Comparison of in-vivo body composition using two Lunar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.

OBJECTIVE: To compare in-vivo composition analysis between two dual energy X-ray absorptiometers, a DPX and a DPX/L, from the same manufacturer (LUNAR), pre(Study A) and post(Study B) hardware changes on both absorptiometers. DESIGN: Comparison of (1) quality assurance (QA) data: air-counts low (38 keV), air-counts high (70 keV), air-counts ratio, percent spillover, R-delrin; and (2) total body compartments: total body tissue (TBTISS), total body fat (TBF), percent total body fat (%TBF), total body lean (TBLEAN), total body bone mineral content (TBBMC) and total body bone mineral density (TBBMD), between the two absorptiometers. SETTING: Centre for Bone and Body Composition Research, University of Leeds. SUBJECTS: Study A, 14 normal subjects and Study B, a different cohort of 19 normal subjects, were scanned on both machines on the same day. RESULTS: In Study A, large significant differences were observed in the QA parameters between the two machines. The DPX, air-counts low and air-counts high, being 25% and 22% lower than the DPX/L. The Bland Altman method of analysis indicated that the DPX was significantly higher for TBTISS (0.3 kg), %TBF (2%) and TBF ( 1.4 kg) and correspondingly lower for TBLEAN (-1.0 kg). No significant difference was observed in TBBMC. After the hardware changes (Study B) a marked reduction in the differences in QA air-counts was observed. The DPX air-counts low was now 1% higher and air-counts high 8% lower than the DPX/L. The DPX had now only small significant negative differences for %TBF (-0.6%) and TBF (-0.4 kg) and a small significant positive difference for TBLEAN (0.4 kg), compared to the DPX/L. TBBMC difference although slightly increased, was still non-significant. CONCLUSIONS: The closer agreement observed in the QA parameters after the hardware changes was associated with a reduction in the mean differences, 95%CI of the mean differences and limits of agreement of the comparison of body composition analysis from the Lunar machines using the Bland-Altman method. The study indicates that the QA limits set for bone mineral analysis may require more stringent limits for body composition.

Comparison of changes in bone mineral in idiopathic and secondary osteoporosis following therapy with cyclical disodium etidronate and high dose calcium supplementation.

OBJECTIVE: Our clinical practice has been to offer treatment with cyclical disodium etidronate and high dose calcium supplements (1500-1600 mg/day) to all female patients with osteoporosis who are unable or unwilling to take hormone replacement therapy (HRT), and male osteoporotics. In a retrospective study we compared the effect of this treatment on measures of bone mineral over a 12-month period in women with post-menopausal and secondary osteoporosis. We also assessed its effects in 10 male osteoporotics. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of 83 consecutive patients with osteoporosis who completed 12 months of treatment with disodium etidronate and calcium and who had a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan at baseline and following 12 months of therapy. PATIENTS: The study included 73 women (45 post-menopausal and 28 secondary osteoporotics) and 10 men with established osteoporosis as shown by spinal and femoral bone mineral densities (BMD) > 2 standard deviations (SD) below young normals, and radiological evidence of osteoporosis. MEASUREMENTS: Each patient had routine biochemistry at baseline, an X-ray of thoracic and lumbar spine and a DEXA scan of lumbar spine (L2-L4) and femoral neck. The DEXA scan was repeated following 12 months of therapy. RESULTS: There was no difference between increase in spinal BMD in the post-menopausal (5.7%) versus secondary osteoporotic group (6.7%). There was a significant increase in spinal BMD at 12 months in the 10 male osteoporotics (9.0%, P < 0.01). No overall change in femoral neck BMD was noted. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclical disodium etidronate given with high dose calcium supplements is equally effective in increasing spinal bone mineral density in post-menopausal and secondary osteoporosis. It also results in a significant rise in spinal bone mineral density in male osteoporotics. Whether this produces a reduction in fracture rates is unknown.

Variation in lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral measured by dual energy X-ray absorption: a study of 329 normal women.

Reference ranges used in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) have previously used piecewise linear fits to the whole data set for spine or femur bone mineral density (BMD) as a function of age. In a study of 329 Caucasian normal women we present a refinement to the normal range by fitting straight lines between quinquennial mean values of BMD for each site measured (lumbar spine, femoral neck and Ward's triangle). From the age of 40 years onwards the premenopausal women demonstrated minimal loss of BMD whereas postmenopausal women showed a rapid loss amounting to 27% in the lumbar spine, 27% in the femoral neck and 38% in the Ward's triangle region in the age range under examination. Comparison of quinquennial means for pre and postmenopausal women in age bands 45-49 years and 50-54 years shows that at these ages postmenopausal BMD is significantly lower than premenopausal BMD (P < 0.05). This finding suggests that separate normal ranges should be used for pre and postmenopausal women. As reduction in the production of oestrogen is a major factor in postmenopausal bone loss and oestrogen function is related to years since menopause (YSM), a more logical way of displaying postmenopausal normal BMD ranges would be in terms of YSM rather than chronological age. Such data are given in this paper.

Bone ultrasonic attenuation in women: reproducibility, normal variation and comparison with photon absorptiometry.

The reproducibility of two methods of measuring broadband ultrasonic attenuation (BUA) in the calcaneus have been studied. An improvement in reproducibility in vivo from 9.6% to 2.8% between old and new techniques has been observed. Measurements of the calcaneus using BUA were correlated with measurements of bone mineral density measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in the lumbar spine, femur and total body and bone mineral content in the distal and proximal forearm measured by single photon absorptiometry. For the older BUA technique the correlation coefficients ranged between r = 0.27 and r = 0.34. For the newer BUA technique the correlation coefficients ranged between r = 0.49 and r = 0.62 and were all significant (P less than 0.001).