The rupture of an anterior communicating artery aneurysm does not associate with an asymmetry in the A1 or A2 arteries: a retrospective study of radiological features.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although the formation and rupture risk of an anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysm has been the subject of many studies, no previous study has primarily searched for the relationship of the parent and daughter vessels and the impact of their size/diameter ratio on the potential rupture risk of an AcoA aneurysm. The objective of this study is to explore this link and to further analyse the surrounding vasculature of the anterior communicating artery aneurysm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 434 patients: 284 patients with an ACoA aneurysm (121 unruptured and 162 ruptured) and 150 control patients without an ΑCoA aneurysm. Radiological angiography investigations were used to assess the diameter ratios of the parent vessels in addition to ACoA aneurysm morphology parameters. RESULTS: When comparing the ruptured to the unruptured cases, we observed no significant difference in the parent or daughter vessel diameter ratios. Younger patient age (OR 0.96, p = 0.00) and a higher aneurysm size ratio (OR 1.10, p = 0.02) were of prognostic importance concerning the rupture risk of the aneurysm. The A1 diameter ratio and the A2 diameter were not statistically significant (OR 1.00, p = 0.99, and OR 3.38, p = 0.25 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we focused on asymmetry in the parent and daughter vessels as well as traditional ACoA aneurysm morphological characteristics. We were able to label younger patient age and a greater size ratio as independent prognostic factors for ACoA aneurysm rupture. We were unable to label parent and daughter vessel asymmetry as prognostic factors. To validate our findings, parent and daughter vessel asymmetry should be subjected to future prospective studies.

Asymmetry of P1 and vertebral arteries is not related to basilar tip aneurysm development or rupture.

OBJECTIVE: Lately, morphological parameters of the surrounding vasculature aside from aneurysm size, specific for the aneurysm location, e.g., posterior cerebral artery angle for basilar artery tip aneurysms, could be identified to correlate with the risk of rupture. We examined further image-based morphological parameters of the aneurysm surrounding vasculature that could correlate with the growth or the risk of rupture of basilar artery tip aneurysms. METHODS: Data from 83 patients with basilar tip aneurysms (27 not ruptured; 56 ruptured) and 100 control patients were assessed (50 without aneurysms and 50 with aneurysms of the anterior circle of Willis). Anatomical parameters of the aneurysms were assessed and analyzed, as well as of the surrounding vasculature, namely the asymmetry of P1 and the vertebral arteries. RESULTS: Patients with basilar tip aneurysm showed no significant increase in P1 or vertebral artery asymmetry compared with the control patients or patients with aneurysms of the anterior circulation, neither was there a significant difference in asymmetry between cases with ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Furthermore, we observed no significant correlations between P1 asymmetry and the aneurysm size or number of lobuli in the aneurysms. CONCLUSION: We observed no significant difference in aneurysm size, rupture, or lobulation associated with P1 or vertebral artery (surrounding vasculature) asymmetry. Therefore, the asymmetry of the surrounding vessels does not seem to be a promising morphological parameter for the evaluation of probability of rupture and growth in basilar tip aneurysms in future studies.