Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 35(10): 1023-32, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11099054

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Trials evaluating long-term management of duodenal ulcer disease have mainly been focused on recurrence of ulcers, disregarding effects on dyspeptic and reflux symptoms. Profound acid inhibition with a proton pump inhibitor is the gold standard therapy in acid-related diseases. We aimed to compare the symptomatic effects of eradication therapy with those of long-term omeprazole treatment in a design with periods both with and without acid inhibition. METHODS: Patients with active duodenal ulcer were randomized either to omeprazole, 20 mg twice daily until healing, followed by omeprazole, 20 mg/ day for 1 year, or to eradication therapy (metronidazole, amoxicillin, and omeprazole for 2 weeks) followed by placebo for 1 year. All patients were followed up passively for an additional year. Clinical controls were performed every 2 months the 1st year (maintenance phase) and every 6 months during the passive follow-up phase. The study was multicentric and double-blind. The primary end-point was discontinuation of treatment, irrespective of reason. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-six patients were randomized (139 in the eradication treatment group). In the maintenance phase there were no differences in the reporting of dyspeptic symptoms or in premature withdrawal. In the passive follow-up phase only five patients in the eradication therapy group discontinued owing to relapse of dyspeptic symptoms or ulcer, compared with 51 patients initially randomized to long-term omeprazole. There were no differences in reflux symptoms or in the development of reflux oesophagitis. CONCLUSIONS: Eradication therapy and long-term omeprazole are equally effective in controlling dyspeptic symptoms and reflux in duodenal ulcer patients with healed ulcers. One-quarter of the duodenal ulcer patients who start eradication therapy continue to be symptomatic or fail therapy for other reasons over a 2-year period. Eradication therapy does not increase the risk of reflux in ulcer patients.


Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use , Duodenal Ulcer/drug therapy , Gastric Acid/metabolism , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Helicobacter pylori , Omeprazole/therapeutic use , Amoxicillin/therapeutic use , Anti-Ulcer Agents/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Duodenal Ulcer/microbiology , Duodenal Ulcer/physiopathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Metronidazole/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Omeprazole/administration & dosage , Penicillins/therapeutic use , Quality of Life
2.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 33(1): 15-20, 1998 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9489902

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux are common, and currently available methods for diagnosing reflux disease are expensive and uncomfortable for the patient. The diagnostic value of a treatment test with omeprazole is unclear. METHODS: Patients with dyspepsia including heartburn admitted for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were studied in a prospective, randomized, double-blind Scandinavian multicentre study. Before entry 188 patients were enrolled, and 160 were randomized to 1-week treatment with 20 mg omeprazole twice daily or placebo. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was defined as reflux oesophagitis Savary-Miller grades II-III at endoscopy or pH < 4 exceeding 4% of the total time at 24-h oesophageal pH-monitoring and was found in 135 patients. The treatment test was considered positive when the patient's symptoms improved during the treatment week compared with the pretreatment day. RESULTS: The sensitivity in diagnosing reflux disease was 71-81% with omeprazole as a diagnostic test, compared with 36-47% for placebo during treatment days 3-7. The specificity was similar for the two treatment arms during the first days of the study. During the end of the week a larger proportion of the patients with normal endoscopy and pH test responded to omeprazole treatment, giving omeprazole lower specificity than placebo. The investigators' overall evaluation of whether the patient was a responder to the test had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 55% in the omeprazole-treated patients. The corresponding figures in the placebo group were 17% and 92%, respectively. CONCLUSION: One week of omeprazole treatment is a simple diagnostic test with a fairly high sensitivity. The specificity is poor owing to the placebo effect and to the lack of a gold standard in diagnosing reflux disease.


Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Omeprazole/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Dyspepsia/diagnosis , Dyspepsia/drug therapy , Esophagoscopy , Female , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Male , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...