Structure-Based Design of Inhibitors Selective for Human Proteasome ß2c or ß2i Subunits.

Subunit-selective proteasome inhibitors are valuable tools to assess the biological and medicinal relevance of individual proteasome active sites. Whereas the inhibitors for the ß1c, ß1i, ß5c, and ß5i subunits exploit the differences in the substrate-binding channels identified by X-ray crystallography, compounds selectively targeting ß2c or ß2i could not yet be rationally designed because of the high structural similarity of these two subunits. Here, we report the development, chemical synthesis, and biological screening of a compound library that led to the identification of the ß2c- and ß2i-selective compounds LU-002c (4; IC50 ß2c: 8 nM, IC50 ß2i/ß2c: 40-fold) and LU-002i (5; IC50 ß2i: 220 nM, IC50 ß2c/ß2i: 45-fold), respectively. Co-crystal structures with ß2 humanized yeast proteasomes visualize protein-ligand interactions crucial for subunit specificity. Altogether, organic syntheses, activity-based protein profiling, yeast mutagenesis, and structural biology allowed us to decipher significant differences of ß2 substrate-binding channels and to complete the set of subunit-selective proteasome inhibitors.

Inhibition of the Proteasome ß2 Site Sensitizes Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells to ß5 Inhibitors and Suppresses Nrf1 Activation.

The proteasome inhibitors carfilzomib (Cfz) and bortezomib (Btz) are used successfully to treat multiple myeloma, but have not shown clinical efficacy in solid tumors. Here we show that clinically achievable inhibition of the ß5 site of the proteasome by Cfz and Btz does not result in loss of viability of triple-negative breast cancer cell lines. We use site-specific inhibitors and CRISPR-mediated genetic inactivation of ß1 and ß2 to demonstrate that inhibiting a second site of the proteasome, particularly the ß2 site, sensitizes cell lines to Btz and Cfz in vitro and in vivo. Inhibiting both ß5 and ß2 suppresses production of the soluble, active form of the transcription factor Nrf1 and prevents the recovery of proteasome activity through induction of new proteasomes. These findings provide a strong rationale for the development of dual ß5 and ß2 inhibitors for the treatment of solid tumors.

The novel ß2-selective proteasome inhibitor LU-102 synergizes with bortezomib and carfilzomib to overcome proteasome inhibitor resistance of myeloma cells.

Proteasome inhibitor resistance is a challenge for myeloma therapy. Bortezomib targets the ß5 and ß1 activity, but not the ß2 activity of the proteasome. Bortezomib-resistant myeloma cells down-regulate the activation status of the unfolded protein response, and up-regulate ß2 proteasome activity. To improve proteasome inhibition in bortezomib-resistant myeloma and to achieve more efficient UPR activation, we have developed LU-102, a selective inhibitor of the ß2 proteasome activity. LU-102 inhibited the ß2 activity in intact myeloma cells at low micromolar concentrations without relevant co-inhibition of ß1 and ß5 proteasome subunits. In proteasome inhibitor-resistant myeloma cells, significantly more potent proteasome inhibition was achieved by bortezomib or carfilzomib in combination with LU-102, compared to bortezomib/carfilzomib alone, resulting in highly synergistic cytotoxic activity of the drug combination via endoplasmatic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis. Combining bortezomib/carfilzomib with LU-102 significantly prolonged proteasome inhibition and increased activation of the unfolded protein response and IRE1-a activity. IRE1-α has recently been shown to control myeloma cell differentiation and bortezomib sensitivity (Leung-Hagesteijn, Cancer Cell 24:3, 289-304). Thus, ß2-selective proteasome inhibition by LU-102 in combination with bortezomib or carfilzomib results in synergistic proteasome inhibition, activation of the unfolded protein response, and cytotoxicity, and overcomes bortezomib/carfilzomib resistance in myeloma cells in vitro.

Phlorins bearing different substituents at the sp3-hybridized meso-position.

Phlorins bearing different substituents at the sp(3)-hybridized meso-position were investigated. The extent to which different substituents at this unique position can influence phlorin spectroscopic properties, structure, and stability is of interest given that such substituents are not in direct conjugation with the phlorin macrocycle. While the effect of various substituents at the sp(2)-hybridized positions has been the subject of prior investigations, the impact of different substituents at the saturated carbon atom has not been systematically examined. In this study, phlorins with different combinations of geminal methyl and phenyl substituents were prepared in yields of 24-49% via dipyrromethane + dipyrromethanedicarbinol routes, and their NMR spectra, UV-vis spectra, X-ray crystal structures, and stability toward light and air were compared. The nature of the substituents at the sp(3)-hybridized position was found to impact spectroscopic properties, structure, and stability to varying degrees. Thus, the choice of substituents at the sp(3)-hybridized meso-position provides a further option for altering phlorin properties.

Cell-line-specific high background in the Proteasome-Glo assay of proteasome trypsin-like activity.

Proteasome-Glo is a homogeneous cell-based assay of proteasomal chymotrypsin-like, trypsin-like, and caspase-like activities using luminogenic substrates, commercially available from Promega. Here we report that the background activity from cleavage of the substrate of the trypsin-like sites by nonproteasomal proteases in multiple breast and lung cancer cell lines exceeds the activity of the proteasome. We also observed substantial background chymotrypsin-like activity in some cell lines. Thus, Proteasome-Glo assay must be used with caution, and it is necessary to include a specific proteasome inhibitor to determine the background for each proteasome activity.