewers in the field than was hoped. Further work should focus on ways of training interviewers to implement the superior practices endorsed by the MOGP and similar professional guidelines.
Subject(s)
Child Abuse, Sexual/diagnosis , Forensic Psychiatry , Guidelines as Topic , Interview, Psychological/standards , Adolescent , Child , Child Welfare , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Psychological Theory , Surveys and QuestionnairesSubject(s)
Child Abuse/statistics & numerical data , Disabled Children/statistics & numerical data , Child , Child Abuse/prevention & control , Communication Barriers , Dependency, Psychological , Disease Susceptibility , Humans , Incidence , Institutionalization , Prevalence , Research Design/standards , Research Design/trends , United Kingdom/epidemiology , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
A study of children's help-seeking behaviour with respect to bullying and parental arguing is reported. A number of specific hypotheses and open-ended questions were investigated with boys and girls aged 8-17 years. Female helpers were preferred overall, though a relationship existed between the child's and helper's gender. Parents, friends, and teachers were all chosen, and parent and peer helpers were seen as complementary rather than competitive sources of help. Reasons for choosing helpers were notably varied, but largely related to perceived qualities of the helper rather than the child's own needs. Children depicted helping as an active response on the part of the helper. These findings are discussed and implications for practice noted.