Ankle Audiometry: A Clinical Test for the Enhanced Hearing Sensitivity for Body Sounds in Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to develop a clinical test for body sounds' hypersensitivity in superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS). METHOD: Case-control study, 20 patients affected by SCDS and body sounds' hypersensitivity and 20 control matched subjects tested with a new test called ankle audiometry (AA). The AA consisted of a psychoacoustic hearing test in which the stimulus was substituted by a controlled bone vibration at 125, 250, 500, and 750 Hz, delivered at the medial malleolus by a steel spring-attached bone transducer prototype B250. For each subject, it was defined an index side (the other being non-index), the one with major symptoms in cases or best threshold for each tested frequency in controls. In 3 patients, the AA was measured before and after SCDS surgery. RESULTS: The AA thresholds for index side were significantly lower in SCDS patients (115.6 ± 10.5 dB force level [FL]) than in control subjects (126.4 ± 8.56 dB FL). In particular, the largest difference was observed at 250 Hz (-16.5 dB). AA thresholds in patients were significantly lower at index side in comparison with non-index side (124.2 ± 11.4 dB FL). The response obtained with 250 Hz stimuli outperformed the other frequencies, in terms of diagnostic accuracy for SCDS. At specific thresholds' levels (120 dB FL), AA showed relevant sensitivity (90%) and specificity (80%) for SCDS. AA did not significantly correlate to other clinical markers of SCDS such as the bone and air conducted hearing thresholds and the vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. The AA thresholds were significantly modified by surgical intervention, passing from 119.2 ± 9.7 to 130.4 ± 9.4 dB FL in 3 patients, following their relief in body sounds' hypersensitivity. CONCLUSION: AA showed interesting diagnostic features in SCDS with significantly lower hearing thresholds in SCDS patients when compared to healthy matched subjects. Moreover, AA could identify the affected or more affected side in SCDS patients, with a significant threshold elevation after SCDS surgery, corresponding in body sounds' hypersensitivity relief. Clinically, AA may represent a first objective measure of body sounds' hypersensitivity in SCDS and, accordingly, be an accessible screening test for SCDS in not tertiary audiological centers.

Methodological aspects of testing vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in infants at universal hearing screening program.

Motor development in infants is dependent upon the function of the inner ear balance organ (vestibular organ). Vestibular failure causes motor delays in early infancy and suboptimal motor skills later on. A vestibular test for newborns and infants that is applicable on a large scale, safe and cost effective is in demand in various contexts: in the differential diagnosis of early onset hearing loss to determine forms associated with vestibular failure; in early hearing habilitation with cochlear implant, indicating the vestibular predominant side; and in the habilitation of children affected by motor skill disorders, revealing the contribution of a vestibular failure. This work explored the feasibility of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) in conjunction with newborn universal hearing screening program. VEMP was measured after the hearing tests and was evoked by bone-conducted stimuli. Moreover, stimulus delivery was regulated by neck muscle activity, with infants rested unconstrained in their parents´ arms and with the head supported by the operator´s hand. This VEMP protocol showed a high level of feasibility in terms of test viability and result reproducibility. VEMP integrated into the newborn hearing screening program may represent a practical method for large-scale assessment of balance function in infants.

Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials to vertex low frequency vibration as a diagnostic test for superior canal dehiscence.

OBJECTIVE: To explore ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMP) to low-frequency vertex vibration (125 Hz) as a diagnostic test for superior canal dehiscence (SCD) syndrome. METHODS: The oVEMP using 125 Hz single cycle bone-conducted vertex vibration were tested in 15 patients with unilateral superior canal dehiscence (SCD) syndrome, 15 healthy controls and in 20 patients with unilateral vestibular loss due to vestibular neuritis. Amplitude, amplitude asymmetry ratio, latency and interaural latency difference were parameters of interest. RESULTS: The oVEMP amplitude was significantly larger in SCD patients when affected sides (53 µVolts) were compared to non-affected (17.2 µVolts) or compared to healthy controls (13.6 µVolts). Amplitude larger than 33.8 µVolts separates effectively the SCD ears from the healthy ones with sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 93%. The other three parameters showed an overlap between affected SCD ears and non-affected as well as between SCD ears and those in the two control groups. CONCLUSIONS: oVEMP amplitude distinguishes SCD ears from healthy ones using low-frequency vibration stimuli at vertex. SIGNIFICANCE: Amplitude analysis of oVEMP evoked by low-frequency vertex bone vibration stimulation is an additional indicator of SCD syndrome and might serve for diagnosing SCD patients with coexistent conductive middle ear problems.

Changes in cochlear function related to acoustic stimulation of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential stimulation.

Evaluation of cervical evoked myogenic potentials (c-VEMP) is commonly applied in clinical investigations of patients with suspected neurotological symptoms. Short intense acoustic stimulation of peak levels close to 130 dB SPL is required to elicit the responses. A recent publication on bilateral significant sensorineural hearing loss related to extensive VEMP stimulation motivates evaluations of immediate effects on hearing acuity related to the intense acoustic stimulation required to elicit c-VEMP responses. The aim of the current study was to investigate changes in DPOAE-levels and hearing thresholds in relation to c-VEMP testing in humans. More specifically, the current focus is on immediate changes in hearing thresholds and changes in DPOAE-levels at frequencies 0.5 octaves above the acoustic stimulation when applying shorter tone bursts than previously used. Hearing acuity before and immediately after exposure to c-VEMP stimulation was examined in 24 patients with normal hearing referred for neurotologic testing. The stimulation consisted of 192 tonebursts of 6 ms and was presented at 500 Hz and 130 dB peSPL. Békésy thresholds at 0.125-8 kHz and DPOAE I/O growth functions with stimulation at 0.75 and 3 kHz were used to assess c-VEMP related changes in hearing status. No significant deterioration in Békésy thresholds was detected. Significant reduction in DPOAE levels at 0.75 (0.5-1.35 dB) and 3 kHz (1.6-2.1 dB) was observed after c-VEMP stimulation without concomitant changes in cochlear compression. The results indicated that there was no immediate audiometric loss related to c-VEMP stimulation in the current group of patients. The significant reduction of DPOAE levels at a wider frequency range than previously described after the c-VEMP test could be related to the stimulation with shorter tone bursts. The results show that c-VEMP stimulation causes reduction in DPOAE-levels at several frequencies that corresponds to half the reductions in DPOAE levels reported after exposure to the maximally allowed occupational noise for an 8 h working day. Consequently, extended stimuli intensity or stimulation repetition with c-VEMP testing should be avoided to reduce the risk for noise-induced cochlear injury.

Enhanced Auditory Sensitivity to Body Vibrations in Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome.

A key feature of superior canal dehiscence (SCD) syndrome is supranormal hearing of body sounds. The aim of the present study was to quantify this phenomenon and to ascertain whether auditory sensitivity to body vibrations can distinguish SCD patients. Hearing thresholds in response to vibration at the vertex, at the spinous process of the 7th cervical vertebra, and at the medial malleolus were tested in 10 SCD patients and 10 controls. Both patients and controls had insert earphones in both ears. The insert in the test ear was blocked while masking was presented to the other ear. Vibration in the frequency range of 125-1,000 Hz was presented to each of the 3 stimulation sites. The SCD patients were found to have significantly lower hearing thresholds compared with controls. The two study groups reacted differently with respect to frequency. The SCD patients showed an enhanced sensitivity for the lower stimulus frequencies. The difference was, however, rather independent of stimulus presentation site. The findings suggest that hearing thresholds in response to low-frequency body vibration at sites distant from the ears can distinguish SCD patients. The present findings may also support the idea that auditory sensation to body vibrations is a response related to soft tissue conduction.

Mastoid and vertex low-frequency vibration-induced oVEMP in relation to medially directed acceleration of the labyrinth.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the stimulus site and stimulus configuration dependency for bone-conducted low-frequency vibration-induced ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs). METHODS: oVEMPs were tested in response to 125 Hz single cycle bone-conducted vibration in healthy subjects (n=12) and in patients with severe unilateral vestibular lesions (n=10). The stimulus sites were the mastoids and vertex. Both directions of initial stimulus motion were used. RESULTS: At mastoid stimulation, the oVEMP to initial laterally directed acceleration of the labyrinth was delayed approximately the length of time of a stimulus half-cycle, as compared with the response to initial medially directed acceleration. At vertex stimulation, the oVEMP to positive initial acceleration was similar to the oVEMP to mastoid stimulation causing lateral initial acceleration. Likewise, the oVEMP to vertex negative initial acceleration was similar to mastoid stimulation causing initial medial acceleration. Further, patients with unilateral vestibular loss had, compared to healthy subjects, similar oVEMP from the healthy labyrinth. CONCLUSIONS: A fundamental dependency on medially directed accelerations of the labyrinth, based on the latency differences revealed, may theoretically account for oVEMP in response to low-frequency stimulation. SIGNIFICANCE: Low-frequency bone vibration stimulation at vertex might serve for simultaneous oVEMP testing of both ears.

Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: skull taps can cause a stimulus direction dependent double-peak.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the mechanisms for skull tap induced ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMP). METHODS: An electro-mechanical "skull tapper" was used to test oVEMP in response to four different stimulus sites (forehead, occiput and above each ear) in healthy subjects (n=20) and in patients with unilateral loss of vestibular function (n=10). RESULTS: In normals, the oVEMP in response to forehead taps and the contra-lateral oVEMP to taps above the ears were similar. These responses had typical oVEMP features, i.e. a short-latency negative peak (n10) followed by a positive peak (p15). In contrast, the ipsi-lateral oVEMP to the laterally directed skull taps, as well as the oVEMP to occiput taps, had an initial double negative peak (n10+n10b). In patients with unilateral loss of vestibular function, the crossed responses from the functioning labyrinth were very similar to the corresponding oVEMP in normals. CONCLUSIONS: The present data support a theory that skull tapping may cause both a response that is more stimulus direction dependent and one that is less so. SIGNIFICANCE: Whereas the stimulus direction dependent occurrence of the negative double-peak might reveal the functional status of one part of the labyrinth, the rather stimulus direction-independent response might reveal the functional status of other parts.

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in response to lateral skull taps are dependent on two different mechanisms.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the mechanisms for skull tap induced vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP). METHODS: The muscular responses were recorded over both sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscles using skin electrodes. A skull tapper which provided a constant stimulus intensity was used to test cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) in response to lateral skull taps in healthy subjects (n=10) and in patients with severe unilateral loss of vestibular function (n=10). RESULTS: Skull taps applied approximately 2 cm above the outer ear canal caused highly reproducible VEMP. There were differences in VEMP in both normals and patients depending on side of tapping. In normals, there was a positive-negative ("normal") VEMP on the side contra-lateral to the skull tapping, but no significant VEMP ipsi-laterally. In patients, skull taps above the lesioned ear caused a contra-lateral positive-negative VEMP (as it did in the normals), in addition there was an ipsi-lateral negative-positive ("inverted") VEMP. When skull taps were presented above the healthy ear there was only a small contra-lateral positive-negative VEMP but, similar to the normals, no VEMP ipsi-laterally. CONCLUSIONS: The present data, in conjunction with earlier findings, support a theory that skull-tap VEMP responses are mediated by two different mechanisms. It is suggested that skull tapping causes both a purely ipsi-lateral stimulus side independent SCM response and a bilateral and of opposite polarity SCM response that is stimulus side dependent. Possibly, the skull tap induced VEMP responses are the sum of a stimulation of two species of vestibular receptors, one excited by vibration (which is rather stimulus site independent) and one excited by translation (which is more stimulus site dependent). SIGNIFICANCE: Skull-tap VEMP probably have two different mechanisms. Separation of the two components might reveal the status of different labyrinthine functions.

Skull tap induced vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: an ipsilateral vibration response and a bilateral head acceleration response?

OBJECTIVE: To explore the mechanisms for skull tap induced vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP). METHODS: An electro-mechanical "skull tapper" (that provided a constant stimulus intensity) was used to test the effects of different midline stimulus sites/directions in healthy subjects (n=10) and in patients with severe unilateral loss of vestibular function (n=8). RESULTS: The standardized midline skull taps caused highly reproducible VEMP. There were highly significant differences in amplitude and latency in both normals and patients depending on site/direction of tapping (suggesting a stimulus direction dependency). Occiput skull taps caused, in comparisons to forehead and vertex taps, larger amplitude VEMP with more pronounced differences between the lesioned and the healthy side in the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The present data, in conjunction with earlier findings, support a theory that skull tap VEMP are mediated by two different mechanisms. It is suggested that skull tapping causes both skull vibration and head acceleration. Further, the VEMP would be the sum of the direction-independent vibration-induced response (from the sound-sensitive part of the saccule) and the direction-dependent head acceleration response (from other parts of the labyrinth). SIGNIFICANCE: Skull tap VEMP, as a diagnostic test, is not equivalent to sound-induced VEMP.