Muscular Dystrophy Surveillance, Tracking, and Research Network pilot: Population-based surveillance of major muscular dystrophies at four U.S. sites, 2007-2011.

BACKGROUND: For 10 years, the Muscular Dystrophy Surveillance, Tracking, and Research Network (MD STARnet) conducted surveillance for Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy (DBMD). We piloted expanding surveillance to other MDs that vary in severity, onset, and sources of care. METHODS: Our retrospective surveillance included individuals diagnosed with one of nine eligible MDs before or during the study period (January 2007-December 2011), one or more health encounters, and residence in one of four U.S. sites (Arizona, Colorado, Iowa, or western New York) at any time within the study period. We developed case definitions, surveillance protocols, and software applications for medical record abstraction, clinical review, and data pooling. Potential cases were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes 359.0, 359.1, and 359.21 and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes G71.0 and G71.1. Descriptive statistics were compared by MD type. Percentage of MD cases identified by each ICD-9-CM code was calculated. RESULTS: Of 2,862 cases, 32.9% were myotonic, dystrophy 25.8% DBMD, 9.7% facioscapulohumeral MD, and 9.1% limb-girdle MD. Most cases were male (63.6%), non-Hispanic (59.8%), and White (80.2%). About, half of cases were genetically diagnosed in self (39.1%) or family (6.2%). About, half had a family history of MD (48.9%). The hereditary progressive MD code (359.1) was the most common code for identifying eligible cases. The myotonic code (359.21) identified 83.4% of eligible myotonic dystrophy cases (786/943). CONCLUSIONS: MD STARnet is the only multisite, population-based active surveillance system available for MD in the United States. Continuing our expanded surveillance will contribute important epidemiologic and health outcome information about several MDs.

Respiratory Care Received by Individuals With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy From 2000 to 2011.

BACKGROUND: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) causes progressive respiratory muscle weakness and decline in function, which can go undetected without monitoring. DMD respiratory care guidelines recommend scheduled respiratory assessments and use of respiratory assist devices. To determine the extent of adherence to these guidelines, we evaluated respiratory assessments and interventions among males with DMD in the Muscular Dystrophy Surveillance, Tracking, and Research Network (MD STARnet) from 2000 to 2011. METHODS: MD STARnet is a population-based surveillance system that identifies all individuals born during or after 1982 residing in Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Hawaii, Iowa, and western New York with Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy. We analyzed MD STARnet respiratory care data for non-ambulatory adolescent males (12-17 y old) and men (≥18 y old) with DMD, assessing whether: (1) pulmonary function was measured twice yearly; (2) awake and asleep hypoventilation testing was performed at least yearly; (3) home mechanical insufflation-exsufflation, noninvasive ventilation, and tracheostomy/ventilators were prescribed; and (4) pulmonologists provided evaluations. RESULTS: During 2000-2010, no more than 50% of both adolescents and men had their pulmonary function monitored twice yearly in any of the years; 67% or fewer were assessed for awake and sleep hypoventilation yearly. Although the use of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation and noninvasive ventilation is probably increasing, prior use of these devices did not prevent all tracheostomies, and at least 18 of 29 tracheostomies were performed due to acute respiratory illnesses. Fewer than 32% of adolescents and men had pulmonologist evaluations in 2010-2011. CONCLUSIONS: Since the 2004 publication of American Thoracic Society guidelines, there have been few changes in pulmonary clinical practice. Frequencies of respiratory assessments and assist device use among males with DMD were lower than recommended in clinical guidelines. Collaboration of respiratory therapists and pulmonologists with clinicians caring for individuals with DMD should be encouraged to ensure access to the full spectrum of in-patient and out-patient pulmonary interventions.

Delayed diagnosis in duchenne muscular dystrophy: data from the Muscular Dystrophy Surveillance, Tracking, and Research Network (MD STARnet).

OBJECTIVE: To identify key factors for the delay in diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) without known family history. STUDY DESIGN: The cohort comes from the Muscular Dystrophy Surveillance, Tracking, and Research Network (MD STARnet), a multistate, multiple-source, population-based surveillance system that identifies and gathers information on all cases of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy born since 1982. We analyzed medical records of 453 Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy boys to document the time course and steps taken to reach a definitive diagnosis. RESULTS: Among 156 boys without known family history of DMD prior to birth, first signs or symptoms were noted at a mean age of 2.5 years. Concerns resulted in primary care provider evaluation of the child at a mean age of 3.6 years. Mean age at time of initial creatine kinase was 4.7 years. Mean age at definitive diagnosis of DMD was 4.9 years. CONCLUSIONS: There is a delay of about 2.5 years between onset of DMD symptoms and the time of definitive diagnosis, unchanged over the previous 2 decades. This delay results in lost opportunities for timely genetic counseling and initiation of corticosteroid treatment. We recommend checking creatine kinase early in the evaluation of boys with unexplained developmental delay.