ABSTRACT
The Neural Crest, a transient epithelium in vertebrate embryos, is the source of putative stem cells known to give rise to neuronal, glial and endocrine components of the peripheral (sensory, autonomic and enteric) nervous system (PNS) and pigment cells in the skin. The Neural Crest is also widely believed to be the source of mesectodermal derivatives (skeletogenic, odontogenic, connective tissue and smooth muscle mesenchyme) in the vertebrate head [see (Bronner and LeDouarin, 2012; Le Douarin, 2012; Le Douarin and Kalcheim, 1999); see also (Hörstadius, 1950; Weston, 1970)]. This conventional understanding of the broad developmental potential of the Neural Crest has been challenged over the past few years (Breau et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2013a, 2013b; Weston et al., 2004), based on recognition that the definition of the embryonic epithelia that comprise the Neural Crest may be imprecise. Indeed, the definition of the embryonic tissues understood to constitute the Neural Crest has changed considerably since it was first described by Wilhelm His 150 years ago (His, 1868). Today, the operational definition of the Neural Crest is inconsistent and functionally ambiguous. We believe that more precise definitions of the embryonic tissues involved in Neural Crest development would be useful to understand (1) the range of cellular phenotypes that actually segregate from it, (2) when this lineage diversification occurs, and (3) how diversification is regulated. In this idiosyncratic review, we aim to explain our concerns with the current definitions in this field, and in the chiastic words of Samuel Johnson (1781), " make new things familiar and familiar things new".(1) Then, we will try to distinguish the developmental events crucial to the regulation of Neural Crest development at both cranial and trunk axial levels of vertebrate embryos, and address some of the implicit assumptions that underlie the conventional interpretation of experimental results on the origin and fates of Neural Crest-derived cells. We hope our discussion will resolve some ambiguities regarding both the range of derivatives in the Neural Crest lineage and the conventional understanding that cranial mesectodermal derivatives share a common Neural Crest-derived lineage precursor with components of the PNS.
Subject(s)
Cell Lineage/physiology , Embryonic Development/physiology , Epithelium/embryology , Models, Biological , Morphogenesis/physiology , Neural Crest/embryology , Skull/embryology , Vertebrates/embryology , Animals , Cell Movement , Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition/physiology , Humans , Skull/cytology , Species SpecificityABSTRACT
The neural crest is a transient structure unique to vertebrate embryos that gives rise to multiple lineages along the rostrocaudal axis. In cranial regions, neural crest cells are thought to differentiate into chondrocytes, osteocytes, pericytes and stromal cells, which are collectively termed ectomesenchyme derivatives, as well as pigment and neuronal derivatives. There is still no consensus as to whether the neural crest can be classified as a homogenous multipotent population of cells. This unresolved controversy has important implications for the formation of ectomesenchyme and for confirmation of whether the neural fold is compartmentalized into distinct domains, each with a different repertoire of derivatives. Here we report in mouse and chicken that cells in the neural fold delaminate over an extended period from different regions of the cranial neural fold to give rise to cells with distinct fates. Importantly, cells that give rise to ectomesenchyme undergo epithelial-mesenchymal transition from a lateral neural fold domain that does not express definitive neural markers, such as Sox1 and N-cadherin. Additionally, the inference that cells originating from the cranial neural ectoderm have a common origin and cell fate with trunk neural crest cells prompted us to revisit the issue of what defines the neural crest and the origin of the ectomesenchyme.
Subject(s)
Ectoderm/embryology , Mesencephalon/metabolism , Mesoderm/embryology , Neural Crest/metabolism , Animals , Cadherins/biosynthesis , Cell Differentiation , Cell Lineage , Chick Embryo , Ectoderm/cytology , Embryo Culture Techniques , Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition , Mesencephalon/cytology , Mesencephalon/embryology , Mesoderm/cytology , Mice , Neural Crest/cytology , Neural Crest/embryology , Neural Plate/cytology , SOXB1 Transcription Factors/biosynthesisABSTRACT
The neural crest is generally believed to be the embryonic source of skeletogenic mesenchyme (ectomesenchyme) in the vertebrate head and other derivatives, including pigment cells and neurons and glia of the peripheral nervous system. Although classical transplantation experiments leading to this conclusion assumed that embryonic neural folds were homogeneous epithelia, we reported that embryonic cranial neural folds contain spatially and phenotypically distinct domains, including a lateral nonneural domain with cells that coexpress E-cadherin and PDGFRalpha and a thickened mediodorsal neuroepithelial domain where these proteins are reduced or absent. We now show that Wnt1-Cre is expressed in the lateral nonneural epithelium of rostral neural folds and that cells coexpressing Cre-recombinase and PDGFRalpha delaminate precociously from some of this nonneural epithelium. We also show that ectomesenchymal cells exhibit beta-galactosidase activity in embryos heterozygous for an Ecad-lacZ reporter knock- in allele. We conclude that a lateral nonneural domain of the neural fold epithelium, which we call "metablast," is a source of ectomesenchyme distinct from the neural crest. We suggest that closer analysis of the origin of ectomesenchyme might help to understand (i) the molecular-genetic regulation of development of both neural crest and ectomesenchyme lineages; (ii) the early developmental origin of skeletogenic and connective tissue mesenchyme in the vertebrate head; and (iii) the presumed origin of head and branchial arch skeletal and connective tissue structures during vertebrate evolution.
Subject(s)
Mesoderm/growth & development , Neural Crest/anatomy & histology , Neural Crest/physiology , Skull/embryology , Animals , Cadherins/genetics , Embryo, Mammalian , Epithelium/embryology , Integrases/biosynthesis , Integrases/genetics , Mice , Mice, Transgenic , Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alpha/metabolism , Wnt1 Protein/biosynthesis , Wnt1 Protein/genetics , beta-Galactosidase/geneticsABSTRACT
The neural crest gives rise to glial cells in the peripheral nervous system. Among the peripheral glia, Schwann cells form the myelin often wrapping the peripheral axons. Compared to other crest-derived cell lineages such as neurons, the analysis of fate determination and subsequent differentiation of Schwann cells is not well advanced, partly due to the lack of early markers of this phenotype. In this study, we have identified a gene, uniquely expressed in avian embryo Schwann cell precursors, which encodes a novel secreted factor, designated Seraf (Schwann cell-specific EGF-like repeat autocrine factor). Expression of Seraf and P0 delineates the earliest phase of Schwann cell differentiation. Seraf binds to neural crest cells and Schwann cells, and affects the distribution of Schwann cells, when introduced to chicken embryos during neural crest migration. Our results suggest an autocrine function of Seraf and provide a significant step to understand the developmental processes of Schwann cell lineage.
Subject(s)
Cell Differentiation/genetics , Nervous System/cytology , Proteins/genetics , Schwann Cells/cytology , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Base Sequence , Chickens , Cloning, Molecular , Coturnix , DNA Primers , Molecular Sequence Data , Proteins/chemistry , Schwann Cells/metabolism , Sequence Homology, Amino AcidABSTRACT
Expression of Sox2, which encodes an HMG-box-type transcription factor, is down-regulated in the neural plate when neural crest segregates from dorsal neural tube and remains low during crest cell migration. Sox2 expression is subsequently up-regulated in some crest-derived cells in the developing peripheral nervous system and is later restricted to glial sublineages. Misexpression of Sox2 and mutant forms of Sox2 both in neural plate explants and in embryonic ectoderm reveals that Sox2 inhibits neural crest formation as a transcriptional activator. Similar manipulation of Sox2 function in migratory and postmigratory neural crest-derived cells indicates that Sox2 regulates proliferation and differentiation in developing peripheral nervous system. Developmental Dynamics 229:74-86, 2004.
Subject(s)
DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Neural Crest/embryology , Neural Crest/metabolism , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Cell Differentiation , Cell Division , Cells, Cultured , Chick Embryo , Coturnix , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , HMGB Proteins , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Mutation , Neural Crest/cytology , Peripheral Nervous System/cytology , Peripheral Nervous System/embryology , Peripheral Nervous System/metabolism , Receptors, Notch , SOXB1 Transcription Factors , Signal TransductionABSTRACT
The striking similarity between mesodermally derived fibroblasts and ectomesenchyme cells, which are thought to be derivatives of the neural crest, has long been a source of interest and controversy. In mice, the gene encoding the alpha subunit of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFRalpha) is expressed both by mesodermally derived mesenchymal cells and by ectomesenchyme. Whole-mount immunostaining previously revealed that PDGFRalpha is present in the cephalic neural fold epithelium of early murine embryos (Takakura et al. [1997] J Histochem Cytochem 45:883-893). We now show that, within the neural fold, a sharp boundary exists between E-cadherin-expressing non-neural epithelium and the neural epithelium of the dorsal ridge. In addition, we found that cells coexpressing E-cadherin and PDGFRalpha are present in the non-neural epithelium of the neural folds. These observations raise the possibility that at least some PDGFRalpha(+) ectomesenchyme originates from the lateral non-neural domain of neural fold epithelium. This inference is consistent with previous reports (Nichols [ 1981] J Embryol Exp Morphol 64:105-120; Nichols [ 1986] Am J Anat 176:221-231) that mesenchymal cells emerge precociously from an epithelial neural fold domain resembling the primitive streak in the early embryonic epiblast. Therefore, we propose the name "metablast" for this non-neural epithelial domain to indicate that it is the site of a delayed local delamination of mesenchyme similar to involution of mesoderm during gastrulation. We further propose the testable hypothesis that neural crest and ectomesenchyme are developmentally distinct progenitor populations and that at least some ectomesenchyme is metablast-derived rather than neural crest-derived tissue. Developmental Dynamics 229:118-130, 2004.