Case report: direct revascularization in acute mesenteric ischemia by an endovascular approach.

BACKGROUND: Acute mesenteric ischemia is a relatively rare but life-threatening clinical condition. Outcome depends on early diagnosis and prompt intervention. CASE PRESENTATION: A 85-year-old man and a 75-year-old woman developed acute mesenteric ischemia due to cardiac embolism. The first patient received an insufficient dose of anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation and the second patient dicontinued her anticoagulantia to avoid bleeding during a routine colonoscopy. Both patients presented with severe abdominal pain and computed tomography showed thrombus in de superior mesenteric artery. Successfulrevascularization with good clinical outcome was achieved by means of an endovascular first approach. CONCLUSION: This case report shows that an endovascular approach - in contrast to open surgery - not only enables to revascularize main trunk lesions but can also facilitate revascularization of side branches. Endovascular treatment used to be limited to a selected group of patients without signs of bowel necrosis, but there is a tendency to initiate endovascular revascularization in all patients because it is associated with a reduced mortality, a reduced laparotomy rate and reduction in the resected length of bowel.

Predictors of Failure of Closure in Percutaneous EVAR Using the Prostar XL Percutaneous Vascular Surgery Device.

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of failure in percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair (P-EVAR) using the Prostar XL Percutaneous Vascular Surgery Device (Abbot Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and the need for conversion to conventional femoral cutdown (O-EVAR). METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent P-EVAR with the Prostar XL device between January 2009 and April 2012 were included in this series. Patients with a circular calcified common femoral artery (CFA) oncomputed tomography angiography were operated using O-EVAR and were therefore excluded. To identify predictors of success of closure in P-EVAR, artery characteristics, sheath size used, and comorbidities were analyzed in a univariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: Percutaneous access was achieved in 154 femoral access sites with conversion to O-EVAR was needed in10 (6.5%). Significant predictors of conversion included sheath size (continuous, relative risk [RR] 1.50, p < .03)and the ratio between sheath size and CFA diameter >0.75 (RR 8.93, p < .01). Variables such as calcification quantity scores, CFA diameter, body mass index, and comorbidities were not significant. CONCLUSION: The data demonstrate that sheath size, in particular, combined with CFA diameter predicts failure of closure in P-EVAR using the Prostar XL device. This ratio can be utilized to help in decision making with regard to the EVAR approach. A ratio of >0.75 would favor a primary open groin approach.

Pain perception during and after VNUS ClosureFAST™ procedure.

The objective of the study was first to quantify the level of pain that patients experience during VNUS ClosureFAST™ and in the first week following treatment. Secondly, to investigate the use of pain medication. Thirdly, to identify after how many days patients return to daily activities and whether pain is a factor of influence. A prospective descriptive cohort study was carried out. In all, 104 consecutive VNUS ClosureFAST procedures for greater saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence between 18 May and 28 August 2009 in the HagaZiekenhuis were included. A visual analogue score (VAS) was recorded immediately after the procedure. These patients were asked to register pain scores during the week following the procedure, the amount of pain medication if used and the time elapsed between the procedures and resuming daily activities. The average VAS score during the VNUS Closure procedure was four. The first three days after the procedure the VAS score was 2. After four days, the average score was 1. The average return to daily activities was on day two after the procedure. In total, 24% of all patients used paracetamol after the procedure. In summary, VNUS ClosureFAST procedure for GSV incompetence is not a painless treatment. After an average of two days, patients return to their daily activities. Pain does not seem to be a major factor in the resumption. Seventy-six percent of patients do not use any pain medication.

[Spiral computed tomographic angiography as a substitute for intra-arterial angiography of aorta and its branches]. / Spiraaltomografische angiografie als vervanger van intra-arteriële angiografie van aorta en zijtakken.

Until recently, intra-arterial angiography was the diagnostic method of first choice when pathology of the aorta or its branches was suspected. A disadvantage of this technique is that only the lumen of spaces with blood flow can be visualised and that the soft tissue surroundings remain (partly) invisible. Spiral computer tomographic angiography (CTA) has some major advantages compared with conventional angiography. The technique is less invasive and faster. Also, the soft tissue is imaged by CTA. In addition, computer reconstructions allow viewing from all directions without the limitations of overprojection. Spiral CTA is a suitable technique for imaging the thoracic part of the aorta: in case of dissection if transoesophageal echography is not available, in case of an aneurysm to determine the diameter and in case of rupture as a highly sensitive but not very specific examination technique. For imaging of the abdominal part of the aorta, spiral CTA may be considered. In case of an aneurysm or a possible rupture of this part of the aorta it is then possible to visualize the operation area and to choose the optimal approach. For the exclusion of stenoses in mesenteric arteries or in renal arteries, spiral CTA offers the advantage of non-invasivity. The technique is less suitable for demonstration of these stenoses and does not allow immediate intervention.

Concerns for the durability of the proximal abdominal aortic aneurysm endograft fixation from a 2-year and 3-year longitudinal computed tomography angiography study.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a long-term perspective on the durability of the proximal abdominal aortic aneurysm endograft fixation from a single device series with perpendicular neck measurements in two groups of patients with complete 2- and 3-year follow-up. DESIGN: This was a prospective study of postoperative, radiologic images. SETTING: The study used a referral center, institutional practice, and ambulatory patients. SUBJECTS: From January 1994 until May 1998, 37 endografts were implanted for abdominal aortic aneurysm. In the first postoperative year, there were four unrelated deaths and six conversions, leaving 27 patients with complete 24-month data and 13 with complete 36-month data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Computed tomography angiograms were processed on a work station to measure the neck perpendicular to the central lumen line of the aorta. The surface area at the proximal endovascular anastomosis was recorded at each follow-up interval and related to the postoperative size at the same level. RESULTS: Significant dilatation of the surface area was found: 20% (16% to 27%) at 24 months (c2 = 30; P < .001, Friedman) and 23% (18% to 28%) at 36 months (c2 = 27; P < .001, Friedman). This increase in neck size was continuous and linear, with a yearly rate of approximately 10% surface area; translated into diameter, this approximates 1 mm/y. CONCLUSION: A continuous aortic enlargement of approximately 1 mm/y at the level of the proximal endovascular anastomosis was found. Because of the practice of oversizing the endograft relative to the infrarenal aortic neck, a loss of the endovascular seal may not become apparent until several years after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is performed.

Inter- and intraobserver variability of CT measurements obtained after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: Important decisions are made on the basis of CT angiographic measurements of aneurysm size obtained after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair; however, little is known about the variability of these measurements. We evaluated the variability of CT angiographic measurements of aneurysm size obtained after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty CT angiographic data sets were randomly chosen from 91 sets, including preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up CT images. All images were obtained according to a standardized acquisition protocol. On a workstation, three parameters were measured: maximum aneurysm diameter, maximum aneurysm cross-sectional area, and aneurysm volume. All data sets were measured twice by two investigators in a random order. The difference of each pair of measurements was plotted against the mean value. The mean difference and its standard deviation were calculated with a repeatability coefficient. RESULTS: The intraobserver repeatability coefficient for observer 1 was 3.8 mm for diameter, 201.7 mm(2) for cross-sectional area, and 5.6 mL for volume. For observer 2, these figures were 3.0 mm, 219.0 mm(2), and 8.1 mL, respectively. The interobserver repeatability coefficients were 3.9 mm, 236.2 mm(2), and 10.3 mL. CONCLUSION: Determination of the repeatability coefficient of aneurysm size measurements obtained after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair provides a good description of precision.

Maximal aneurysm diameter follow-up is inadequate after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: follow-up after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EAR) generally consists of serial diameter measurements. A size change after EAR, however, is the consequence of alterations of the excluded aneurysm sac volume. OBJECTIVE: to assess the agreement between diameter measurements and volume measurements after endovascular aneurysm repair. PATIENTS AND METHODS: from 53 consecutive patients scheduled for EAR, follow-up of at least 6 months was available in 35 patients. CTA was performed on all patients at discharge, at 6 months and yearly thereafter. The resulting 113 datasets were processed on a workstation in a blinded and random order. Maximal aneurysm diameter (DMAX) was measured along the central lumen line. Total aneurysm volume was measured by manual segmentation. All measurements of an individual patient were compared with each other, resulting in 149 comparisons. The significance of individual size changes was classified based on the 95% confidence limits of the intra-observer variability, using difference-of-means analysis. DMAX changes were compared to volume changes. RESULTS: in 37% of the comparisons, discordance was found between DMAX and volume measurements. A decrease in aneurysm size was missed using DMAX in 14% of cases and an increase in 19% of cases. CONCLUSION: aneurysm size changes after EAR are not noticed using maximal diameter measurements in over one-third of cases.

Dilatation of the proximal neck of infrarenal aortic aneurysms after endovascular AAA repair.

OBJECTIVES: to assess size changes of the proximal aortic neck after endograft placement. METHODS: since 1994, 54 consecutive patients have undergone abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair with the Endovascular Technologies (EVT) endograft. The study group comprised the 33 patients who had completed at least six months of the prospective follow-up protocol. The pre-, postoperative and follow-up helical computed tomography (CT) angiograms (CTAs) were processed on a workstation. The proximal neck dimensions were measured perpendicular to the central lumen line of the aortic neck. The cross-sectional area was measured at the proximal attachment system and at 1 cm proximal to the renal arteries. RESULTS: while the dimensions of suprarenal aorta did not change, a significant dilatation of the proximal neck was found. The median increase was 10.3% at 6 months and 15.5% at 12 months. No correlation could be found between the amount of dilatation and pre- or postoperative neck-size, graft diameter and amount of graft-oversizing. CONCLUSION: the infrarenal aortic neck demonstrates continued dilatation during follow-up after endograft placement.

Mid-term fixation stability of the EndoVascular Technologies endograft. EVT Investigators.

AIM OF THE STUDY: to determine the positional stability of the EndoVascular Technologies (EVT) endograft after endovascular aneurysm repair during morphologic changes of the abdominal aorta during follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: all patients treated worldwide with an EVT endograft with an adequate postoperative and at least 12 months postoperative CT scan were included (n=125). Endograft migration was investigated by recording the position of the endograft attachment systems relative to the renal arteries and the aortic or iliac bifurcations. The vertical body axis served as a scale to quantify migration. Aortic cross-sectional areas were measured in the suprarenal aorta and in the proximal and distal aneurysm necks. Length changes of the infrarenal aorta during follow-up were measured, comparing the distance between the left renal artery and the aortic bifurcation. RESULTS: the median follow-up was 24 months (range 12-48 months). Graft migration was identified in 4 out of 125 patients (3%). Significant infrarenal aortic dilation was observed at the proximal and distal aneurysm neck during follow-up. However, aortic neck dilation was not associated with endograft migration. The length of the infrarenal aorta did not change significantly after endovascular repair. CONCLUSION: fixation by stents containing hooks of the EVT design appear to be effective in preventing migration of endografts with an unsupported trunk for up to four years. A stable position was maintained in spite of changes in cross-sectional areas of the aneurysm neck.

Length measurements of the aorta after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: successful endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) generally leads to a decrease in aneurysm size. Theoretically, this may lead to foreshortening of the excluded segment. If so, vertically rigid endografts may dislocate over time and cover renal or hypogastric arteries. AIM: to assess length changes of the infrarenal aorta after endovascular AAA exclusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: forty-four consecutive patients were scheduled for the EndoVascular Technologies endograft, a vertically non-rigid prosthesis which would potentially accommodate longitudinal changes. Twenty-four patients had completed at least 6 months of follow-up. In 18/24 patients a decrease in size was established by aneurysm volume measurements at 6 months' follow-up. Helical computer tomography (CT) angiograms were processed on a workstation. Aortic lengths were measured along the central lumen line from the lower renal artery orifice to the native aortic bifurcation. The computer tomography angiogram (CTA) reconstruction thickness of 2 mm yields at least a 4-mm error for each length measurement. RESULTS: in the shrinking aneurysm group, the median length change was 0 mm (range -9 mm to +4 mm) at 6 months' follow-up (n =18) and also 0 mm (range -7 mm to +4 mm) at 12 months' follow-up ( n =10). In 16/18 patients, length changes remained within the measurement error range of 4 mm. CONCLUSION: in this group of shrinking aneurysms after endovascular AAA repair, foreshortening of the excluded aortic segment appears not to be a clinically significant problem.