An evidence-based strategy to achieve equivalency and interoperability for social-behavioral determinants of health assessment, storage, exchange, and use.

The interoperable exchange of social-behavioral determinants of health data is challenging due to complex factors including multiple recommendations, multiple tools with varying domains, scoring, and cutpoints, and lack of terminology code sets for storing assessments and findings. This article describes a strategy that permits scoring by social-behavioral determinants of health domain to create interoperability and equivalency across tools, settings, and populations. The three-tier scoring strategy converts social-behavioral determinants of health data to (1) be used immediately at point of care by identifying social needs or social risk factors, (2) be consumed within analytics and algorithms and for secondary analysis, and (3) produce total scores that reflect social determinant burden and behavioral determinant burden across populations and settings within a healthcare system. The strategy supports the six uses recommended by the National Academy of Medicine, provides flexibility in choice of social-behavioral determinants of health tool, and leverages the power of social-behavioral determinants of health data in healthcare delivery.

Capturing health literacy assessment in the electronic health record through evidence-based concept creation: A review of the literature and recommendations for action.

Health literacy is the capacity to understand and act upon health-related information and navigate the healthcare system. Published evidence demonstrates a relationship between health literacy and health status. Because of this, there are increasingly calls for a health literacy assessment to be collected and stored in the electronic health record for use by the healthcare team. This article describes the results of a literature review of health literacy assessment instruments with the goal of formulating semantically interoperable concepts that may be used to store the interpretation of the health literacy assessment in the electronic health record. The majority of health literacy instruments could be stored in the electronic health record using a three-concept solution of inadequate, marginal and adequate health literacy. This three-concept solution fully supports semantic interoperability needs across the patient care spectrum.

Factors affecting the progress of community health assessment and improvement activities in kansas.

CONTEXT: Community health assessment (CHA) and community health improvement planning (CHIP) are important functions for local health departments (LHDs) but may present challenges, particularly in rural settings. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this 2-year, mixed-methods study was to identify factors that impede or promote the timeliness and quality of CHA-CHIP completion in Kansas. DESIGN: Focus group interviews, conducted at baseline (2012) and at 1 year (2013), included 15 and 21 groups, respectively. Scores from a 12-item attitudinal survey that explored participants' confidence to perform CHA-CHIP activities were collected in tandem with focus groups. SETTING: Kansas counties that planned to conduct a CHA-CHIP process during 2012 and/or 2013 were eligible to participate. PARTICIPANTS: There were 128 study participants (57 in 2012, 71 in 2013), who were predominantly female (83%), aged 51 years or older (61.4%), and lived in rural areas (84.6%). Public health region representation in 2012 and 2013 was 73% and 93%, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in perceptions about CHA-CHIP inputs, process, outputs, outcomes, and self-efficacy to perform CHA-CHIP activities were explored. RESULTS: Progress in CHA-CHIP implementation was reported in 2013. Most participants perceived the CHA-CHIP process as valuable and enhanced the LHD's visibility. Rural participants reported having completed the CHA phase, whereas urban LHDs had progressed into the planning and implementation stage. Potentiators of the CHA-CHIP process included (1) parallel assessment activities conducted by other community organizations, and (2) for rural counties, a functioning 501(c)3 community health coalition. Perceptions about the importance of partnership and leadership were unchanged. A multivariate regression analysis revealed a significant time effect and rural-urban difference in perceived self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Workforce development and public health system development issues are central concerns identified by this study. Local health departments with constrained resources and limited staff, despite additional training, are unlikely to develop the capacity needed to effectively support CHA-CHIP, making long-term sustainability uncertain.

Breastfeeding interventions in Kansas: a qualitative process evaluation of program goals and objectives.

Across the state of Kansas, eighteen public health departments received funding through the 2011 Breastfeeding Grant Initiative to start a breastfeeding intervention. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the progress toward program goals and objectives. This study was a process evaluation. Qualitative data were collected from recipient health departments at two time-points during the program year. Structured, open-ended questions were asked through telephone interviews. This study examined: (1) progress toward program goals and objectives, (2) problems encountered during implementation, and (3) evaluation measures employed to assess program impact. All health departments reported making significant progress toward program goals and objectives and reported successful collaboration with other healthcare providers. The use of breast pumps, educational classes, and professional training of staff were reported as providing the best outcome in the promotion of breastfeeding. The majority of respondents did not measure program impact. From a public health perspective, it is important that infants receive breast milk for the first six months of life. It appears that goals and objectives set a priori guided health departments with the administration of their breastfeeding program. Results may be used to enhance and sustain delivery of breastfeeding support programs in Kansas communities.

Voices across Kansas: community health assessment and improvement efforts among local health departments.

CONTEXT: Community health assessment (CHA) and community health improvement planning (CHIP) is central to public health accreditation and essential functions and therefore important to local health departments (LHDs). However, rural states face significant challenges to pursue public health accreditation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this statewide study was to identify factors that impede or promote the timeliness of CHA and CHIP completion. DESIGN: Fifteen focus groups, representing 11 of 15 public health regions, were conducted via telephone, using a structured interview script between April and September 2012. SETTING: The sampling frame for the project was represented by counties in Kansas that planned to conduct a CHA-CHIP activity during 2012. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N = 76) were LHD administrators, hospital representatives, and key community stakeholders from frontier, rural, and urban settings who were involved in CHA-CHIP activities. They were predominantly female (86.0%) and 51 years or older (66.7%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The study assessed perceptions and opinions about the inputs, process, outputs, and outcomes of CHA-CHIP activities within the community. RESULTS: Overall, CHA-CHIP implementation in Kansas was in its early stages. Rural counties reported a lack of capacity and confidence to perform many CHA-CHIP activities. Early CHA-CHIP adopters were located in more populous, metropolitan areas and had progressed further into the CHA-CHIP process. Regardless of rural/urban status, a history of collaborative activity among community stakeholder groups appeared to promote progress in CHA-CHIP completion. Participants reported that additional funding, time, trained staff, technical assistance, and community leadership were needed to conduct CHA-CHIP activities. Barriers included maintaining required LHD services while conducting assessment and planning activities and differences in public health and federal cycles for performing CHA. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings have implications for strengthening rural workforce development and technical assistance for CHA-CHIP activities.

Treatment provider is most predictive of ED dismissal in minimally-injured trauma patients: a retrospective review.

BACKGROUND: Secondary triage protocols have been described in the literature as physiologic (first-tier) criteria and mechanism-related (second-tier) criteria to determine the level of trauma activation. There is debate as to the efficiency of triage decisions based on mechanism of injury which may result in overtriage and overuse of limited trauma resources. Our institution developed and implemented an advanced three-tier trauma alert system in which stable patients presenting with blunt traumatic mechanism of injury would be evaluated by the emergency department (ED) physician rather than the trauma surgeon. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACSCOT) requires that operational changes be monitored and evaluated for patient safety and performance. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the process, as well as outcomes, of patient care pre and post implementation of the new triage protocol. The secondary aim was to determine predictor variables that were associated with ED dismissal. METHODS: A retrospective blinded pre/post process change implementation explicit chart review was conducted to compare process and outcomes of minimally injured trauma patients who were field triaged by mechanism of injury. Generalized linear modeling was performed to determine which predictor variables were associated with ED dismissal. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in minutes to physician evaluation, CT scan, OR/ICU disposition, readmission rates, safety or quality. Significant differences only occurred in time to chest x-ray, length of stay in ED, and ED dismissal rates. Trauma surgeon and ED physician patient groups did not differ on ISS, age, or sex. The only significant predictor for ED dismissal was treatment provider, with ED physicians 3.6 times more likely to dismiss the patient from the emergency department. CONCLUSIONS: ED physicians provided compble care as measured by safety, timeliness, and quality in minimally-injured patients triaged to our trauma center based only on mechanism of injury. Moreover, ED physicians were more likely to dismiss patients from the ED. A three-tiered internal triaging protocol can redirect resource usage to reduce the burden on the trauma service. This may be increasingly beneficial in trauma models in which the trauma surgeons also serve as critical care intensivists.