Patients' experience of breast reconstruction after mastectomy and its influence on postoperative satisfaction.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer patients have the option to choose a breast reconstruction after mastectomy. A range of studies have postulated that patients' individually appraised significance of their breast is an important factor in the decision for or against breast reconstruction. This study explored the individually perceived significance of the breast among patients with and without breast reconstruction and its correlation with postoperative satisfaction. METHODS: Ten patients without breast reconstruction, and ten patients with immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy participated in the study. The perceived importance of the breast and the pre-and postoperative esthetic satisfaction of the patients were obtained using an 11-point Likert scale. Qualitative interviews explored patients' views on the meaning of their breast and their experience after surgery. RESULTS: Patients who had decided for breast reconstruction rated the importance of their breast for femininity (p = 0.004) and attractiveness (p = 0.037) significantly higher than patients without reconstruction. The qualitative data provide evidence that the breast of a woman fulfills a variety of intrapsychic and interactional functions. Difficulties in integrating the reconstructed breast into the body image were reported. A high importance of the breast correlated significantly with a decrease in satisfaction with the breast after reconstruction (rs = -0.652, p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who found their breast to be highly important were more likely to decide for a reconstruction. Mastectomy has an impact on various psychosocial variables but impairments may also occur after breast reconstruction. Patients reporting a high significance of their breast showed the greatest decrease in satisfaction with their breast after reconstruction.

Stress management training for surgeons-a randomized, controlled, intervention study.

BACKGROUND: Stress and coping influence performance. In this study, we evaluate a novel stress management intervention for surgeons. METHODS: A randomized control group design was used. Sixteen surgeons were allocated to either the intervention or control group. The intervention group received training on coping strategies, mental rehearsal, and relaxation. Performance measures were obtained during simulated operations and included objective-structured assessment of technical skill, observational teamwork assessment for surgery, and end product assessment rated by experts. Stress was assessed using the state-trait-anxiety-inventory, observer rating, coefficient of heart rate variability (C_HRV), and salivary cortisol. The number of applied surgical coping strategies (number of coping strategies [NC]) was assessed using a questionnaire. A t test for paired samples investigated any within-subject changes, and multiple linear regression analysis explored between-subject effects. Interviews explored surgeons' perceptions of the intervention. RESULTS: The intervention group showed enhanced observational teamwork assessment for surgery performance (t = -2.767, P < 0.05), and increased coping skills (t = -4.690, P < 0.01), and reduced stress reflected inheart rate variability (t = -4.008, P < 0.01). No significant changes were identified in the control group. Linear regression analysis confirmed a significant effect on NC (ß = -0.739, P < 0.01). Qualitative data analysis revealed improved technical skills, decision making, and confidence. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention had beneficial effects on coping, stress, and nontechnical skills during simulated surgery.

The effects of stress and coping on surgical performance during simulations.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the effects of surgeons' stress levels and coping strategies on surgical performance during simulated operations. METHODS: Thirty surgeons carried out each a non-crisis and a crisis scenario of a simulated operation. Surgeons' stress levels were assessed by several measures: self-assessments and observer ratings of stress, heart rate, heart rate variability, and salivary cortisol. Coping strategies were explored qualitatively and quantified to a coping score. Experience in surgery was included as an additional predictor. Outcome measures consisted of technical surgical skills using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS), nontechnical surgical skills using Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery (OTAS), and the quality of the operative end product using End Product Assessment (EPA). Uni- and multivariate linear regression were used to assess the independent effects of predictor variables on each performance measure. RESULTS: During the non-crisis simulation, a high coping score and experience significantly enhanced EPA (beta1, 0.279; 0.009-0.460; P= 0.04; beta2, 0.571; 4.328-12.669, P< 0.001; respectively). During the crisis simulation, a significant beneficial effect of the interaction of high experience and low stress on all performance measures was found (EPA: beta, 0.537; 2.079-8.543; OSATS: beta, 0.707; 8.708-17.860; OTAS: beta, 0.654; 13.090-30.483; P< 0.01). Coping significantly enhanced nontechnical skills (beta, 0.302; 0.117-1.624, P= 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians' stress and coping influenced surgical performance during simulated operations. Hence, these are critical factors for the quality of health care.

Simulated anaesthetists in high fidelity simulations for surgical training: feasibility of a training programme for actors.

BACKGROUND: High fidelity simulations within the operating theatre (OT) require physical infrastructure and a full OT team. Such teams place heavy demands on clinical service. Research and training programmes in our surgical department were often compromised by the late cancellation of anaesthetists. AIMS: This paper describes and evaluates a training programme in which actors were trained as simulated anaesthetists. METHODS: The training programme was developed, piloted and implemented in a surgical education programme. Evaluation consisted of interviews with actors after the series of simulations. Surgical participants were not informed that the anaesthetist was an actor until after the simulation when they completed an interview and a 10-point authenticity scale (1 = not at all to 10 = highly authentic). RESULTS: Three actors played the role of anaesthetists in 34 scenarios with 17 surgeons in simulations of carotid endarterectomy. Although initially anxious about their role, actors found the training programme valuable and came to feel confident. Mean ratings of anaesthetist authenticity was 8.1 (Range 2-10). Surgeons' comments showed that in most scenarios they found the anaesthetist's performance highly authentic. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study demonstrates the feasibility of using actors as anaesthetists in high fidelity surgical simulations, there are also limitations. Factors contributing to success included: selective actor recruitment; written training materials; formal OT orientation, audio link between the control room and the actor; the opportunity to rehearse; and, structured observations.

Communication skills for mobile remote presence technology in clinical interactions.

The use of mobile robotic units for teleconsultation means that the clinician's cognitive and attention skills are divided between tele-operation of the robotic unit and the consultation with the patient. We developed a communication guide based on evidence-based patient-centred interviewing and telephone conferencing skills. The communication guide was tested by five trainee surgeons in a pre- and post-test design. Each surgeon completed three simulated patient consultations. After reading the communication guide, trainees completed three further consultations. The trainees rated authenticity, degree of difficulty, familiarity of clinical presentation and confidence in using telepresence to manage the consultations. Their mean scores were 3.0-4.6, 2.2-4.0, 4.4-4.8 and 3.2-4.2 respectively (maximum possible score 5). The simulated patients rated their satisfaction with communication. Their ratings suggested that there were areas for communication skills development with mean scores ranging from 8.2 to 11.4 (maximum possible score = 15). Although we do not yet know enough about communicating with real patients using mobile robotic units, the communication guide appeared to be useful in our simulated interactions.

The human face of simulation: patient-focused simulation training.

Simulation is firmly established within health care training but often focuses on training for technical tasks and can overlook crucial skills such as professionalism and physician-patient communication. The authors locate this paper within current developments in health care and relate it to the literature on simulation. They make the case for placing real human "patients" (played by actors) within simulation environments, thereby ensuring that the training experience remains rooted in actual practice. By practicing repeatedly within a safe environment, technical skills, communication with patients and team members, decision making, and clinical judgment may all be practiced and mastered while preserving patient safety. In elaborating this concept of patient-focused simulation (PFS), the authors draw on work already published by their group and several recent studies that are in review. These explore PFS in low, medium, and high complexity settings. Important or rare situations can be recreated and practiced, as well as key procedures required across a range of experience levels and clinical specialties. Finally, the case is made for curriculum redesign to ensure that simulator-based technical skills training and assessment take place within an authentic context that reflects the wider elements of clinical practice.

The effects of stress on surgical performance.

BACKGROUND: Although the general literature on stress and performance is extensive, little is known about specific effects of stress in surgical practice. This qualitative study explored key surgical stressors, their impact on performance, and coping strategies used by surgeons. METHODS: Individual in-depth semistructured interviews with surgeons were analyzed by 2 researchers independently. Key themes were discussed within the research team. RESULTS: Sixteen interviews were performed, including interviews with consultants (n = 9) and surgeons in training (n = 7). A wide range of intraoperative stressors was identified. Although stress had both positive and negative effects, undue levels of stress impaired judgment, decision making, and communication. Although junior surgeons showed uncertainty about their ability to cope, senior surgeons had developed sophisticated strategies for controlling each situation. CONCLUSIONS: Although stress poses significant risks, coping strategies are not taught explicitly during surgical training. This article presents a framework for categorizing surgical stress and suggests key elements for effective coping strategies.

Evaluation of a framework for case development and simulated patient training for complex procedures.

BACKGROUND: Simulation for training and assessing clinicians is increasing but often overlooks the patient's perspective. In this paper, actors are trained to portray patients undergoing operations under local anesthetic within a high-fidelity simulated operating theater (SOT). There are few published accounts of approaches to case development and simulated patient (SP) training. We assess the feasibility of SPs playing complex surgical roles and evaluate a three-phased framework for case development and SP training. METHODS: We developed two patient roles for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) under local anesthesia. In all cases, the conscious patient interacted with the surgical team throughout the procedure. SPs were trained to simulate routine and crisis situations, using our framework. After consulting with each SP, surgeons "performed" a CEA upon a model attached to the SP. Evaluation of the framework used interviews, observations, and written evaluations with SPs, surgeons, and the project team. Descriptive statistics summarize surgeons' ratings of realism and qualitative data are analyzed thematically. RESULTS: In all, 46 simulations were conducted with 23 surgeons and three SPs. Real patient interview transcripts provided SPs with authentic information. The SP framework was easy to use, SP training was successful and surgeons' rated SP realism very highly. SPs valued guidance from the SOT control room using an audiolink. CONCLUSIONS: Actors can be trained to portray patients undergoing complex procedures. Our framework for case development and SP training was effective in creating realistic roles. Future studies could evaluate this framework for additional procedures.