Prognostic significance of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand and its receptors in adjuvantly treated stage III colon cancer patients.

PURPOSE: In preclinical models, there is synergism between chemotherapy and recombinant human tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) on apoptosis induction in tumor cells. Therefore, the prognostic relevance was analyzed of the expression of TRAIL and its death receptors DR4 and DR5 on disease-free survival and overall survival in stage III colon cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Tissue microarrays were constructed of primary tumor tissue from 376 stage III colon cancer patients treated in a randomized adjuvant chemotherapy study (fluorouracil/levamisole v fluorouracil/levamisole/leucovorin) and stained immunohistochemically for TRAIL, DR4, and DR5. Log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazard analysis, with adjustment for treatment arm, sex, age, N stage, microsatellite instability status, and p53 mutation status, were performed. RESULTS: The majority of tumors showed high expression of TRAIL (83%), DR4 (92%), and DR5 (87%). Median follow-up was 43 months. High DR4 expression was associated with worse disease-free survival (odds ratio [OR] = 2.19; 95% CI, 1.06 to 4.53; P = .03), worse overall survival (OR = 2.22; 95% CI,1.03 to 4.81; P = .04) and shorter time to recurrence (P = .02) compared with those with low DR4 expression. TRAIL or DR5 expression had no prognostic value. CONCLUSION: High DR4 expression is associated with worse disease-free and overall survival in stage III adjuvant-treated colon cancer patients. Evaluation of DR4 expression in stage III colon cancer patients may identify a subset requiring more aggressive adjuvant treatment.

Determination of TP53 mutation is more relevant than microsatellite instability status for the prediction of disease-free survival in adjuvant-treated stage III colon cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Microsatellite instability (MSI), TP53 mutation, and KRAS mutation status have been reported as prognostic factors in colon cancer. Most studies, however, have included heterogeneous groups of patients with respect to cancer stage. We determined the prognostic relevance of high-frequency MSI (MSI-H), TP53 mutations, and KRAS mutations in a well-defined group of patients with stage III colon cancer (N = 391), randomly assigned for adjuvant treatment with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Three hundred ninety-one tumor specimens were available. MSI was determined in 273 specimens, and mutation analyses of TP53 and KRAS were performed in 220 and 205 specimens, respectively. RESULTS: In a univariate analysis, MSI-H (44 of 273; 16%) was associated with a longer disease-free survival (DFS; P = .038), but in a multivariate model adjusting for nodal involvement, histology, invasion, and grade of tumor, the association of MSI status with DFS did no longer reach statistical significance, though the risk estimate for microsatellite stability versus MSI-H tumors did not change much. Mutant TP53, found in 116 (53%) of 220 tumors, was associated with a shorter DFS, both in univariate (P = .009) and multivariate analyses (P = .018), whereas KRAS mutations (58 of 205; 28%) did not show any prognostic significance. CONCLUSION: Both mutant TP53 and MSI-H seem to be prognostic indicators for disease-free survival, but only TP53 retains statistical significance after adjusting for clinical heterogeneity. Thus, in adjuvantly treated patients with stage III colon cancer, presence or absence of a TP53 mutation should be considered as a better predictor for DFS than MSI status.

Expression of tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand death receptors in sporadic and hereditary colorectal tumours: potential targets for apoptosis induction.

Tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and antibodies against TRAIL receptors death receptor 4 (DR4) and death receptor 5 (DR5) are under investigation for cancer therapy. To study the potential application of these agents, the expression of DR4 and DR5 were studied immunohistochemically in colorectal adenomas and carcinomas from patients with sporadic disease (n=74 and 56, respectively), familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP, n=41 and 4, respectively) and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, n=50 and 21, respectively). BAX, which is frequently mutated in tumours with high-frequency microsatellite instability (MSI-H) may play a role in sensitivity to TRAIL. Therefore, MSI-H carcinomas (n=42, of which 27 sporadic and 15 HNPCC) were analysed for apoptotic activity, assessed by M30 immunoreactivity, and BAX mutations. Most adenomas from all three patient groups expressed DR4 and DR5. Most carcinomas expressed DR4, except for six cases, all with mucinous histology. All carcinomas, including mucinous carcinomas, showed DR5 expression. BAX mutations were found in 6/42 MSI-H cancers with similar apoptotic indices and expression of DR4, DR5 and TRAIL in BAX mutant and wild-type cases. Since most sporadic and hereditary colorectal neoplasms express DR4 and DR5, targeting of these receptors may be a potential prevention or treatment strategy.

A substantial proportion of microsatellite-unstable colon tumors carry TP53 mutations while not showing chromosomal instability.

Chromosomal instability in colon tumors implies the presence of numerical and structural chromosome aberrations and is further characterized by the absence of microsatellite instability and the occurrence of KRAS and/or TP53 mutations. In a previous screening of 194 colon tumors for both microsatellite instability and TP53 mutation, we found 25 microsatellite-unstable tumors, in 9 (36%) of which, presumed to be chromosomally stable, there were TP53 mutations. This prompted us to investigate whether a TP53 mutation in these microsatellite-unstable tumors would be an indicator of chromosomal instability, that is, whether this would be a category of tumors showing both microsatellite and chromosomal instability. For chromosomal instability assessment, we performed array-comparative genomic hybridization analysis of tumor and control DNA extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded stage III colon tumor specimens. The array consisted of 435 subtelomere-specific BACs. We compared all but one (whose DNA was of bad quality) of the microsatellite-unstable TP53 mutation-containing tumors (8) with a similarly sized group of microsatellite-unstable tumors without TP53 mutation (11). Microsatellite-unstable tumors with a TP53 mutation showed on average 0.9 aberrations (range 0-3) when assessed with this array system. Those without a TP53 mutation showed on average 0.7 aberrations (range 0-2). Thus, microsatellite-unstable tumors showed few chromosomal abnormalities regardless of TP53 mutation status. Because, in our study, the microsatellite-stable tumors had on average 3.4chromosomal abnormalities (range 0-7), a clear difference exists between microsatellite-unstable and -stable tumors. Because a substantial proportion of microsatellite-unstable colon tumors carry a TP53 mutation while showing relativelyfewchromosomal aberrations, a TP53 mutation in these tumors cannot be considered to be an indicator of chromosomal instability.

Genetic alterations in locally advanced stage II/III colon cancer: a search for prognostic markers.

Heterogeneity in advanced colon cancer leads to different results from adjuvant chemotherapy. To identify groups of patients who may need adjuvant treatment, molecular staging and correlation with clinical data may be helpful in classifying histologically similar tumors. Colon cancer develops through a multistep process with an accumulation of multiple genetic alterations that are often the cause of a form of genomic instability. The 2 best known mechanisms of genomic instability are chromosomal instability (CIN) and microsatellite instability (MSI). The CIN phenotype is found in approximately 85% of sporadic colon cancers and is characterized by aneuploidy, multiple chromosomal rearrangements, and an accumulation of somatic mutations in oncogenes such as K-ras and tumor suppressor genes such as TP53 and APC. The MSI phenotype is associated with small insertions and deletions mainly in repetitive sequences (microsatellites) and is found in approximately 15% of cases. This instability, often referred to as high-frequency MSI (MSI-H), is caused by defects of the mismatch repair system, which is involved in repairing DNA errors that arise during DNA replication. Clear-cut correlations between the somatic genetic alterations in tumors and the clinical behavior of the tumor are rare. Only a few markers, such as MSI-H and TP53, seem to have a prognostic value. Mutations in the TP53 gene are associated with an aggressive tumor growth and subsequent reduced survival, whereas MSI-H seems to be correlated with a favorable outcome. In general, predicting biologic behavior of in particular stage III colon cancers is difficult and remains a great clinical problem.

Distinct patterns of KRAS mutations in colorectal carcinomas according to germline mismatch repair defects and hMLH1 methylation status.

In sporadic colorectal tumours the BRAFV600E is associated with microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and inversely associated to KRAS mutations. Tumours from hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) patients carrying germline mutations in hMSH2 or hMLH1 do not show BRAFV600E, however no consistent data exist regarding KRAS mutation frequency and spectrum in HNPCC tumours. We investigated KRAS in 158 HNPCC tumours from patients with germline hMLH1, hMSH2 or hMSH6 mutations, 166 MSI-H and 688 microsatellite stable (MSS) sporadic carcinomas. All tumours were characterized for MSI and 81 of 166 sporadic MSI-H colorectal cancer (CRCs) were analysed for hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation. KRAS mutations were observed in 40% of HNPCC tumours, and the mutation frequency varied upon the mismatch repair gene affected: 48% (29/61) in hMSH2, 32% (29/91) in hMLH1 and 83% (5/6) in hMSH6 (P = 0.01). KRAS mutation frequency was different between HNPCC, MSS and MSI-H CRCs (P = 0.002), and MSI-H with hMLH1 hypermethylation (P = 0.005). Furthermore, HNPCC CRCs had more G13D mutations than MSS (P < 0.0001), MSI-H (P = 0.02) or MSI-H tumours with hMLH1 hypermethylation (P = 0.03). HNPCC colorectal and sporadic MSI-H tumours without hMLH1 hypermethylation shared similar KRAS mutation frequency, in particular G13D. In conclusion, we show that depending on the genetic/epigenetic mechanism leading to MSI-H, the outcome in terms of oncogenic activation may be different, reinforcing the idea that HNPCC, sporadic MSI-H (depending on the hMLH1 status) and MSS CRCs, may target distinct kinases within the RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway.

No association between two MLH3 variants (S845G and P844L)and colorectal cancer risk.

Recently we identified a new variant, S845G, in the MLH3 gene in 7 out of 327 patients suspected of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer but not fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria and in 1 out of 188 control subjects. As this variant might play a role in causing sporadic colorectal cancer, we analyzed its prevalence in sporadic colorectal cancer patients. We analyzed a small part of exon 1 of the MLH3 gene, including the S845G variant, in germline DNA of 467 white sporadic colorectal cancer patients and 497 white controls. The S845G variant was detected in five patients and eight controls; the results thus indicate that this variant does not confer an increased colorectal cancer risk. Another variant (P844L) was clearly a polymorphism. Three other missense variants were rare and the sample size of the study was too small to conclude whether they are pathogenic. In conclusion, no association was observed between two MLH3 variants (P844L and S845G) and colorectal cancer risk.