Cognitions in generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder patients.

Forty-three patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and 44 patients with panic disorder (PD) were given a standardized interview about thoughts and images during times of anxiety. The two groups differed significantly regarding the ideational content of anxiety. GAD patients experienced more thoughts focusing on themes of mental catastrophes and other catastrophes when suffering from anxiety or anxiety attacks, while PD patients mostly described the theme of physical catastrophes. Only 34% (n = 30) of the total sample reported experiencing images when feeling anxious/having panic. For PD patients (70%) onset of anxiety or panic attacks was precipitated by somatic symptoms (a physical feeling). GAD patients reported that onset of anxiety was precipitated by all three alternatives given: a physical feeling (42%), anxious thoughts (37%), or "it all came at once" (21%). The implications of these results are discussed.

Misinterpretation of body sensations in panic disorder.

Cognitive accounts of panic predict that panic disorder patients will be particularly prone to misinterpret autonomic sensations. Several studies have produced results consistent with this prediction, but each is open to alternative interpretation. To clarify matters, 2 studies administered the Body Sensations Interpretation Questionnaire (BSIQ) to panic patients and controls. Panic patients were more likely to interpret ambiguous autonomic sensations as signs of immediately impending physical or mental disaster and were more likely than other anxiety disorder patients and nonpatients to believe these interpretations. In a 3rd study, a brief version of the BSIQ was shown to have satisfactory test-retest reliability, to change with treatment, and to discriminate treatments that varied in their effects on panic.

Cognitive bias in panic disorder patients and changes after cognitive-behavioral treatments.

The aim of this study was to investigate cognitive biases in panic disorder patients via a questionnaire originally developed by Clark and co-workers [Clark, Salkovskis, Gelder, Koehler, Martin, Anastasiades, Hackman, Middleton & Jeavons, (1988). In Hand, I. & Wittchen, H.-U. (Eds) Panic and Phobias 2] to assess interpretations of ambiguous internal (bodily sensations) and external events. The results showed that, compared to normal controls, panic disorder patients interpreted bodily sensations in a more threatening fashion, while there was no difference concerning external events. Cognitive-behavioral treatments normalized this bias, and Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Applied Relaxation were equally effective in this respect. Moreover, compared to panicking patients, panic-free patients had reduced their cognitive threat bias at post-treatment and follow-up to a significantly larger extent. The results support the cognitive theory of panic disorder.

Applied relaxation vs cognitive behavior therapy in the treatment of panic disorder.

The present study investigated the efficacy of a coping-technique, applied relaxation (AR) and cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), in the treatment of panic disorder. Thirty-eight outpatients fulfilling the DSM-III-R criteria for panic disorder with no (n = 30) or mild (n = 8) avoidance were assessed with independent assessor ratings, self-report scales and self-observation of panic attacks before and after treatment, and at a 1-yr follow-up. The patients were treated individually for 12 weekly sessions. The results showed that both treatments yielded very large improvements, which were maintained, or furthered at follow-up. There was no difference between AR and CBT on any measure. The proportion of panic-free patients were 65 and 74% at post-treatment, and 82 and 89% at follow-up, for AR and CBT, respectively. There were no relapses at follow-up, on the contrary 55% of the patients who still had panic attacks at post-treatment were panic-free at follow-up. Besides affecting panic attacks the treatments also yielded marked and lasting changes on generalized anxiety, depression and cognitive misinterpretations. The conclusion that can be drawn is that both AR and CBT are effective treatments for panic disorder without avoidance.

Applied relaxation, exposure in vivo and cognitive methods in the treatment of panic disorder with agoraphobia.

Forty-five psychiatric outpatients with DSM-III-R diagnosis of panic disorder with agoraphobia were assessed with a battery of self-report, behavioral and cognitive measures before and after therapy, and at a 1 yr follow-up. They were randomly assigned to either Applied Relaxation (AR; n = 15), Exposure in vivo (E; n = 15) or Cognitive Treatment (CT; n = 15) and received 12 individual therapy sessions, once weekly. All patients also had self-exposure instructions. The three treatments yielded significant improvements that were maintained at follow-up. One criterion of clinically significant improvement was fulfilled by 87% of the AR-, 80% of the E- and 60% of the CT-patients at the end of treatment, and 85, 79 and 67%, respectively, at follow-up. Between-group differences were observed on two measures only, both showing better results for AR than for CT. The conclusion that can be drawn is that the three treatments, focussed on different anxiety components, are about equally effective, and the results are maintained 1 yr after the end of treatment.